510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Epicare-Duo Laser System

K091625510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 3, 2009153-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Light Age, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Nov 3, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K032991 (Light Age, Inc., 2004) and 2 other predicates after a 153-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1992. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 3, 2009
Review
153 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K910422 (1992). 68 ancestors in all, the oldest K892514 (1990). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK023193 Candela Gentle Yag Laser SystemCandela Corp. · 2002
  4. 2 generations backK033172 Candela Gentleyag Family of Laser SystemsCandela Corp. · 2003
  5. 1 generation backK063074 Candela 3630 Laser SystemCandela Corp. · 2006
  6. This deviceK091625 Epicare-Duo Laser SystemLight Age, Inc. · 2009
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK113115 Epicare YagLight Age, Inc. · 2012
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 8 generations backK961279 Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996
  3. 7 generations backK962446 Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1997
  4. 6 generations backK974536 Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 1998
  5. 5 generations backK991935 Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 2000
  6. 4 generations backK014040 Family of Altus Medical Modified Coolglide Aesthetic Lasers, Models…Altus Medical, Inc. · 2002
  7. 3 generations backK023193 Candela Gentle Yag Laser SystemCandela Corp. · 2002
  8. 2 generations backK033172 Candela Gentleyag Family of Laser SystemsCandela Corp. · 2003
  9. 1 generation backK063074 Candela 3630 Laser SystemCandela Corp. · 2006
  10. This deviceK091625 Epicare-Duo Laser SystemLight Age, Inc. · 2009

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K113115Epicare YagLight Age, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K910422Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc.1992—
−8K961279Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1996—
−7K962446Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1997—
−6K974536Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.1998—
−5K991935Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.2000—
−4K014040Family of Altus Medical Modified Coolglide Aesthetic Lasers, Models Coolglide…Altus Medical, Inc.2002—
−3K023193Candela Gentle Yag Laser SystemCandela Corp.2002—
−2K033172Candela Gentleyag Family of Laser SystemsCandela Corp.2003—
−1K063074Candela 3630 Laser SystemCandela Corp.2006—
0 (this device)K091625Epicare-Duo Laser SystemLight Age, Inc.2009—
+1K113115Epicare YagLight Age, Inc.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199010
199310
199420
199510
199630
199780
199860
199950
200090
200180
200260
200370
200420

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091625, 1992–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K032991Light Age Epicare Alexandrite Laser, Models 501-1H, 501-SP, 501-LP and 501-LPX
Summary page 1
…ection 878.4810 Device Class: 1I Product Code: GEX Predicate Devices: *Light Age, Inc. EpiCareim Alexandrite Laser System [K032991), *Cynosure Apogee Elite [K034030], *Candela Corp Gentlet-ase Family of Lasers [K063074] lDcvice Descript(ion: The Light Age…
Light Age, Inc.2004—
*K034030Apogee Elite
Summary page 1
…Class: 1I Product Code: GEX Predicate Devices: *Light Age, Inc. EpiCareim Alexandrite Laser System [K032991), *Cynosure Apogee Elite [K034030], *Candela Corp Gentlet-ase Family of Lasers [K063074] lDcvice Descript(ion: The Light Age EpiCare-DUOTM1 Laser is a Class IV…
Cynosure, Inc.2004—
*K063074Candela 3630 Laser System
Summary page 1
…EX Predicate Devices: *Light Age, Inc. EpiCareim Alexandrite Laser System [K032991), *Cynosure Apogee Elite [K034030], *Candela Corp Gentlet-ase Family of Lasers [K063074] lDcvice Descript(ion: The Light Age EpiCare-DUOTM1 Laser is a Class IV Laser Surgical Instrument for use in General medical/cos…
Candela Corp.2006—

Also cleared against K032991: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K113115Epicare YagLight Age, Inc.20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 4 of the 68 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K113115 (Light Age, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K032991.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Light Age, Inc. EpiCare-DUOTM Laser System is intended for use in general and plastic surgery, dermatology, and podiatry for the treatment of vascular lesions, benign pigmented lesions, for removal of dark tattoo inks and reduction of hypertrophic and keloid scars and for stable long-term, or permanent hair reduction. Permanent hair reduction is defined as long-term stable reduction in the number of hair regrowth after a treatment regime on all skin…

Read the full statement (454 words)

The Light Age, Inc. EpiCare-DUOTM Laser System is intended for use in general and

plastic surgery, dermatology, and podiatry for the treatment of vascular lesions, benign

pigmented lesions, for removal of dark tattoo inks and reduction of hypertrophic and

keloid scars and for stable long-term, or permanent hair reduction. Permanent hair

reduction is defined as long-term stable reduction in the number of hair regrowth after a

treatment regime on all skin types (Fitzpatrick I-VI including tanned skin.) No new

indications were sought in this 510(K) and no clinical data is presented.

Light Age, Inc. is providing more specialized indications which are a subset of the previously cleared indications. From both a design and clinical perspective, the predicate and candidate laser devices, are of the same technology and have the same intended use. Based upon an analysis of the overall performance characteristics for the devices, Light Age, Inc. believes that no significant differences exist.

755nm- Specifically the 755 nm mode is indicated

· Hair removal, and stable long-term or permanent hair reduction through selective

targeting of melanin in hair follicles on all skin types (Fitzpatrick I-VI) including

tanned skin. Permanent hair reduction is defined as long-term stable reduction in

the number of hair regrowth after a treatment regime. The number of hairs re-

growing must be stable over a time greater than the duration of the complete

growth cycle of hair follicles, which varies from 4-12 months according to body

location. Permanent hair reduction does not necessarily imply the elimination of

all hairs in the treated area.

* Treatment of vascular lesions

* Treatment of benign pigmented lesions.

* Treatment of wrinkles.

1064nm -

* Removal of unwanted hair, for stable long term or permanent hair reduction on all

skin types Fitzpatrick W-VI including tanned skin.

• Photocoagulation and hemostasis of pigmented and vascular lesions such as but

not limited to port wine stains, hemoangioma, warts, telangiectasia, rosacea,

venus lake, leg veins, and spider veins and poikiloderma of civatte. Coagulation

and hemostasis of soft tissue.

* Benign cutaneous lesions such as warts, scars striac and psoriasis.

* Benign pigmented lesions such as, but not limited to, lentigos (age spots), solar

lentigos (sun spots), caf6 au lait macules, seborrheio keratoses, nevi, chloasma,

verrucae, skin tags, keratoses, tattoos (significant reduction in the intensity of

black and/or blue-black tattoos) and plaques.

* Pigmented lesion size reduction in patients with lesions who would potentially

benefit from aggressive treatment, and for patients with lesions that have not

responded to other laser treatments.

* Reduction of red pigmentation in hypertrophic and keloid scars where vascularity

is an integral part of the scar.

* Treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB).

* Treatment of wrinkles including but not limited periocular wrinkles and perioral

wrinkles.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091625: Epicare-Duo Laser System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091625

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026