510(k) · Cleared
ClearedDC Provi Cem Esthetic, Esthetic Multi F, Implant
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
S & C Polymer GmbH · EMA Cement, Dental
Cleared on Sep 25, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K982590 (Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., 1998) after a 106-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Sep 25, 2009
- Review
- 106 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EMA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K982590 (1998). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backK982590 Tempbond Clear-2Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
- This deviceK091735 DC Provi Cem Esthetic, Esthetic Multi F, ImplantS & C Polymer GmbH · 2009
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK110759 TempocemDmg USA, Inc. · 2011
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK142446 Fixtemp CementExacta Dental Direct, Inc. · 2015
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K982590 | Tempbond Clear-2 | Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. | 1998 | 2 |
| 0 (this device) | K091735 | DC Provi Cem Esthetic, Esthetic Multi F, Implant | S & C Polymer GmbH | 2009 | — |
| +1 | K110759 | Tempocem | Dmg USA, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| +2 | K142446 | Fixtemp Cement | Exacta Dental Direct, Inc. | 2015 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device
- #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K982590 | Tempbond Clear-2Summary page 1…ic Multi F and DC Provi Cem Implant) Classification Name: Cement Dental, per 21 CFR § 872.3275 Devices for which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Tempbond Clear, K982590 Device descriptionand Intended Use of the device: Provi Cern Esthetic consist of three different cements: DC Provi Cem Esthet… | 1998 |
What descends from it? (2)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K110759 | Tempocem | 2011 | 1 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Its one ancestor has a recall.
- Of its descendants, K110759 (Dmg USA, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
How does its category compare?
All EMA devicesEMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · EMA
10in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · EMA
106in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · EMA
1in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · EMA
9in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 33 |
| 2008 | 13 | 71 | 2 | 50 |
| 2009 | 10 | 86 | 1 | 90 |
| 2010 | 14 | 86 | 1 | 106 |
| 2011 | 8 | 79 | 5 | 224 |
| 2012 | 10 | 128 | 0 | 249 |
| 2013 | 12 | 178 | 0 | 385 |
| 2014 | 4 | 174 | 0 | 207 |
| 2015 | 9 | 134 | 0 | 85 |
| 2016 | 10 | 182 | 0 | 16 |
| 2017 | 3 | 141 | 0 | 13 |
| 2018 | 3 | 237 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7 | 127 | 0 | 12 |
| 2020 | 8 | 164 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 4 | 184 | 0 | 8 |
| 2022 | 7 | 245 | 0 | 3 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 1 | 6 |
| 2024 | 3 | 59 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 10 | 106 | 0 | 9 |
| 2026 | 7 | 150 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
DC Provi Cem Esthetic and DC Provi Cem Esthetic Multi F:
Intended for cementing temporary restorations such as crowns, bridges inlays or onlays; as well as for trial cementing of permanent restorations-
DC Provi Cem Implant:
Intended for cementing of semi-permanent implants;
all cements can also be used as temporary filling materials
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K091735 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K091735: DC Provi Cem Esthetic, Esthetic Multi F, Implant.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091735
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026