510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Hairmax Lasercomb

K093499510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 23, 200911-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lexington International, LLC · OAP Laser, Comb, Hair

Cleared on Nov 23, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K060305 (Lexington International, LLC, 2007) after an 11-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2007. 82 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 23, 2009
Review
11 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OAP
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K060305 (2007). 82 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2017: 6 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2023: 7 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2019: 7 descendants cleared2018: 12 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2024: 10 descendants cleared2020: 8 descendants cleared2022: 5 descendants cleared2026: 7 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2025: 6 descendants clearedK060305 · Hairmax Lasercomb · Lexington International, LLC · 200720052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 6 descendants3 generations forward: 22 descendants4 generations forward: 27 descendants5 generations forward: 18 descendants6 generations forward: 5 descendants7 generations forward: 2 descendants8 generations forward: 1 descendant K060305 · Hairmax Lasercomb · Lexington International, LLC · 20070+5
  1. Root · 1 generation backK060305 Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2007
  2. This deviceK093499 Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2009
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 81 of its ownK103368 Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2011
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 73 of its ownK142573 HairMax LaserComb, HairMax LaserCombLexington International, LLC · 2014
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 59 of its ownK160285 Capillus272 Pro, Capillus272 OfficePro, Capillus82, Capillus202Capillus, LLC · 2016
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 51 of its ownK163170 Capillus 82, Capillus 202, Capillus 272 Pro, 272 Office Pro…Capillus, LLC · 2017
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 35 of its ownK162071 IllumiFlow Laser CapEglobal, LLC · 2017

Showing 5 of 82 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 22013: 12014: 12015: 12016: 52017: 62018: 122019: 72020: 82021: 42022: 52023: 72024: 102025: 62026: 7
2011high 12 (2018) · low 0 (2012)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 82 · See all
  • K103368Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2011 · cites it directly81descendants
  • K142573HairMax LaserComb, HairMax LaserCombLexington International, LLC · 2014 · 2 generations on73descendants
  • K160285Capillus272 Pro, Capillus272 OfficePro, Capillus82, Capillus202Capillus, LLC · 2016 · 3 generations on59descendants
  • K163170Capillus 82, Capillus 202, Capillus 272 Pro, 272 Office Pro, Capillus 302, Capillus 312…Capillus, LLC · 2017 · 2 generations on51descendants
  • K162071IllumiFlow Laser CapEglobal, LLC · 2017 · 4 generations on35descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K060305Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC2007—
0 (this device)K093499Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC2009—
+1K103368Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC2011—
+2K142573HairMax LaserComb, HairMax LaserCombLexington International, LLC2014—
+3K160285Capillus272 Pro, Capillus272 OfficePro, Capillus82, Capillus202Capillus, LLC2016—
+2K163170Capillus 82, Capillus 202, Capillus 272 Pro, 272 Office Pro, Capillus 302…Capillus, LLC2017—
+4K162071IllumiFlow Laser CapEglobal, LLC2017—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201120
201310
201410
201510
201650
201760
2018120
201970
202080
202140
202250
202370
2024100
202560
202670
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K093499, 2007–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OAP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OAP device

  1. #1 K222790 F65 Laser Systemscore 20.5 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K060305Hairmax Lasercomb
Summary page 2
…e 105 Internation~alLL- Boca Raton, FL. 33431 Classification Name: 21 CFR 890.5500 Infrared lamp Predicate Device: HairMax LaserComb K060305 November 9, 2009 Device Description: Similar to the HairMax LaserComb K060305, the modified HairMax LaserComb consists…
Lexington International, LLC2007—

Also cleared against K060305: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (82)

See all 82

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K103368Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC201181

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K103368 (Lexington International, LLC, 2011) has gone furthest, with 81 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K060305.

How does its category compare?

All OAP devices

OAP Laser, Comb, Hair: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OAP

6in 2025

2007: 12009: 12010: 12011: 42012: 22013: 32014: 32015: 82016: 82017: 52018: 152019: 92020: 92021: 52022: 82023: 82024: 102025: 62026 (partial year): 9
2007high 15 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OAP

87in 2025

2011: 89 days median2013: 262 days median2014: 80 days median2015: 126 days median2016: 83 days median2017: 83 days median2018: 87 days median2019: 89 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 89 days median2022: 99 days median2023: 81 days median2024: 94 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 83 days median
2007high 262 (2013) · low 80 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OAP

No recall names OAP since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OAP

11in 2025

2011: 12013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 42021: 32022: 22024: 12025: 11
2007high 11 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OAP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20091—00
20101—00
201148901
20122—00
2013326201
201438000
2015812602
201688301
201758301
2018158701
201998904
202098800
202158903
202289902
202388100
2024109401
2025687011
20269830—

What is it indicated for?

The HairMax LaserComb is indicated to promote hair growth in males, 30-60 years of age with androgenetic alopecia who have Norwood Hamilton Classifications of IIa to V patterns of hair loss and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K093499: Hairmax Lasercomb.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093499

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026