510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Compact Touch

K094038510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 22, 2010113-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Quantel S.A. · IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Apr 22, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K051851 (Quantel Medical, 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 113-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1993. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 22, 2010
Review
113 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K926251 (1993). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K920906 (1992). 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 2 other ancestors1992: 2 other ancestors2010: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant clearedK926251 · B-Scan Opthalmic Ultrasound Imaging System · Biovision, Inc. · 1993K021683 · Cinescan S · Quantel Medical · 2002K051851 · Aviso Ophthalmic Ultrasound System · Quantel Medical · 20051990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors3 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K051851 · Aviso Ophthalmic Ultrasound System · Quantel Medical · 2005K021683 · Cinescan S · Quantel Medical · 2002K926251 · B-Scan Opthalmic Ultrasound Imaging System · Biovision, Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 3 generations backK926251 B-Scan Opthalmic Ultrasound Imaging SystemBiovision, Inc. · 1993
  2. 2 generations backK021683 Cinescan SQuantel Medical · 2002
  3. 1 generation backK051851 Aviso Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical · 2005
  4. This deviceK094038 Compact TouchQuantel S.A. · 2010
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK180265 COMPACT TOUCH Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical · 2018
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK213254 Axialis Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical · 2021
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK102027 Axis Nano Opthalmic Biometer Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical S.A. · 2010

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K180265COMPACT TOUCH Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical · 2018 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K213254Axialis Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical · 2021 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K102027Axis Nano Opthalmic Biometer Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical S.A. · 2010 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K926251B-Scan Opthalmic Ultrasound Imaging SystemBiovision, Inc.1993—
−2K021683Cinescan SQuantel Medical2002—
−1K051851Aviso Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical2005—
0 (this device)K094038Compact TouchQuantel S.A.2010—
+1K180265COMPACT TOUCH Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical2018—
+2K213254Axialis Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical2021—
+1K102027Axis Nano Opthalmic Biometer Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical S.A.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199220
200020

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201810
202110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K094038, 1993–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYO device

  1. #1 K243937 Accuro 3Sscore 20.5 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051851Aviso Ophthalmic Ultrasound System
Summary page 2
…redicate Devices [21 CFR 807.92(a)(3)] The Compact TOUCH uses similar technology and physical output characteristics as the following predicate devices: k051851 Quantel Medical A VISO Ophthalmic Ultrasound System k993674 Quantel Medical POCKET Ultrasonic Pachymeter E. Device Descr…
Quantel Medical2005—
*K993674Pocket Ultrasonic Pachymeter
Summary page 2
…s similar technology and physical output characteristics as the following predicate devices: k051851 Quantel Medical A VISO Ophthalmic Ultrasound System k993674 Quantel Medical POCKET Ultrasonic Pachymeter E. Device Description [21 CFR 807.92(a)(4)] The Compact TOUCH is an ultraso…
Quantel Medical2000—

Also cleared against K051851: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K180265COMPACT TOUCH Ophthalmic Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical20181
K102027Axis Nano Opthalmic Biometer Ultrasound SystemQuantel Medical S.A.20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.7 years on median.
  • None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K180265 (Quantel Medical, 2018) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K051851.

How does its category compare?

All IYO devices

IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYO

7in 2025

2007: 202008: 142009: 132010: 152011: 112012: 152013: 172014: 142015: 192016: 102017: 192018: 142019: 132020: 112021: 152022: 52023: 112024: 102025: 72026 (partial year): 10
2007high 20 (2007) · low 5 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYO

171in 2025

2007: 17 days median2008: 36 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 69 days median2012: 68 days median2013: 50 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 46 days median2016: 36 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 59 days median2020: 57 days median2021: 64 days median2022: 190 days median2023: 177 days median2024: 220 days median2025: 171 days median2026 (partial year): 139 days median
2007high 220 (2024) · low 17 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYO

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 52009: 92010: 82012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 112022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2021) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYO

485in 2025

2007: 392008: 202009: 272010: 202011: 582012: 782013: 4362014: 3042015: 2682016: 2542017: 2382018: 3682019: 5372020: 4982021: 6172022: 5112023: 5272024: 6402025: 485
2007high 640 (2024) · low 20 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072017439
20081436520
20091379927
201015113820
20111169058
20121568278
201317503436
201414632304
201519461268
201610360254
201719720238
201814561368
201913591537
202011570498
2021156411617
202251901511
2023111770527
2024102200640
202571710485
2026101391—

What is it indicated for?

The QUANTEL MEDICAL Compact TOUCH Ophthalmic Ultrasound System and the probes that are used with it are indicated for diagnostic imaging and biometric measurement of the eye including:

* Visualization of the interior of the eye and the orbit by A and B scans.

* Axial Length measurement of the eye by ultrasonic means.

* Implanted IOL power calculation, using the Axial Length measurement.

* Measurement of corneal thickness by ultrasonic means.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K094038: Compact Touch.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K094038

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026