510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2016

Signature Planner; Signature Guides

K102795510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 2, 2011128-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3560Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Materialise NV · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Feb 2, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K073449 (Materialise NV, 2008) and 1 other predicate after a 128-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1993. 99 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Feb 2, 2011
Review
128 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JWH
Recalls
4
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K924630 (1993). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K924810 (1993). 99 later devices descend from it, 7 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 other ancestor2008: 1 other ancestor1993: 1 other ancestor2019: 7 descendants cleared2015: 4 descendants cleared2012: 4 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 3 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2013: 4 descendants cleared2017: 6 descendants cleared2020: 10 descendants cleared2025: 11 descendants cleared2022: 7 descendants cleared2021: 7 descendants cleared2023: 12 descendants cleared2024: 8 descendants cleared2026: 7 descendants clearedK924630 · Surgicad (TM) View (TM) · Surgicad Corp. · 1993K970617 · CT-Modeller System · Materialise NV · 1997K033849 · Simplant System · Materialise NV · 2004K073449 · Surgicase · Materialise NV · 20081990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 7 descendants2 generations forward: 16 descendants3 generations forward: 16 descendants4 generations forward: 18 descendants5 generations forward: 10 descendants6 generations forward: 11 descendants7 generations forward: 12 descendants8 generations forward: 5 descendants9 generations forward: 3 descendants10 generations forward: 1 descendant K073449 · Surgicase · Materialise NV · 2008K033849 · Simplant System · Materialise NV · 2004K970617 · CT-Modeller System · Materialise NV · 1997K924630 · Surgicad (TM) View (TM) · Surgicad Corp. · 19930+5+10
  1. Root · 4 generations backK924630 Surgicad (TM) View (TM)Surgicad Corp. · 1993
  2. 3 generations backK970617 CT-Modeller SystemMaterialise NV · 1997
  3. 2 generations backK033849 Simplant SystemMaterialise NV · 2004
  4. 1 generation backK073449 SurgicaseMaterialise NV · 2008
  5. This deviceK102795 Signature Planner; Signature GuidesMaterialise NV · 2011
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 71 of its ownK111863 Signature Planner,Signature GuidesMaterialise NV · 2012
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 60 of its ownK121640 Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments SystemMaterialise NV · 2012 · Recalled
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 39 of its ownK131129 Cas Psi ShoulderZimmer Cas · 2013
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 38 of its ownK130126 Signature Personalized Patient Care System - Glenoid Guide SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2013
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 35 of its ownK131559 Match Point System (TM), Surgicase Connect, Match Point System (TM)…Materialise NV · 2013

Showing 5 of 99 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12012: 42013: 42014: 32015: 42016: 52017: 62018: 32019: 72020: 102021: 72022: 72023: 122024: 82025: 112026: 7
2011high 12 (2023) · low 1 (2011)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 99 · See all
  • K111863Signature Planner,Signature GuidesMaterialise NV · 2012 · cites it directly71descendants
  • K121640Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments SystemMaterialise NV · 2012 · cites it directly60descendants
  • K131129Cas Psi ShoulderZimmer Cas · 2013 · 2 generations on39descendants
  • K130126Signature Personalized Patient Care System - Glenoid Guide SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on38descendants
  • K131559Match Point System (TM), Surgicase Connect, Match Point System (TM) GuidesMaterialise NV · 2013 · 2 generations on35descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K924630Surgicad (TM) View (TM)Surgicad Corp.1993—
−3K970617CT-Modeller SystemMaterialise NV1997—
−2K033849Simplant SystemMaterialise NV2004—
−1K073449SurgicaseMaterialise NV2008—
0 (this device)K102795Signature Planner; Signature GuidesMaterialise NV2011—
+1K111863Signature Planner,Signature GuidesMaterialise NV2012—
+1K121640Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments SystemMaterialise NV20121
+2K131129Cas Psi ShoulderZimmer Cas2013—
+2K130126Signature Personalized Patient Care System - Glenoid Guide SystemBiomet, Inc.2013—
+2K131559Match Point System (TM), Surgicase Connect, Match Point System (TM) GuidesMaterialise NV2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
200810
201010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201240
201340
201430
201540
201650
201760
201830
201970
2020100
202170
202270
2023120
202480
2025110
202670
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102795, 1993–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device

  1. #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K073449Surgicase
Summary page 1
…____§ 888.3565), OOG Predicate devices Predicate Device Trade or proprietary or model name SurgiCase 510(k) number K073449 Decision date 04/16/2008 Product code LLZ Manufacturer…
Materialise NV2008—
*K093533Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments System, Version 2.0
Summary page 2
…or proprietary or model name Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments _____________________________ System 2.0 510(k) number K093533 Decision date 02/17/2010 Product code .JWH, MBH Manufacturer…
Materialise NV2010—

Also cleared against K073449: 6 other devices →

What descends from it? (99)

See all 99

7 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111863Signature Planner,Signature GuidesMaterialise NV201271
K121640Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments SystemMaterialise NV201260
K113829Zimmer Patient Specific Instrument System Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments Zimmer…Materialise NV201213
K110415Signature Planner / Signature GuidesMaterialise NV201113
K150928Materialise TKA Guide System, Materialise TKA Planner, Materialise TKA GuidesMaterialise NV201512
K190904Conformis BeneFIT Hip SystemConformis, Inc.20196
K140257Signature Planner, Signature GuidesMaterialise NV20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 3, 2016Class IIZ-1941-2016Process controlA patient specific case of Signature Personalized Patient Care System Knee Guides included a femur guide which does not match the patient associated with the case. If the issue is not identified prior to surgery, the personalized patient…
Sep 23, 2015Class IIZ-0162-2016Use errorPotential inaccuracies in the alignment of the guides. Surgery was inaccurately planned because the patient image data was incorrectly processed.
Feb 4, 2015Class IIZ-1287-2015Employee errorImages belonging to a different patient were used for the production of the patient specific surgical guide. The incorrect guide may cause a delay in surgery to accommodate the preparation and use of traditional instrumentation.
Aug 4, 2011Not classifiedZ-1145-2012Labeling mix-upsBiomet has initiated this action following investigation that identified two (2) specific lots of part number 42-422561 were incorrectly labeled. One (1) unit (lot 025640) was received back from distributor's office as a product complaint.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.0 years on median.
  • None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K111863 (Materialise NV, 2012) has gone furthest, with 71 descendants of its own.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K073449.

How does its category compare?

All JWH devices

JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JWH

20in 2025

2007: 182008: 172009: 112010: 192011: 252012: 332013: 312014: 332015: 272016: 182017: 252018: 252019: 282020: 222021: 242022: 172023: 202024: 192025: 202026 (partial year): 12
2007high 33 (2012) · low 11 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JWH

55in 2025

2007: 74 days median2008: 81 days median2009: 168 days median2010: 85 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 85 days median2013: 128 days median2014: 98 days median2015: 87 days median2016: 88 days median2017: 118 days median2018: 90 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 59 days median2021: 61 days median2022: 56 days median2023: 57 days median2024: 89 days median2025: 55 days median2026 (partial year): 63 days median
2007high 168 (2009) · low 55 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JWH

2in 2025

2007: 142008: 102009: 1092010: 322011: 272012: 852013: 312014: 132015: 112016: 172017: 612018: 142019: 52020: 22021: 82022: 122023: 672024: 72025: 22026 (partial year): 4
2007high 109 (2009) · low 2 (2020)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JWH

9,306in 2025

2007: 1,3052008: 1,4832009: 1,8702010: 3,2862011: 5,1332012: 5,2032013: 6,1352014: 6,7222015: 6,8812016: 7,5862017: 12,2632018: 14,0712019: 14,9872020: 12,5922021: 9,4082022: 8,3642023: 8,9472024: 10,8282025: 9,306
2007high 14,987 (2019) · low 1,305 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071874141,305
20081781101,483
2009111681091,870
20101985323,286
20112587275,133
20123385855,203
201331128316,135
20143398136,722
20152787116,881
20161888177,586
2017251186112,263
201825901414,071
201928133514,987
20202259212,592
2021246189,408
20221756128,364
20232057678,947
20241989710,828
2025205529,306
202612634—

What is it indicated for?

Signature m Personalized Patient Care System is intended to be used as a surgical instrument to assist in the positioning of total knee replacement components intra-operatively and in guiding the marking of bone before cutting provided that anatomic landmarks necessary for alignment and positioning of the implant are identifiable on patient imaging scans. The SignatureTM Personalized Patient Care System can be used with the following Biomet knee systems…

Read the full statement (116 words)

Signature m Personalized Patient Care System is intended to be used as a surgical instrument to assist in the positioning of total knee replacement components intra-operatively and in guiding the marking of bone before cutting provided that anatomic landmarks necessary for alignment and positioning of the implant are identifiable on patient imaging scans.

The SignatureTM Personalized Patient Care System can be used with the following Biomet knee systems and their respective components: Vanguard' Complete Knee System, Vanguard® SSK 360, Vanguard® SSK Revision Knee System, Regenerex® Primary Tibial System, Offset & Microplasty Tibial Systems, Maxim® Complete Knee System, Ascent TM Total Knee System, and AGC® Complete Knee system.

The SignatureTM guides are intended for single use only.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102795: Signature Planner; Signature Guides.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102795

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026