510(k) · Cleared
ClearedIntegrated Laboratory Automation Solution
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Integrated Laboratory Automation Solutions, Inc. · CGA Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
Cleared on Mar 10, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K922072 (Eastman Kodak Company, 1992) and 1 other predicate after a 252-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992.
- Decided
- Mar 10, 2010
- Review
- 252 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- CGA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K922072 (1992). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK922072 Kodak Ektachem 250 AnalyerEastman Kodak Company · 1992 · Recalled
- This deviceK091975 Integrated Laboratory Automation SolutionIntegrated Laboratory Automation Solutions, Inc. · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K922072 | Kodak Ektachem 250 Analyer | Eastman Kodak Company | 1992 | 15 |
| 0 (this device) | K091975 | Integrated Laboratory Automation Solution | Integrated Laboratory Automation Solutions, Inc. | 2010 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in CGA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new CGA device
- #1 K252488 ABL90 FLEX PLUS Systemscore 12.8 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K922072 | Kodak Ektachem 250 AnalyerSummary page 1…Predicate Device Information: Third Party analyzer examples: Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Vitros 950 AT Analyzer and Vitros 250 AT Automated Analyzer (k922072) Similar Software: Lablnterlink AWCC Software (kO1 0500) 5. Device Description: The automation system (ILAS)… | 1992 |
| * | K010500 | Automated Workcell Control Software | 2001 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
- 1 other device also cites its predicate K922072.
How does its category compare?
All CGA devicesCGA Glucose Oxidase, Glucose: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · CGA
2in 2024
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · CGA
249in 2023
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · CGA
3in 2023
Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · CGA
59in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code CGA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 122 | 2 | 29 |
| 2008 | 6 | 56 | 2 | 37 |
| 2009 | 10 | 155 | 4 | 75 |
| 2010 | 8 | 122 | 6 | 172 |
| 2011 | 9 | 217 | 3 | 423 |
| 2012 | 10 | 123 | 0 | 233 |
| 2013 | 3 | 441 | 3 | 172 |
| 2014 | 5 | 265 | 2 | 122 |
| 2015 | 4 | 150 | 6 (2) | 155 |
| 2016 | 4 | 157 | 2 | 36 |
| 2017 | 2 | — | 0 | 92 |
| 2018 | 2 | — | 0 | 69 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 1 | 116 |
| 2020 | 2 | — | 0 | 68 |
| 2021 | 1 | — | 0 | 48 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 272 |
| 2023 | 4 | 249 | 3 | 1,141 |
| 2024 | 2 | — | 0 | 266 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 59 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Integrated Laboratory Automation Solution (ILAS) is designed to transport clinical patient samples to clinical laboratory analyzers that perform the actual clinical tests. The ILAS system receives downloads from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) with the patient ID and test orders to be performed by the laboratory analyzer. The patient specimens are loaded onto the ILAS and bar codes are read. The bar codes are read at each analyzer station to…
Read the full statement (186 words)
The Integrated Laboratory Automation Solution (ILAS) is designed to transport clinical patient samples to clinical laboratory analyzers that perform the actual clinical tests. The ILAS system receives downloads from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) with the patient ID and test orders to be performed by the laboratory analyzer. The patient specimens are loaded onto the ILAS and bar codes are read. The bar codes are read at each analyzer station to determine if tests are to be run and if so the specimen is switched to a side track supplying the analyzer with the specimen.
The ILAS is an accessory to the Vitros 250 automated chemistry analyzer and other similar chemistry automated clinical analyzers. Automated clinical analyzers utilize various methods and technologies for the determination of numerous analytes, such as Glucose and other measurands that may be adaptable to each integrated analyzer.
Glucose on the ILAS system is for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic measurement of Glucose in plasma. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K091975 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K091975: Integrated Laboratory Automation Solution.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091975
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026