510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Metasul Taper Liners, Metasul Femoral Heads

K091973510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 17, 2009139-day reviewClass III21 CFR 888.3330Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer GmbH · KWA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained (Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component)

Cleared on Nov 17, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K974728 (Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., 1999) and 2 other predicates after a 139-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2001. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Nov 17, 2009
Review
139 days
Class
Class III
Product code
KWA
Recalls
4
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K004043 (2001). 16 ancestors in all, the oldest K883460 (1988). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor2000: 6 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1988: 1 other ancestorK004043 · Metal Transcend Articulation System · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2001K021349 · Metal Transcend Articulation System (Larger Sizes) · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2002K040627 · Depuy Asr Modular Acetabular Cup System · DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2005 · recalledK062426 · Depuy Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Cup Liners · DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2006198519901995200020052010
  1. Root · 4 generations backK004043 Metal Transcend Articulation SystemWrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2001
  2. 3 generations backK021349 Metal Transcend Articulation System (Larger Sizes)Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2002
  3. 2 generations backK040627 Depuy Asr Modular Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK062426 Depuy Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Cup LinersDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2006
  5. This deviceK091973 Metasul Taper Liners, Metasul Femoral HeadsZimmer GmbH · 2009
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K004043Metal Transcend Articulation SystemWrightmedicaltechnologyinc2001—
−3K021349Metal Transcend Articulation System (Larger Sizes)Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc2002—
−2K040627Depuy Asr Modular Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.200555
−1K062426Depuy Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Cup LinersDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K091973Metasul Taper Liners, Metasul Femoral HeadsZimmer GmbH2009—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198810
199510
199710
199810
199910
200060
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091973, 2001–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974728Inter-OP Metasul Acetabular System
Summary page 1
…cemented acetabular shell. Classification Reference: 21 CFR § 888.3330 Predicate Device: Inter-Op'TM Metasul Acetabular System (K974728), EpsilonlM Metasul Acetabular 32mm Insert/Fe…
Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.19991
*K033634Epsilon Metasul 32MM Acetabular Inserts, Standard and Hooded
Summary page 1
…l Acetabular System (K974728), EpsilonlM Metasul Acetabular 32mm Insert/Femoral Head (K033634), both manufactured by Zimmer, and Depuy Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal…
Centerpulse Orthopedics, Inc.20042
*K062426Depuy Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Cup Liners
Summary page 1
…both manufactured by Zimmer, and Depuy Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Cup Liners (K062426), manufactured by Depuy Orthopedics Device Description: The Meta…
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2006—

Also cleared against K974728: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 10, 2019Class IIZ-0334-2020Packaging change controlNon-highly polished implants may adhere to the LDPE bag (previous packaging configuration).
Oct 10, 2019Class IIZ-0335-2020Packaging change controlNon-highly polished implants may adhere to the LDPE bag (previous packaging configuration).
Jan 11, 2016Class IIZ-0850-2016Process controlLDPE bag containing the implant adheres to the highly polished implant surface.
Aug 30, 2013Class IIZ-0071-2014Package design/selectionThe low density polyethylene (LDPE) bag used to package implants adheres to the highly polished surface of the devices.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.9 years on median.
  • 3 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K974728.

How does its category compare?

All KWA devices

KWA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained (Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KWA

4in 2012

2007: 82008: 92009: 72010: 62011: 112012: 4
2007high 11 (2011) · low 0 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWA

76in 2012

2007: 74 days median2008: 57 days median2009: 139 days median2010: 167 days median2011: 101 days median2012: 76 days median
2007high 167 (2010) · low 57 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWA

19in 2023

2008: 132010: 842011: 282012: 212013: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 22020: 12023: 19
2007high 84 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWA

1,216in 2025

2007: 2132008: 7622009: 8202010: 3,3482011: 17,7372012: 24,6012013: 20,0202014: 16,4942015: 12,3392016: 7,8722017: 6,8472018: 6,3882019: 7,6282020: 4,5382021: 2,0642022: 1,6172023: 1,4742024: 1,1682025: 1,216
2007high 24,601 (2012) · low 213 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078740213
200895713762
200971390820
20106167843,348
2011111012817,737
20124762124,601
20130—120,020
20140—016,494
20150—012,339
20160—17,872
20170—16,847
20180—16,388
20190—27,628
20200—14,538
20210—02,064
20220—01,617
20230—191,474
20240—01,168
20250—01,216
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) including avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis and congenital hip dysplasia and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g. rheumatoid arthritis if bone quality is adequate. Failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists. Revision of previously failed hip arthroplasty. Total hip replacements may be considered for younger patients if any unequivocal indication…

Read the full statement (123 words)

Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) including avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis and congenital hip dysplasia and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g. rheumatoid arthritis if bone quality is adequate.

Failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists.

Revision of previously failed hip arthroplasty.

Total hip replacements may be considered for younger patients if any unequivocal indication outweighs the risks associated with the age of the patient and modified demands regarding activity and hip joint loading are assured. This includes severely handicapped patients with multiple joint involvement, for whom an immediate need of hip mobility leads to an expectation of significant improvement in the quality of their lives.

The system is intended for use either with or without bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091973: Metasul Taper Liners, Metasul Femoral Heads.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091973

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026