510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2013

TX1 Tissue Removal System

K101561510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 27, 201084-day reviewClass URecalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

American Optisurgical, Inc. · LFL Instrument, Ultrasonic Surgical

Cleared on Aug 27, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K021989 (Integra Neurosciences, 2002) after an 84-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1988. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Aug 27, 2010
Review
84 days
Class
Class U
Product code
LFL
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K884413 (1988). 8 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 2 other ancestors1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant clearedK884413 · Cusa System 200H Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator · Valleylab, Inc. · 1988K981262 · Cusa Excel Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator System · Valleylab, Inc. · 1998 · recalledK021989 · Selector Integra Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Model OM 1530000M3 · Integra Neurosciences · 2002 · recalled1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 2 other ancestors3 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant K021989 · Selector Integra Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Model OM 1530000M3 · Integra Neurosciences · 2002 · recalledK981262 · Cusa Excel Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator System · Valleylab, Inc. · 1998 · recalledK884413 · Cusa System 200H Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator · Valleylab, Inc. · 19880
  1. Root · 3 generations backK884413 Cusa System 200H Ultrasonic Surgical AspiratorValleylab, Inc. · 1988
  2. 2 generations backK981262 Cusa Excel Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator SystemValleylab, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
  3. 1 generation backK021989 Selector Integra Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Model OM 1530000M3Integra Neurosciences · 2002 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK101561 TX1 Tissue Removal SystemAmerican Optisurgical, Inc. · 2010
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK123640 TX1 Tissue Removal SystemTenex Health · 2013 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK153299 Tenex Health TX SystemTenex Health, Inc. · 2016
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK212049 Oclet TDS 1000Tendonova Corporation · 2022

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K123640TX1 Tissue Removal SystemTenex Health · 2013 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K153299Tenex Health TX SystemTenex Health, Inc. · 2016 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K212049Oclet TDS 1000Tendonova Corporation · 2022 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K884413Cusa System 200H Ultrasonic Surgical AspiratorValleylab, Inc.1988—
−2K981262Cusa Excel Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator SystemValleylab, Inc.19983
−1K021989Selector Integra Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Model OM 1530000M3Integra Neurosciences20022
0 (this device)K101561TX1 Tissue Removal SystemAmerican Optisurgical, Inc.2010—
+1K123640TX1 Tissue Removal SystemTenex Health20131
+2K153299Tenex Health TX SystemTenex Health, Inc.2016—
+3K212049Oclet TDS 1000Tendonova Corporation2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199210
199410
199510
200120

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
201610
202210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K101561, 1988–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LFL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LFL device

  1. #1 K261448 neXus Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator Systemscore 14.5 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K021989Selector Integra Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Model OM 1530000M3
Summary page 1
…rator Classification Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories (21 CFR 878.4400, Product Code LFL) Predicate device K02 1989, Selector Integra Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator Device description The TX 1 Tissue Removal System is an ultrasonic surgical…
Integra Neurosciences20022

Also cleared against K021989: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K123640TX1 Tissue Removal SystemTenex Health20132

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 30, 2013Class IIZ-1516-2013Device DesignThe recall has been initiated due to an overheating protection voltage suppressor on the redundant safety protection circuit board. Secondary to the recall, American Optisurgical, Inc. will be making a correction to add spacers between…
Feb 22, 2012Class IIZ-1817-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentTwo reasons for recall. 1. Incorrect pressure relief valve installed inside console, leading to a remote chance of a risk to health. 2. Technical Specifications, under Irrigation, the Operating Pressure value is incorrect.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 8.0 years on median.
  • 3 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K123640 (Tenex Health, 2013) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K021989.

How does its category compare?

All LFL devices

LFL Instrument, Ultrasonic Surgical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LFL

3in 2025

2007: 72008: 22009: 12010: 22011: 32012: 32013: 52014: 32015: 42016: 52017: 22018: 32019: 42020: 42021: 62022: 82023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 8 (2022) · low 1 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LFL

176in 2025

2007: 99 days median2011: 241 days median2012: 82 days median2013: 73 days median2014: 136 days median2015: 99 days median2016: 111 days median2018: 66 days median2019: 103 days median2020: 190 days median2021: 83 days median2022: 168 days median2023: 104 days median2024: 158 days median2025: 176 days median2026 (partial year): 99 days median
2007high 241 (2011) · low 66 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LFL

11in 2024

2010: 32011: 22012: 52014: 12015: 12017: 12019: 422021: 12023: 22024: 112026 (partial year): 1
2007high 42 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LFL

3,857in 2025

2007: 2,2362008: 1,6782009: 3,3242010: 1,2392011: 1,0532012: 1,4912013: 2,4302014: 4,2602015: 2,7772016: 2,6912017: 3,2672018: 3,4612019: 3,1532020: 2,9342021: 3,2892022: 3,4222023: 4,2152024: 4,0172025: 3,857
2007high 4,260 (2014) · low 1,053 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LFL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200779902,236
20082—01,678
20091—03,324
20102—31,239
2011324121,053
201238251,491
201357302,430
2014313614,260
201549912,777
2016511102,691
20172—13,267
201836603,461
20194103423,153
2020419002,934
202168313,289
2022816803,422
2023410424,215
20243158114,017
2025317603,857
20263991—

What is it indicated for?

The TX1 Tissue Removal System is indicated for use in surgical procedures where fragmentation, emulsification, and aspiration of soft tissue are desirable, including General Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgery and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K101561: TX1 Tissue Removal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K101561

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026