510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Esl Spinal System

K092574510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 4, 2010167-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ebi, L.P. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Feb 4, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K040928 (Interpore Cross Intl., 2004) and 2 other predicates after a 167-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 2001. 181 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 4, 2010
Review
167 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K010530 (2001). 13 ancestors in all, the oldest P950002 (1996). 181 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 other ancestor2004: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor2011: 2 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2017: 7 descendants cleared2024: 29 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2021: 14 descendants cleared2019: 13 descendants cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2020: 12 descendants cleared2023: 22 descendants cleared2022: 16 descendants cleared2026: 28 descendants cleared2025: 29 descendants clearedK010530 · Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 2001K062083 · Synfix -LR · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007K072253 · Synfix-LR Spacer · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · recalled×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K073470 (2008), K080758 (2008) K081636 · Peek-Optima Alif Spacer · Biomet Spine · 2008K082406 · Expandable Peek-Optima Implant · Ebi, L.P. · 20091995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors4 generations back: 3 other ancestors5 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 5 descendants3 generations forward: 5 descendants4 generations forward: 11 descendants5 generations forward: 22 descendants6 generations forward: 25 descendants7 generations forward: 13 descendants8 generations forward: 8 descendants9 generations forward: 13 descendants10 generations forward: 24 descendants11 generations forward: 29 descendants12 generations forward: 16 descendants13 generations forward: 6 descendants14 generations forward: 1 descendant K082406 · Expandable Peek-Optima Implant · Ebi, L.P. · 2009K081636 · Peek-Optima Alif Spacer · Biomet Spine · 2008K080758 · Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351 and 48353 · Stryker Corp. · 2008K073470 · Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351XXX and 48353XXX · Stryker Spine · 2008K072253 · Synfix-LR Spacer · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · recalledK062083 · Synfix -LR · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007K010530 · Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 2001−50+5+10
  1. Root · 7 generations backK010530 Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl. · 2001
  2. 6 generations backK062083 Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007
  3. 5 generations backK072253 Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · Recalled
  4. 4 generations backK073470 Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351XXX and 48353XXXStryker Spine · 2008
  5. 3 generations backK080758 Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351 and 48353Stryker Corp. · 2008
  6. 2 generations backK081636 Peek-Optima Alif SpacerBiomet Spine · 2008
  7. 1 generation backK082406 Expandable Peek-Optima ImplantEbi, L.P. · 2009
  8. This deviceK092574 Esl Spinal SystemEbi, L.P. · 2010
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 177 of its ownK110650 Zyston Arc Interbody SpacerBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC) · 2011
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 174 of its ownK112014 Zyston Straight Spacer SystemBiomet Spine · 2011
  11. Descendant · cites it directly · 171 of its ownK122989 Biomet Lateral Spacer SystemBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC) · 2012
  12. Descendant · 2 generations on · 169 of its ownK151310 Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc. · 2016
  13. Descendant · 3 generations on · 166 of its ownK160924 Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc. · 2016

Showing 5 of 181 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 22012: 12013: 12016: 22017: 72018: 52019: 132020: 122021: 142022: 162023: 222024: 292025: 292026: 28
2011high 29 (2024) · low 0 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 181 · See all
  • K110650Zyston Arc Interbody SpacerBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC) · 2011 · cites it directly177descendants
  • K112014Zyston Straight Spacer SystemBiomet Spine · 2011 · cites it directly174descendants
  • K122989Biomet Lateral Spacer SystemBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC) · 2012 · cites it directly171descendants
  • K151310Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc. · 2016 · 2 generations on169descendants
  • K160924Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc. · 2016 · 3 generations on166descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K010530Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl.2001—
−6K062083Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp2007—
−5K072253Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp20071
−4K073470Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351XXX and 48353XXXStryker Spine2008—
−3K080758Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351 and 48353Stryker Corp.2008—
−2K081636Peek-Optima Alif SpacerBiomet Spine2008—
−1K082406Expandable Peek-Optima ImplantEbi, L.P.2009—
0 (this device)K092574Esl Spinal SystemEbi, L.P.2010—
+1K110650Zyston Arc Interbody SpacerBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC)2011—
+1K112014Zyston Straight Spacer SystemBiomet Spine2011—
+1K122989Biomet Lateral Spacer SystemBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC)2012—
+2K151310Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc.2016—
+3K160924Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199910
200210
200410
200610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201120
201210
201310
201620
201770
201850
2019130
2020120
2021140
2022160
2023220
2024290
2025290
2026280
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K092574, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K040928Expandable Peek VBR Implant
Summary page 1
…ues of safety or effectiveness. An example of a predicate intervertebral body fusion device distributed for the similar indications includes the Expandable PEEK Implant (K040928 and K082406) and the ESL® Spinal System (K061016) has similar design features. Based upon the mechanical testing, ESLt Spinal Sys…
Interpore Cross Intl.2004—
*K082406Expandable Peek-Optima Implant
Summary page 1
…y or effectiveness. An example of a predicate intervertebral body fusion device distributed for the similar indications includes the Expandable PEEK Implant (K040928 and K082406) and the ESL® Spinal System (K061016) has similar design features. Based upon the mechanical testing, ESLt Spinal System is subst…
Ebi, L.P.2009—
*K061016Ebi Esl Peek-Optima Spine System
Summary page 1
…redicate intervertebral body fusion device distributed for the similar indications includes the Expandable PEEK Implant (K040928 and K082406) and the ESL® Spinal System (K061016) has similar design features. Based upon the mechanical testing, ESLt Spinal System is substantially equivalent for its intended…
Ebi, L.P.2006—

Also cleared against K040928: 9 other devices →

What descends from it? (181)

See all 181

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K110650Zyston Arc Interbody SpacerBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC)2011177
K112014Zyston Straight Spacer SystemBiomet Spine2011174
K122989Biomet Lateral Spacer SystemBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC)2012171

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5 months on median.
  • 2 of the 13 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K110650 (Biomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC), 2011) has gone furthest, with 177 descendants of its own.
  • 9 other devices also cite its predicate K040928.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The ESL® Spinal System is indicated for vertebral body replacement and intervertebral fusion. When used for vertebral body replacement, the ESL® Spinal System is indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (i.e., T1 - L5) for partial replacement of a diseased vertebral body resected or excised for the treatment of tumors in order to achieve anterior decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues, and to restore the height of a collapsed vertebral…

Read the full statement (260 words)

The ESL® Spinal System is indicated for vertebral body replacement and intervertebral fusion. When used for vertebral body replacement, the ESL® Spinal System is indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (i.e., T1 - L5) for partial replacement of a diseased vertebral body resected or excised for the treatment of tumors in order to achieve anterior decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues, and to restore the height of a collapsed vertebral body. The ESL® Spinal System is also indicated for treating fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. The ESL® Spinal System is designed to restore the biomechanical integrity of the anterior, middle, and posterior spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period of time.

As an intervertebral body fusion device, the ESL® Spinal System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion at one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2 to S1 in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months, of non-operative treatment.

The ESL® Spinal System is designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion and is intended for use with supplemental fixation systems cleared for use in the lumbar spine. The ESL® Spinal System may also be implanted using the Accuvision System to provide the surgeon with a minimally invasive approach for posterior or posterolateral spinal surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K092574: Esl Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K092574

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026