510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ball Abutment System

K101890510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 3, 2011211-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3630

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Megagen Co., Ltd. · NHA Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous

Cleared on Feb 3, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K063861 (Osstem Implant Co., Ltd., 2007) and 1 other predicate after a 211-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1990.

Decided
Feb 3, 2011
Review
211 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NHA
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K894595 (1990). 18 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 7 generations backK894595 Bonefit R Screw ImplantsInstitut Straumann AG · 1990
  2. 6 generations backK984104 Iti Dental Implant SystemStraumann USA · 1999 · Recalled
  3. 5 generations backK993595 Nobel Biocare's Modified Surface Implant (Intended for Immediate…Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 2000
  4. 4 generations backK011879 3A Dental Implant SystemOsseco Biosource, Ltd. · 2002
  5. 3 generations backK051576 Avana Dental Implant SystemOsstem Co., Ltd. · 2005
  6. 2 generations backK062051 SS SystemOsstem Implant Co., Ltd. · 2006
  7. 1 generation backK063861 GS SystemOsstem Implant Co., Ltd. · 2007
  8. This deviceK101890 Ball Abutment SystemMegagen Co., Ltd. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K894595Bonefit R Screw ImplantsInstitut Straumann AG1990—
−6K984104Iti Dental Implant SystemStraumann USA19991
−5K993595Nobel Biocare's Modified Surface Implant (Intended for Immediate Loading Upon…Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc.2000—
−4K0118793A Dental Implant SystemOsseco Biosource, Ltd.2002—
−3K051576Avana Dental Implant SystemOsstem Co., Ltd.2005—
−2K062051SS SystemOsstem Implant Co., Ltd.2006—
−1K063861GS SystemOsstem Implant Co., Ltd.2007—
0 (this device)K101890Ball Abutment SystemMegagen Co., Ltd.2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199420
199620
199710
199810
200020
200110
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K101890, 1990–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NHA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NHA device

  1. #1 K222288 DESS Dental Smart Solutionsscore 30.6 · 19 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K063861GS SystemOsstem Implant Co., Ltd.2007—
*K051636Camlog Dental Implant Abutments, Healing Caps, and Accessories
Summary page 3
…1 CFR 872.3630. 12. Substantial Equivalence Comparison Ball Abutment System is substantially equivalent to Osstem Implant Co., Ltd, Altatec GmbH- (K06386I1, K051636). Testing and other comparisons have established that the subject of Ball Abutment System is substantially equivalent in design,…
Altatec GmbH2006—

Also cleared against K063861: 9 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 18 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 9 other devices also cite its predicate K063861.

How does its category compare?

All NHA devices

NHA Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NHA

40in 2025

2007: 382008: 312009: 302010: 192011: 312012: 252013: 222014: 272015: 292016: 382017: 312018: 312019: 282020: 382021: 292022: 332023: 512024: 432025: 402026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2023) · low 19 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NHA

147in 2025

2007: 91 days median2008: 90 days median2009: 95 days median2010: 162 days median2011: 130 days median2012: 171 days median2013: 184 days median2014: 160 days median2015: 151 days median2016: 202 days median2017: 188 days median2018: 200 days median2019: 160 days median2020: 153 days median2021: 211 days median2022: 142 days median2023: 147 days median2024: 158 days median2025: 147 days median2026 (partial year): 169 days median
2007high 211 (2021) · low 90 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NHA

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 22011: 52012: 12013: 12015: 12016: 362017: 22018: 12020: 72023: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 36 (2016) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NHA

838in 2025

2007: 12008: 82009: 302010: 612011: 562012: 52013: 1432014: 1462015: 8582016: 3142017: 5772018: 5912019: 5302020: 4582021: 5462022: 4972023: 6182024: 6352025: 838
2007high 858 (2015) · low 1 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NHA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007389111
2008319028
20093095030
201019162061
201131130556
20122517115
2013221841143
2014271600146
2015291511858
20163820236314
2017311882577
2018312001591
2019281600530
2020381537458
2021292110546
2022331420497
2023511473618
2024431580635
2025401471838
2026231693—

What is it indicated for?

The Ball Abutment Systems are used for implant retained mucosa-supported restorations, such as overdentures where the patient is fully edentulous in the arch to be restored. There are two types of Ball Abutment system, internal and external type, and the ball abutment technique is used on Ball Abutment System implants in the maxilla or mandible.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K101890: Ball Abutment System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K101890

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026