510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Advanced Glass Ionomer (K-130) Restorative

K101493510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 19, 201079-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3275

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Dentsply International, Inc. · EMA Cement, Dental

Cleared on Aug 19, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K960954 (Espe GmbH & Co. Kg., 1996) after a 79-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1984.

Decided
Aug 19, 2010
Review
79 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EMA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K843566 (1984). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1988: 1 other ancestorK843566 · Ketac-Silver · Espe GmbH (Us) · 1984K960954 · Ketac-Molar Aplicap · Espe GmbH & Co. Kg. · 19961980198519901995200020052010
Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K960954 · Ketac-Molar Aplicap · Espe GmbH & Co. Kg. · 1996K843566 · Ketac-Silver · Espe GmbH (Us) · 19840
  1. Root · 2 generations backK843566 Ketac-SilverEspe GmbH (Us) · 1984
  2. 1 generation backK960954 Ketac-Molar AplicapEspe GmbH & Co. Kg. · 1996
  3. This deviceK101493 Advanced Glass Ionomer (K-130) RestorativeDentsply International, Inc. · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K843566Ketac-SilverEspe GmbH (Us)1984—
−1K960954Ketac-Molar AplicapEspe GmbH & Co. Kg.1996—
0 (this device)K101493Advanced Glass Ionomer (K-130) RestorativeDentsply International, Inc.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K101493, 1984–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device

  1. #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960954Ketac-Molar Aplicap
Summary page 1
…II - * Product Code: EMA 3. Predicate Device: 3M Ketac-Molar Aplicap (K960954) 4. Description of Device: Advanced Glass lonomer (K-I1 30) is a fast-setting, high viscosity radiopaque c…
Espe GmbH & Co. Kg.1996—

Also cleared against K960954: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 14.3 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K960954.

How does its category compare?

All EMA devices

EMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EMA

10in 2025

2007: 62008: 132009: 102010: 142011: 82012: 102013: 122014: 42015: 92016: 102017: 32018: 32019: 72020: 82021: 42022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 102026 (partial year): 7
2007high 14 (2010) · low 2 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EMA

106in 2025

2007: 48 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 86 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 128 days median2013: 178 days median2014: 174 days median2015: 134 days median2016: 182 days median2017: 141 days median2018: 237 days median2019: 127 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 184 days median2022: 245 days median2024: 59 days median2025: 106 days median2026 (partial year): 150 days median
2007high 245 (2022) · low 48 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EMA

1in 2023

2008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 52023: 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EMA

9in 2025

2007: 332008: 502009: 902010: 1062011: 2242012: 2492013: 3852014: 2072015: 852016: 162017: 132018: 42019: 122020: 52021: 82022: 32023: 62024: 52025: 9
2007high 385 (2013) · low 3 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007648033
20081371250
20091086190
201014861106
20118795224
2012101280249
2013121780385
201441740207
20159134085
201610182016
20173141013
2018323704
20197127012
2020816405
2021418408
2022724503
20232—16
202435905
20251010609
202671500—

What is it indicated for?

Advanced Glass Lonorner (K-13O) Restorative Material is indicated for semi-permanent restorations of class I and II cavities in posterior teeth; Restoration of deciduous teeth; Restoration of Class V lesions and cavities; Restoration of Class III cavities; Base! Core-build-up. When used as a core-build-up, 2/3 of the remaining coronal dentine or at least 2mm of circumferential coronal dentine should be left for retention.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K101493: Advanced Glass Ionomer (K-130) Restorative.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K101493

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026