510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Norm Spinal System

K092011510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 28, 2009114-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Norm Tibbi Urunler Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi VE Ticar · MNH Orthosis, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation

Cleared on Oct 28, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K063708 (Taeyeon Medical Co., Ltd., 2007) and 1 other predicate after a 114-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2000.

Decided
Oct 28, 2009
Review
114 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MNH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K000319 (2000). 8 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK000319 Ebi Xfix DFS SystemEbi, L.P. · 2000
  2. 3 generations backK020279 Forex Corporation, Optima, Spinal SystemForex Corp. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. 2 generations backK031585 U&I, Optima, Spinal SystemU&I Corp., America · 2003 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK063708 4S Spinal SystemTaeyeon Medical Co., Ltd. · 2007
  5. This deviceK092011 Norm Spinal SystemNorm Tibbi Urunler Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi VE Ticar · 2009
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K000319Ebi Xfix DFS SystemEbi, L.P.2000—
−3K020279Forex Corporation, Optima, Spinal SystemForex Corp.20024
−2K031585U&I, Optima, Spinal SystemU&I Corp., America20035
−1K0637084S Spinal SystemTaeyeon Medical Co., Ltd.2007—
0 (this device)K092011Norm Spinal SystemNorm Tibbi Urunler Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi VE Ticar2009—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200040
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K092011, 2000–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MNH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K0637084S Spinal System
Summary page 1
…STANTIAL EQUIVALENCE: Norm Spinal System is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed in function, intended use, material and design to 4S Spinal System (K063708) and Optima Spinal System (K031585). 2.4 DEVICE DESCRIPTION: Norm Spinal System is a top-loading multiple compo…
Taeyeon Medical Co., Ltd.2007—
*K031585U&I, Optima, Spinal System
Summary page 1
…l System is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed in function, intended use, material and design to 4S Spinal System (K063708) and Optima Spinal System (K031585). 2.4 DEVICE DESCRIPTION: Norm Spinal System is a top-loading multiple component, posterior spinal fixation sys…
U&I Corp., America20035

Also cleared against K063708: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • 2 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K063708.

How does its category compare?

All MNH devices

MNH Orthosis, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MNH

8in 2016

2007: 52008: 132009: 132010: 102011: 172012: 72013: 102014: 122015: 102016: 8
2007high 17 (2011) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MNH

93in 2016

2007: 123 days median2008: 65 days median2009: 151 days median2010: 106 days median2011: 171 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 124 days median2014: 140 days median2015: 99 days median2016: 93 days median
2007high 171 (2011) · low 65 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MNH

1in 2016

2009: 72012: 12013: 12016: 1
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MNH

89in 2025

2007: 182008: 302009: 452010: 592011: 1072012: 4332013: 4642014: 2862015: 1522016: 2162017: 1742018: 1292019: 4032020: 4322021: 5312022: 2652023: 1212024: 3022025: 89
2007high 531 (2021) · low 18 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MNH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075123018
20081365030
200913151745
201010106059
2011171710107
20127931433
2013101241464
2014121400286
201510990152
20168931216
20170—0174
20180—0129
20190—0403
20200—0432
20210—0531
20220—0265
20230—0121
20240—0302
20250—089
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

NORM spinal system implants are designed to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following indications of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). Levels of fixation are for…

Read the full statement (127 words)

NORM spinal system implants are designed to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following indications of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine:

degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment;

fracture;

dislocation;

scoliosis;

kyphosis;

spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

Levels of fixation are for the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. Norm Posterior Spinal System is also indicated for pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S 1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogeneous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attachment of a solid fusion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K092011: Norm Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K092011

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026