510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Encode Patient Specific Abutment

K102209510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 3, 2010120-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3630Recalls 5

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet 3i, Inc. · NHA Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous

Cleared on Dec 3, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K032263 (Implant Innovations, Inc., 2004) and 1 other predicate after a 120-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1995. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 5 times.

Decided
Dec 3, 2010
Review
120 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NHA
Recalls
5
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K944964 (1995). 36 ancestors in all, the oldest K871863 (1987). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestor1999: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors1994: 7 other ancestors1989: 1 other ancestor1987: 1 other ancestor1995: 4 other ancestors1993: 8 other ancestors1991: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 descendant clearedK944964 · Branemark System Miruscone Abutment System · Nobelpharma USA, Inc. · 1995×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K961728 (1996), K962403 (1996) K971706 · Tiadapt Abutment System · Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 1997K974150 · Procera Preparable Abutment System · Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 1998 · recalledK032263 · 3I Patient-Specific Dental Abutment and Overdenture Bar · Implant Innovations, Inc. · 2004 · recalledK052648 · Modification to 3I Patient-Specific Dental Abutments and Overdenture Bars · Implant Innovations, Inc. · 2005 · recalled1990200020102020
  1. Root · 7 generations backK944964 Branemark System Miruscone Abutment SystemNobelpharma USA, Inc. · 1995
  2. 6 generations backK961728 Miruscone Abutment SystemNobelpharma USA, Inc. · 1996
  3. 5 generations backK962403 Noblepharma Wide AccessoriesNobelpharma USA, Inc. · 1996
  4. 4 generations backK971706 Tiadapt Abutment SystemNobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 1997
  5. 3 generations backK974150 Procera Preparable Abutment SystemNobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
  6. 2 generations backK032263 3I Patient-Specific Dental Abutment and Overdenture BarImplant Innovations, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  7. 1 generation backK052648 Modification to 3I Patient-Specific Dental Abutments and Overdenture…Implant Innovations, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  8. This deviceK102209 Encode Patient Specific AbutmentBiomet 3i, Inc. · 2010
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK123416 Insignia with IteroOrmco Corp. · 2013

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K123416Insignia with IteroOrmco Corp. · 2013 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K944964Branemark System Miruscone Abutment SystemNobelpharma USA, Inc.1995—
−6K961728Miruscone Abutment SystemNobelpharma USA, Inc.1996—
−5K962403Noblepharma Wide AccessoriesNobelpharma USA, Inc.1996—
−4K971706Tiadapt Abutment SystemNobel Biocare Uas, Inc.1997—
−3K974150Procera Preparable Abutment SystemNobel Biocare Uas, Inc.19982
−2K0322633I Patient-Specific Dental Abutment and Overdenture BarImplant Innovations, Inc.20041
−1K052648Modification to 3I Patient-Specific Dental Abutments and Overdenture BarsImplant Innovations, Inc.200513
0 (this device)K102209Encode Patient Specific AbutmentBiomet 3i, Inc.2010—
+1K123416Insignia with IteroOrmco Corp.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
198910
199110
199380
199470
199540
199620
199710
199810
199920
200110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102209, 1995–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NHA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NHA device

  1. #1 K222288 DESS Dental Smart Solutionsscore 30.6 · 19 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K0322633I Patient-Specific Dental Abutment and Overdenture Bar
Summary page 1
…de: 872.3630 BIOMET 3i - Encode® Patient Specific Dental Predicate Device(s): Abutments K032263 & K0S2648 Page,17 of 393 BIOMET 3i Traditional 510(k) Patient Sp…
Implant Innovations, Inc.20041
*K052648Modification to 3I Patient-Specific Dental Abutments and Overdenture Bars
Summary page 2
…y of scanning models to Perfrmace Dta:produce the intended design as cleared in K032263 & K052 648. BIOMET 3i Patient-Specific Dental Abutments…
Implant Innovations, Inc.200513

Also cleared against K032263: 9 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K123416Insignia with IteroOrmco Corp.20130

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 26, 2019Class IIZ-2141-2019Process controlDuring manufacturing, the screw stop ledge was not made to specification and location within the abutment, resulting in the screw head seating deeper in the abutment with no positive stop.
Feb 26, 2019Class IIZ-2142-2019Process controlDuring manufacturing, the screw stop ledge was not made to specification and location within the abutment, resulting in the screw head seating deeper in the abutment with no positive stop.
Feb 26, 2019Class IIZ-2143-2019Process controlDuring manufacturing, the screw stop ledge was not made to specification and location within the abutment, resulting in the screw head seating deeper in the abutment with no positive stop.
Feb 26, 2019Class IIZ-2140-2019Process controlDuring manufacturing, the screw stop ledge was not made to specification and location within the abutment, resulting in the screw head seating deeper in the abutment with no positive stop.
Feb 26, 2019Class IIZ-2144-2019Process controlDuring manufacturing, the screw stop ledge was not made to specification and location within the abutment, resulting in the screw head seating deeper in the abutment with no positive stop.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
  • 6 of the 36 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K123416 (Ormco Corp., 2013) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 9 other devices also cite its predicate K032263.

How does its category compare?

All NHA devices

NHA Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NHA

40in 2025

2007: 382008: 312009: 302010: 192011: 312012: 252013: 222014: 272015: 292016: 382017: 312018: 312019: 282020: 382021: 292022: 332023: 512024: 432025: 402026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2023) · low 19 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NHA

147in 2025

2007: 91 days median2008: 90 days median2009: 95 days median2010: 162 days median2011: 130 days median2012: 171 days median2013: 184 days median2014: 160 days median2015: 151 days median2016: 202 days median2017: 188 days median2018: 200 days median2019: 160 days median2020: 153 days median2021: 211 days median2022: 142 days median2023: 147 days median2024: 158 days median2025: 147 days median2026 (partial year): 169 days median
2007high 211 (2021) · low 90 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NHA

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 22011: 52012: 12013: 12015: 12016: 362017: 22018: 12020: 72023: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 36 (2016) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NHA

838in 2025

2007: 12008: 82009: 302010: 612011: 562012: 52013: 1432014: 1462015: 8582016: 3142017: 5772018: 5912019: 5302020: 4582021: 5462022: 4972023: 6182024: 6352025: 838
2007high 858 (2015) · low 1 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NHA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007389111
2008319028
20093095030
201019162061
201131130556
20122517115
2013221841143
2014271600146
2015291511858
20163820236314
2017311882577
2018312001591
2019281600530
2020381537458
2021292110546
2022331420497
2023511473618
2024431580635
2025401471838
2026231693—

What is it indicated for?

BIOMET 3i Patient Specific Dental Abutments (Encode®) Designed Using Cadent iTero Scanner and inLab Software v3.5 are intended for use as an accessory to endosseous dental implants to support a prosthetic device in a partially or edentulous patient. These are intended for use to support single and multiple tooth prostheses, in the mandible or maxilla. The prostheses can be screw or cement retained to the abutment.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102209: Encode Patient Specific Abutment.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102209

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026