510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CKMB Udr Assay

K102706510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 19, 2011333-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.1215

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

SENTINEL CH. SpA · JHS Differential Rate Kinetic Method, Cpk Or Isoenzymes

Cleared on Aug 19, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K003158 (Roche Diagnostics Corp., 2000) after a 333-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000.

Decided
Aug 19, 2011
Review
333 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JHS
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K003158 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K003158 · Roche Diagnostics CK-MB · Roche Diagnostics Corp. · 20000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK003158 Roche Diagnostics CK-MBRoche Diagnostics Corp. · 2000
  2. This deviceK102706 CKMB Udr AssaySENTINEL CH. SpA · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K003158Roche Diagnostics CK-MBRoche Diagnostics Corp.2000—
0 (this device)K102706CKMB Udr AssaySENTINEL CH. SpA2011—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102706, 2000–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JHS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K003158Roche Diagnostics CK-MB
Summary page 2
…page 2 of 4 Substantial Equivalence: The CKMB UDR assay is substantially equivalent to Roche CK-MB assay (K003 158). Both assays yield similar Performance Characteristics. Similarities: * Both assays are used for the quantit…
Roche Diagnostics Corp.2000—
†K953239Boehringer Mannheim/Hitachi 917 AnalyzerBoehringer Mannheim Corp.199518

Also cleared against K003158: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K003158.

How does its category compare?

All JHS devices

JHS Differential Rate Kinetic Method, Cpk Or Isoenzymes: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JHS

1in 2016

2008: 12011: 12016: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JHS

Too few JHS 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · JHS

1in 2020

2013: 22018: 52020: 1
2007high 5 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JHS

10in 2025

2008: 52009: 112010: 262011: 182012: 12013: 22014: 32015: 32016: 12017: 12018: 62019: 62020: 132021: 42022: 32023: 122024: 142025: 10
2007high 26 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JHS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20081—05
20090—011
20100—026
20111—018
20120—01
20130—22
20140—03
20150—03
20161—01
20170—01
20180—56
20190—06
20200—113
20210—04
20220—03
20230—012
20240—014
20250—010
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The CKMB UDR assay is an in vitro diagnostic test used for the kinetic quantitative determination on Unicel DxC 600 System of the CK-MB isoenzyme activity of creatine kinase in serum and Li-heparin plasma by inhibition method. The assay is intended for professional use only. Creatine Kinase (CK) catalyses the reversible phosphorylation of creatine by ATP. CK is a dimer composed of two subunits which form three active isoenzymes: BB (CK-1), MB (CK-2), MM…

Read the full statement (118 words)

The CKMB UDR assay is an in vitro diagnostic test used for the kinetic quantitative determination on Unicel DxC 600 System of the CK-MB isoenzyme activity of creatine kinase in serum and Li-heparin plasma by inhibition method. The assay is intended for professional use only. Creatine Kinase (CK) catalyses the reversible phosphorylation of creatine by ATP. CK is a dimer composed of two subunits which form three active isoenzymes: BB (CK-1), MB (CK-2), MM (CK-3). CK-BB isoenzyme only rarely appears in serum. Elevated CK values are due to muscular damages and associated pathologies. CK determination, usually performed with CK2 (also called CK-MB), is used for the diagnosis and follow-up of AMI (acute myocardial infarction) and some muscular diseases.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102706: CKMB Udr Assay.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102706

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026