510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

COSP2

K093721510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 19, 201079-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

3M Espe AG Dental Products · MVL Cord, Retraction

Cleared on Feb 19, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K050180 (Produits Dentaires Pierre Rolland, 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 79-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2005.

Decided
Feb 19, 2010
Review
79 days
Class
Class U
Product code
MVL
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K050180 (2005). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK050180 Expa-SylProduits Dentaires Pierre Rolland · 2005
  2. 1 generation backK082116 Hemostasyl PasteSatelec · 2008
  3. This deviceK093721 COSP23M Espe AG Dental Products · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K050180Expa-SylProduits Dentaires Pierre Rolland2005—
−1K082116Hemostasyl PasteSatelec2008—
0 (this device)K093721COSP23M Espe AG Dental Products2010—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K093721, 2005–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MVL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MVL device

  1. #1 K254239 CyClean Cordscore 11.4 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K050180Expa-Syl
Summary page 1
…ation Name: .......................... Unclassified Product code.................................MVL Predicate Devices Expasyl.....................................K050180 by Produits Dentaires Pierre Rolland Hemostasyl Paste.............................K082 116 by Produits Dentaires Pierre Rolland…
Produits Dentaires Pierre Rolland2005—
*K082116Hemostasyl Paste
Summary page 1
…..........MVL Predicate Devices Expasyl.....................................K050180 by Produits Dentaires Pierre Rolland Hemostasyl Paste.............................K082 116 by Produits Dentaires Pierre Rolland Description for the Premarket Notification CoSP2, manufactured by 3M ESPE,…
Satelec2008—

Also cleared against K050180: 6 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 5 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.8 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K050180.

How does its category compare?

All MVL devices

MVL Cord, Retraction: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MVL

1in 2025

2008: 12009: 32010: 42011: 22012: 12013: 22014: 22015: 22017: 42018: 12019: 12020: 22021: 12022: 22025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MVL

227in 2017

2009: 91 days median2010: 79 days median2017: 227 days median
2007high 227 (2017) · low 79 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MVL

1so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2026 (partial year): 1
2007high 1 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MVL

1in 2025

2009: 12010: 12012: 72013: 52014: 22021: 32022: 12024: 12025: 1
2007high 7 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MVL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20081—00
200939101
201047901
20112—00
20121—07
20132—05
20142—02
20152—00
20160—00
2017422700
20181—00
20191—00
20202—00
20211—03
20222—01
20230—00
20240—01
20251—01
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

All indications for displacement of the marginal gingiva and to provide for a dry sulcus when the periodontium is healthy.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K093721: COSP2.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093721

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026