510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Fora V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring System

K100406510(k) SpecialCleared May 11, 201084-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.1345

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Taidoc Technology Corporation · CGA Glucose Oxidase, Glucose

Cleared on May 11, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K083664 (Taidoc Technology Corporation, 2009) after an 84-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2009. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 11, 2010
Review
84 days
Class
Class II
Product code
CGA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K083664 (2009). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant clearedK083664 · Fora TD-4245 Blood Glucose Monitoring System, TD-4245 · Taidoc Technology Corporation · 200920052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K083664 · Fora TD-4245 Blood Glucose Monitoring System, TD-4245 · Taidoc Technology Corporation · 20090
  1. Root · 1 generation backK083664 Fora TD-4245 Blood Glucose Monitoring System, TD-4245Taidoc Technology Corporation · 2009
  2. This deviceK100406 Fora V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemTaidoc Technology Corporation · 2010
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK102049 Clever Choice Voice+ Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemTaidoc Technology Corporation · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K102049Clever Choice Voice+ Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemTaidoc Technology Corporation · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K083664Fora TD-4245 Blood Glucose Monitoring System, TD-4245Taidoc Technology Corporation2009—
0 (this device)K100406Fora V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemTaidoc Technology Corporation2010—
+1K102049Clever Choice Voice+ Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemTaidoc Technology Corporation2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K100406, 2009–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in CGA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new CGA device

  1. #1 K252488 ABL90 FLEX PLUS Systemscore 12.8 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K083664Fora TD-4245 Blood Glucose Monitoring System, TD-4245
Summary page 2
…se Monitoring System. 5. Substantial Equivalence Information: A. Predicate device name: FORA TD-4245 Blood Glucose Monitoring System B. Predicate K number: K083664 C. Comparison wvith predicate: The modified FOPRA V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems has the following similaritie…
Taidoc Technology Corporation2009—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102049Clever Choice Voice+ Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemTaidoc Technology Corporation20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K102049 (Taidoc Technology Corporation, 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All CGA devices

CGA Glucose Oxidase, Glucose: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · CGA

2in 2024

2007: 72008: 62009: 102010: 82011: 92012: 102013: 32014: 52015: 42016: 42017: 22018: 22019: 22020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 42024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 10 (2009) · low 0 (2025)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · CGA

249in 2023

2007: 122 days median2008: 56 days median2009: 155 days median2010: 122 days median2011: 217 days median2012: 123 days median2013: 441 days median2014: 265 days median2015: 150 days median2016: 157 days median2023: 249 days median
2007high 441 (2013) · low 56 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · CGA

3in 2023

2007: 22008: 22009: 42010: 62011: 32013: 32014: 22015: 6, 2 Class I2016: 22019: 12023: 3
2007high 6 (2010) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CGA

59in 2025

2007: 292008: 372009: 752010: 1722011: 4232012: 2332013: 1722014: 1222015: 1552016: 362017: 922018: 692019: 1162020: 682021: 482022: 2722023: 1,1412024: 2662025: 59
2007high 1,141 (2023) · low 29 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CGA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077122229
2008656237
200910155475
201081226172
201192173423
2012101230233
201334413172
201452652122
201541506 (2)155
20164157236
20172—092
20182—069
20192—1116
20202—068
20211—048
20221—0272
2023424931,141
20242—0266
20250—059
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The FORA V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of…

Read the full statement (131 words)

The FORA V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, and is not intended for use on neonates.

The alternative site testing in the FORA V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring System can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions.

The FORA V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring System contains a speaking functionality which provides step by step instructions to aid visually impaired persons.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K100406: Fora V20 Blood Glucose Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100406

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026