510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Eli 150 Electrocardiograph Model Eli 150

K101115510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Jun 18, 201058-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2340Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mortara Instrument, Inc. · DPS Electrocardiograph

Cleared on Jun 18, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K920627 (Mortara Instrument, Inc., 1992) and 1 other predicate after a 58-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 18, 2010
Review
58 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DPS
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K933143 (1994). 4 ancestors in all, the oldest K920627 (1992). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK933143 Model Eli 300 ElectrocardiographMortara Instrument, Inc. · 1994
  2. 2 generations backK062677 Eli 350 ElectrocardiographMortara Instrument, Inc. · 2006
  3. 1 generation backK082946 Mortara Eli 350 ElectrocardiographMortara Instrument, Inc. · 2008
  4. This deviceK101115 Eli 150 Electrocardiograph Model Eli 150Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K933143Model Eli 300 ElectrocardiographMortara Instrument, Inc.1994—
−2K062677Eli 350 ElectrocardiographMortara Instrument, Inc.2006—
−1K082946Mortara Eli 350 ElectrocardiographMortara Instrument, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K101115Eli 150 Electrocardiograph Model Eli 150Mortara Instrument, Inc.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K101115, 1994–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DPS device

  1. #1 K212112 Cardiologs Holter Platformscore 18.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K920627Model Eli 100 Electrocardiograph
Summary page 1
…s ELI 150 Electrocardiograph is the next generation and is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device: * ELI 100 by Mortara Instrument (K920627) * ELI 350 by Mortara Instrument (K082946) The proposed ELI 150 is a modification of the Mortara predicate device. It…
Mortara Instrument, Inc.1992—
*K082946Mortara Eli 350 Electrocardiograph
Summary page 1
…nd is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device: * ELI 100 by Mortara Instrument (K920627) * ELI 350 by Mortara Instrument (K082946) The proposed ELI 150 is a modification of the Mortara predicate device. It will include the addition of Pediatric Criteria for t…
Mortara Instrument, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K920627: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 18, 2020Class IIZ-1810-2020Device DesignImpacted Welch Allyn products may not meet the Defibrillation Withstand requirements of EN/IEC 60601-2-25 Medical Electrical Equipment.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K920627.

How does its category compare?

All DPS devices

DPS Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DPS

6in 2025

2007: 112008: 132009: 142010: 112011: 222012: 122013: 102014: 112015: 82016: 112017: 92018: 142019: 32020: 62021: 52022: 62023: 102024: 82025: 62026 (partial year): 6
2007high 22 (2011) · low 3 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DPS

163in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 31 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 104 days median2011: 154 days median2012: 117 days median2013: 134 days median2014: 253 days median2015: 178 days median2016: 229 days median2017: 177 days median2018: 221 days median2019: 178 days median2020: 224 days median2021: 135 days median2022: 244 days median2023: 236 days median2024: 260 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 258 days median
2007high 260 (2024) · low 31 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DPS

3in 2025

2007: 22009: 12010: 22011: 12019: 92020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 32024: 4, 1 Class I2025: 32026 (partial year): 4
2007high 9 (2019) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DPS

55in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 142010: 212011: 1212012: 562013: 152014: 152015: 302016: 122017: 152018: 192019: 272020: 592021: 242022: 592023: 542024: 642025: 55
2007high 121 (2011) · low 9 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007118729
20081331017
20091484114
201011104221
2011221541121
201212117056
201310134015
201411253015
20158178030
201611229012
20179177015
201814221019
20193178927
20206224259
20215135124
20226244159
202310236354
202482604 (1)64
20256163355
202662584—

What is it indicated for?

The device is indicated for use to acquire, analyze, display and print electrocardiograms. The device is indicated for use to provide interpretation of the data for consideration by a physician. The device is indicated for use in a clinical setting, by a physician or by trained personnel who are acting on the orders of a licensed physician. It is not intended as a sole means of diagnosis. The interpretations of EGG offered by the device are only…

Read the full statement (121 words)

The device is indicated for use to acquire, analyze, display and print electrocardiograms.

The device is indicated for use to provide interpretation of the data for consideration by a physician.

The device is indicated for use in a clinical setting, by a physician or by trained personnel who are acting on the orders of a licensed physician. It is not intended as a sole means of diagnosis.

The interpretations of EGG offered by the device are only significant when used in conjunction with a physician over-read as well as consideration of all other relevant patient data.

The device is indicated for use on adult and pediatric populations.

The device is not intended to be used as a vital signs physiological monitor.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K101115: Eli 150 Electrocardiograph Model Eli 150.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K101115

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026