510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

The Buzz Facial Toning System

K102494510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 9, 2011465-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5890

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Daka International, Ltd. · NFO Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes

Cleared on Dec 9, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K011935 (Salton, Inc., 2001) and 5 other predicates after a 465-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1996.

Decided
Dec 9, 2011
Review
465 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NFO
Recalls
None
Predicates
6

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K951951 (1996). 10 ancestors in all, the oldest K870947 (1987). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK951951 Focus Model 795 UnitEmpi · 1996
  2. 3 generations backK041575 Fenzian Treatment SystemEumedic Limited · 2004
  3. 2 generations backK042912 INTERX5000Neuro Resource Group, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK070217 Interx 1000/Derma 200 Stimulator for Cosmetic UseNeuro Resource Group, Inc. · 2008
  5. This deviceK102494 The Buzz Facial Toning SystemDaka International, Ltd. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K951951Focus Model 795 UnitEmpi1996—
−3K041575Fenzian Treatment SystemEumedic Limited2004—
−2K042912INTERX5000Neuro Resource Group, Inc.20051
−1K070217Interx 1000/Derma 200 Stimulator for Cosmetic UseNeuro Resource Group, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K102494The Buzz Facial Toning SystemDaka International, Ltd.2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
200110
200510
200710
200820
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102494, 1996–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NFO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NFO device

  1. #1 K233010 Beagank 4T Plusscore 28.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K011935Rejuvenique Model #RJV10
Summary page 1
…ial Toning System Classification Name: TENS Device for aesthetic use. Classification Code: NFO, Class Il Indications: Indicated for cosmetic use. 3. Predicate Devices K011935 —Salton Inc- Rejuvenique K040871-FaceMaster of Beverly Hills- Facemaster KQ72260-Carol Cole Company- Nuface K070217 —Neuro Resou…
Salton, Inc.2001—
*K040871Facemaster Facial Toning System
Summary page 1
…Name: TENS Device for aesthetic use. Classification Code: NFO, Class Il Indications: Indicated for cosmetic use. 3. Predicate Devices K011935 —Salton Inc- Rejuvenique K040871-FaceMaster of Beverly Hills- Facemaster KQ72260-Carol Cole Company- Nuface K070217 —Neuro Resource Group-Interx 1000 K070250- Is…
Facemaster of Beverly Hills, Inc.2005—
*K072260Nuface, Model NU-4003Carol Cole Company2007—
*K070217Interx 1000/Derma 200 Stimulator for Cosmetic Use
Summary page 1
…: Indicated for cosmetic use. 3. Predicate Devices K011935 —Salton Inc- Rejuvenique K040871-FaceMaster of Beverly Hills- Facemaster KQ72260-Carol Cole Company- Nuface K070217 —Neuro Resource Group-Interx 1000 K070250- Isomers Lab-Nutritone Facial System K071573- Fatrotek SRL- Rugalift Please see attach…
Neuro Resource Group, Inc.2008—
*K070250Nutritone Facial Beauty System
Summary page 1
…e Devices K011935 —Salton Inc- Rejuvenique K040871-FaceMaster of Beverly Hills- Facemaster KQ72260-Carol Cole Company- Nuface K070217 —Neuro Resource Group-Interx 1000 K070250- Isomers Lab-Nutritone Facial System K071573- Fatrotek SRL- Rugalift Please see attached Predicate Chart "0 oTe…
Isomers Laboratories, Inc.2008—
*K071573Rugalift, Model# V.2.1
Summary page 1
…040871-FaceMaster of Beverly Hills- Facemaster KQ72260-Carol Cole Company- Nuface K070217 —Neuro Resource Group-Interx 1000 K070250- Isomers Lab-Nutritone Facial System K071573- Fatrotek SRL- Rugalift Please see attached Predicate Chart "0 oTe A 4. Device Description The Buzz Facial To…
Fatrotek S.R.L.2008—
†K022006Conductive GelThe Dezac Group2002—

Also cleared against K011935: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.7 years on median.
  • 1 of the 10 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K011935.

How does its category compare?

All NFO devices

NFO Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NFO

16in 2025

2007: 12008: 32011: 32012: 32013: 22014: 22015: 22016: 22017: 72018: 52019: 32020: 22021: 72022: 22023: 82024: 52025: 162026 (partial year): 8
2007high 16 (2025) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NFO

124in 2025

2008: 550 days median2011: 394 days median2012: 160 days median2017: 189 days median2018: 177 days median2019: 149 days median2021: 210 days median2023: 128 days median2024: 109 days median2025: 124 days median2026 (partial year): 153 days median
2007high 550 (2008) · low 109 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NFO

2in 2012

2012: 2
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NFO

4in 2025

2011: 12013: 12015: 12016: 52019: 12020: 62021: 62022: 52023: 12024: 42025: 4
2007high 6 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NFO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
2008355000
20090—00
20100—00
2011339401
2012316020
20132—01
20142—00
20152—01
20162—05
2017718900
2018517700
2019314901
20202—06
2021721006
20222—05
2023812801
2024510904
20251612404
202681530—

What is it indicated for?

The Beauty Buzz Facial Toning System is indicated for cosmetic use.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102494: The Buzz Facial Toning System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102494

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026