510(k) · Cleared
ClearedThermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Reagents, Calibrators and Controls
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Microgenics Corp. · OUF Everolimus Immunoassay
Cleared on Feb 11, 2011 as substantially equivalent to DEN040008 (Microgenics Corp., 2004) after a 388-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2004. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Feb 11, 2011
- Review
- 388 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- OUF
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to DEN040008 (2004). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backDEN040008 Cedia Sirolimus AssayMicrogenics Corp. · 2004
- This deviceK100144 Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Reagents, Calibrators and ControlsMicrogenics Corp. · 2011
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK122766 Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus AssayMicrogenics Corp. · 2013 · Recalled
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K122766Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus AssayMicrogenics Corp. · 2013 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | DEN040008 | Cedia Sirolimus Assay | Microgenics Corp. | 2004 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K100144 | Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Reagents, Calibrators and Controls | Microgenics Corp. | 2011 | — |
| +1 | K122766 | Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Assay | Microgenics Corp. | 2013 | 1 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in OUF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | DEN040008 | Cedia Sirolimus Assay Our reading of the summary gave K034069, which is not in FDA’s 510(k) list. The device the summary names is FDA’s De Novo DEN040008, Cedia Sirolimus Assay (Microgenics Corp.), granted Jul 28, 2004; older De Novo requests were first filed under a 510(k) number, so this links to the grant. | 2004 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K122766 | Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Assay | 2013 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All OUF devicesOUF Everolimus Immunoassay: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · OUF
1in 2013
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · OUF
Too few OUF 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · OUF
1in 2016
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · OUF
1in 2017
MAUDE reports naming product code OUF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The OMS® Everolimus assay is intended for the quantitative determination of everolimus, the active ingredient of Zortresso in human whole blood on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. The results obtained are used as an aid in the management of kidney transplant patients receiving Everolimus therapy. This in vitro diagnostic device is intended for clinical laboratory use only.
The OMS®9 Everolimus Calibrator set is intended for use in calibration of the QMS® Everolimus Assay.
The OMSO Everolimus Control set is intended for use in quality control of the QMS® Everolimus Assay.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K100144 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K100144: Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Reagents, Calibrators and Controls.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100144
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026