510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Capri Applicator

K092822510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 3, 200950-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5700

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vivaray, Inc. · JAQ System, Applicator, Radionuclide, Remote-Controlled

Cleared on Nov 3, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K061241 (Biolucent, Inc., 2006) and 1 other predicate after a 50-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1986. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 3, 2009
Review
50 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAQ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K864210 (1986). 9 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor1993: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor2014: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant clearedK864210 · Microselectron-HDR (High Dose Rate) · Nucletron-Oldelft Corp. · 1986K953946 · Microselectron-HDR Version 2 · Nucletron-Oldelft Corp. · 1996K020015 · Implant Guidance System Applicator Set · Nucletron Corp. · 2002K032372 · Nucletron Comfort Catheter System, Model 189.007 · Nucletron Corporation · 2003K061241 · Biolucent Applicator, Model Rta-XX · Biolucent, Inc. · 20061990200020102020
  1. Root · 5 generations backK864210 Microselectron-HDR (High Dose Rate)Nucletron-Oldelft Corp. · 1986
  2. 4 generations backK953946 Microselectron-HDR Version 2Nucletron-Oldelft Corp. · 1996
  3. 3 generations backK020015 Implant Guidance System Applicator SetNucletron Corp. · 2002
  4. 2 generations backK032372 Nucletron Comfort Catheter System, Model 189.007Nucletron Corporation · 2003
  5. 1 generation backK061241 Biolucent Applicator, Model Rta-XXBiolucent, Inc. · 2006
  6. This deviceK092822 Capri ApplicatorVivaray, Inc. · 2009
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK133922 Gentlecare AR ApplicatorGc Medtech, LLC · 2014
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK120344 Radiapak Brachytherapy Applicator Balloon DeviceRadiadyne, LLC (Specification Developer) · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K133922Gentlecare AR ApplicatorGc Medtech, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K120344Radiapak Brachytherapy Applicator Balloon DeviceRadiadyne, LLC (Specification Developer) · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K864210Microselectron-HDR (High Dose Rate)Nucletron-Oldelft Corp.1986—
−4K953946Microselectron-HDR Version 2Nucletron-Oldelft Corp.1996—
−3K020015Implant Guidance System Applicator SetNucletron Corp.2002—
−2K032372Nucletron Comfort Catheter System, Model 189.007Nucletron Corporation2003—
−1K061241Biolucent Applicator, Model Rta-XXBiolucent, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K092822Capri ApplicatorVivaray, Inc.2009—
+1K133922Gentlecare AR ApplicatorGc Medtech, LLC2014—
+1K120344Radiapak Brachytherapy Applicator Balloon DeviceRadiadyne, LLC (Specification Developer)2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
199310
199610
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K092822, 1986–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAQ device

  1. #1 K241853 Titanium Fletcher-Style Applicator Set Defined…score 14.9 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K061241Biolucent Applicator, Model Rta-XX
Summary page 1
…892.5700 DEVICE Class II CLASSIFICATION: PRODUCT CODE JAQ PREDICATE DEVICES: BioLucent's Applicator (K061241) Nucletron's Miami Applicator (K953946) Substantially Equivalent To: The CAPRI Applicator is substantial…
Biolucent, Inc.2006—
*K953946Microselectron-HDR Version 2
Summary page 1
…s II CLASSIFICATION: PRODUCT CODE JAQ PREDICATE DEVICES: BioLucent's Applicator (K061241) Nucletron's Miami Applicator (K953946) Substantially Equivalent To: The CAPRI Applicator is substantially equivalent in intended use, principal of operation and tech…
Nucletron-Oldelft Corp.1996—

Also cleared against K061241: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K133922Gentlecare AR ApplicatorGc Medtech, LLC20140
K120344Radiapak Brachytherapy Applicator Balloon DeviceRadiadyne, LLC (Specification Developer)20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.3 years on median.
  • None of the 9 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K133922 (Gc Medtech, LLC, 2014) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K061241.

How does its category compare?

All JAQ devices

JAQ System, Applicator, Radionuclide, Remote-Controlled: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAQ

6in 2025

2007: 112008: 102009: 102010: 22011: 22012: 72013: 62014: 72015: 112016: 62017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42022: 12023: 22024: 102025: 62026 (partial year): 2
2007high 11 (2007) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAQ

91in 2025

2007: 48 days median2008: 34 days median2009: 27 days median2012: 89 days median2013: 100 days median2014: 116 days median2015: 183 days median2016: 154 days median2017: 229 days median2018: 252 days median2020: 62 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 91 days median
2007high 252 (2018) · low 27 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAQ

1in 2019

2008: 52009: 12010: 22011: 132012: 52013: 12019: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 13 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAQ

3in 2025

2007: 132008: 322009: 352010: 362011: 422012: 342013: 432014: 182015: 72016: 32017: 52018: 22019: 82020: 82021: 52022: 52023: 32024: 12025: 3
2007high 43 (2013) · low 1 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071148013
20081034532
20091027135
20102—236
20112—1342
2012789534
20136100143
20147116018
20151118307
2016615403
2017722905
2018725202
20192—18
202046208
20210—05
20221—05
20232—03
20241012601
202569103
20262—3—

What is it indicated for?

The CAPRITM Applicator is intended for use during brachytherapy procedures. The multiple lumens of the CAPRI Applicator are intended to provide pathways from which a prescribed radiation dose is delivered to the treatment area.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K092822: Capri Applicator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K092822

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026