510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Clayton Intra-Aural Device (Cid)

K091880510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 24, 2010245-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ascentia Health Incorporated · MQC Mouthguard, Prescription

Cleared on Feb 24, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K981546 (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc., 1998) after a 245-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998.

Decided
Feb 24, 2010
Review
245 days
Class
Class U
Product code
MQC
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K981546 (1998). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K981546 · Nti Clenching Suppression System · Heraeus Kulzer, Inc. · 19981995200020052010
  1. Root · 1 generation backK981546 Nti Clenching Suppression SystemHeraeus Kulzer, Inc. · 1998
  2. This deviceK091880 Clayton Intra-Aural Device (Cid)Ascentia Health Incorporated · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K981546Nti Clenching Suppression SystemHeraeus Kulzer, Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K091880Clayton Intra-Aural Device (Cid)Ascentia Health Incorporated2010—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091880, 1998–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MQC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MQC device

  1. #1 K203000 KeyPrint KeySplint Hardscore 15.4 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K981546Nti Clenching Suppression System
Summary page 1
…zation splints or mouthguards) “individually fabricated for each patient by dentists in their offices since at least the 1940s;" and 2. NTI-Clenching Suppression System (K981546), Heraeus Kulzer, Incorporated. 5. Device Description: : The CID is comprised of a pair of small, hollow, ear inserts made of me…
Heraeus Kulzer, Inc.1998—
*—Custom-fit flat plane occlusal appliances (also referred to as stabilization splints or…
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K981546: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K981546.

How does its category compare?

All MQC devices

MQC Mouthguard, Prescription: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MQC

4in 2025

2007: 42009: 22010: 12011: 42012: 22013: 12014: 12015: 32017: 22019: 52020: 42021: 72022: 52023: 62024: 82025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 8 (2024) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MQC

185in 2025

2007: 79 days median2011: 194 days median2015: 234 days median2019: 286 days median2020: 204 days median2021: 158 days median2022: 120 days median2023: 230 days median2024: 249 days median2025: 185 days median
2007high 286 (2019) · low 79 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MQC

1in 2023

2023: 1
2007high 1 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MQC

7in 2025

2007: 92008: 62009: 32010: 52011: 22013: 62014: 22015: 52016: 92017: 72018: 712019: 622020: 462021: 1112022: 1372023: 622024: 82025: 7
2007high 137 (2022) · low 0 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MQC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200747909
20080—06
20092—03
20101—05
2011419402
20122—00
20131—06
20141—02
2015323405
20160—09
20172—07
20180—071
20195286062
20204204046
202171580111
202251200137
20236230162
2024824908
2025418507
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The CID is indicated as an aid in reducing temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091880: Clayton Intra-Aural Device (Cid).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091880

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026