510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Series II X3 Large Diameter Accetabular Inserts

K103124510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 19, 201028-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stryker Corporation · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Nov 19, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K052748 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2000.

Decided
Nov 19, 2010
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K002575 (2000). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2005: 2 other ancestorsK002575 · Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts (4MM) · Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 2000K062419 · Trident Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 20062000200220042006200820102012
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K062419 · Trident Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2006K002575 · Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts (4MM) · Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 20000
  1. Root · 2 generations backK002575 Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts (4MM)Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 2000
  2. 1 generation backK062419 Trident Large Diameter Acetabular InsertsHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2006
  3. This deviceK103124 Series II X3 Large Diameter Accetabular InsertsStryker Corporation · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K002575Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts (4MM)Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.2000—
−1K062419Trident Large Diameter Acetabular InsertsHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2006—
0 (this device)K103124Series II X3 Large Diameter Accetabular InsertsStryker Corporation2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200520
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K103124, 2000–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.3 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052748System 12 X3 Acetabular Inserts; Series II X3 Acetabular Inserts
Summary page 2
…line extension to address modifications made to the Series II X3' Acetabular Inserts. The modifications made to the previously cleared Series II X3® Acetabular Inserts (K052748) are as follows: new larger head sizes, an alternate 4mm lateralization (with 0 and 10 degree hood), and additional 0 degree hood…
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.2005—
*K062419Trident Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts
Summary page 2
…bular Inserts are substantially equivalent to the Series II X3®'Acetabular Inserts cleared under K052748 and Trident® X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts cleared under K062419 in regards to intended use, design, materials, and operational principles as a hip prosthesis. Substantial Equiva…
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.2006—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.0 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

The Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts are single use sterile components, intended for use in conjunction with an associated Howmedica Osteonics metal acetabular shell, femoral bearing, and femoral hip stem as part of a cemented or cementless total hip arthroplasty. The indications for use of total hip replacement prostheses include: 1) Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis…

Read the full statement (124 words)

The Series II X3® Large Diameter Acetabular Inserts are single use sterile components, intended for use in conjunction with an associated Howmedica Osteonics metal acetabular shell, femoral bearing, and femoral hip stem as part of a cemented or cementless total hip arthroplasty.

The indications for use of total hip replacement prostheses include:

1) Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or late stage avascular necrosis.

2) Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure.

3) Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.

4) Where bone stock is of poor quality or inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies of the acetabulum.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K103124: Series II X3 Large Diameter Accetabular Inserts.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K103124

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026