510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ascot Home Medical Monitoring System (HMMS)

K103643510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Oct 6, 2011297-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2910

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ascot Technologies, Inc. · DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency

Cleared on Oct 6, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K043529 (Roche Diagnostics Corp., 2005) and 3 other predicates after a 297-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1987.

Decided
Oct 6, 2011
Review
297 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRG
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K864318 (1987). 28 ancestors in all, the oldest K790130 (1979). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK864318 The Buddy System/Health Information SystemThe Buddy Systems, Inc. · 1987
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK062215 Confidant 2.0Confidant, Inc. · 2006
  4. 2 generations backK072698 Confidant 2.5Confidant, Inc. · 2007
  5. 1 generation backK083331 Confidant, Model 2.6Confidant, Inc. · 2009
  6. This deviceK103643 Ascot Home Medical Monitoring System (HMMS)Ascot Technologies, Inc. · 2011
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK864318 The Buddy System/Health Information SystemThe Buddy Systems, Inc. · 1987
  2. 10 generations backK952979 Hanc NetworkHealthtech Services Corp. · 1996
  3. 9 generations backK964408 Poseidon Cardiac Monitoring System (PCMS)Instromedix, Inc. · 1997
  4. 8 generations backK993169 Modification of: Physiological Signal Transmitter and Receiver…Hewlett-Packard Co. · 1999
  5. 7 generations backK023749 The M3810A Philips Telemonitoring System with M3812B Telestation…Philips Medical Systems · 2002
  6. 6 generations backK031840 Carematix Wellness SystemCarematix, Inc. · 2003
  7. 5 generations backK040966 Modification to Carematix Wellness SystemCarematix, Inc. · 2004
  8. 4 generations backK050929 The Hermes SystemPalaistra Systems, Inc. · 2005
  9. 3 generations backK062215 Confidant 2.0Confidant, Inc. · 2006
  10. 2 generations backK072698 Confidant 2.5Confidant, Inc. · 2007
  11. 1 generation backK083331 Confidant, Model 2.6Confidant, Inc. · 2009
  12. This deviceK103643 Ascot Home Medical Monitoring System (HMMS)Ascot Technologies, Inc. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K864318The Buddy System/Health Information SystemThe Buddy Systems, Inc.1987—
−10K952979Hanc NetworkHealthtech Services Corp.1996—
−9K964408Poseidon Cardiac Monitoring System (PCMS)Instromedix, Inc.1997—
−8K993169Modification of: Physiological Signal Transmitter and Receiver, Model 3810AHewlett-Packard Co.1999—
−7K023749The M3810A Philips Telemonitoring System with M3812B Telestation (M310A/12B)Philips Medical Systems2002—
−6K031840Carematix Wellness SystemCarematix, Inc.2003—
−5K040966Modification to Carematix Wellness SystemCarematix, Inc.2004—
−4K050929The Hermes SystemPalaistra Systems, Inc.2005—
−3K062215Confidant 2.0Confidant, Inc.2006—
−2K072698Confidant 2.5Confidant, Inc.2007—
−1K083331Confidant, Model 2.6Confidant, Inc.2009—
0 (this device)K103643Ascot Home Medical Monitoring System (HMMS)Ascot Technologies, Inc.2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197910
198720
198810
199310
199510
199610
200130
200310
200420
200510
200610
200810
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K103643, 1987–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRG device

  1. #1 K223711 ANNE Onescore 20.8 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K043529Accu-Chek Advisor Insulin Guidance Software
Summary page 1
…and receiver COMPARISON TO PREDICATE DEVICE We claim substantial equivalence to the currently legally cleared ACCU-CHEK@ Advisor Insulin Guidance Software (K043 529) and OneTouch®& ZoomnTM Diabetes Management Program (K0813 18), Confidant 2.6 (K08333 1), and FORA GW 9014 TeleHealth Gatew…
Roche Diagnostics Corp.2005—
*K081318Onetouch Zoom Diabetes Management Program
Summary page 1
…ubstantial equivalence to the currently legally cleared ACCU-CHEK@ Advisor Insulin Guidance Software (K043 529) and OneTouch®& ZoomnTM Diabetes Management Program (K0813 18), Confidant 2.6 (K08333 1), and FORA GW 9014 TeleHealth Gateway Telemedicine System (K 100427).…
Lifescan, Inc.2008—
*K083331Confidant, Model 2.6
Summary page 1
…the currently legally cleared ACCU-CHEK@ Advisor Insulin Guidance Software (K043 529) and OneTouch®& ZoomnTM Diabetes Management Program (K0813 18), Confidant 2.6 (K08333 1), and FORA GW 9014 TeleHealth Gateway Telemedicine System (K 100427).…
Confidant, Inc.2009—
*K100427Fora GW 9014 Telehealth Gateway/TD-9014 Telehealth Gateway
Summary page 1
…ftware (K043 529) and OneTouch®& ZoomnTM Diabetes Management Program (K0813 18), Confidant 2.6 (K08333 1), and FORA GW 9014 TeleHealth Gateway Telemedicine System (K 100427). b70369…
Taidoc Technology Corporation2010—

Also cleared against K043529: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 9 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.1 years on median.
  • 2 of the 28 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K043529.

How does its category compare?

All DRG devices

DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DRG

3in 2025

2007: 62008: 52009: 132010: 102011: 92012: 122013: 132014: 102015: 22016: 22017: 72018: 62019: 52020: 62021: 22022: 62023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2009) · low 2 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRG

127in 2025

2007: 63 days median2008: 74 days median2009: 94 days median2010: 68 days median2011: 104 days median2012: 103 days median2013: 146 days median2014: 177 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 220 days median2019: 122 days median2020: 159 days median2022: 287 days median2023: 212 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 127 days median
2007high 287 (2022) · low 63 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRG

3in 2007

2007: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRG

52in 2025

2007: 142008: 92009: 52010: 132011: 122012: 92013: 132014: 972015: 1312016: 1822017: 4842018: 1662019: 702020: 822021: 1072022: 432023: 192024: 262025: 52
2007high 484 (2017) · low 5 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007663314
200857409
2009139405
20101068013
20119104012
20121210309
201313146013
201410177097
20152—0131
20162—0182
20177980484
201862200166
20195122070
20206159082
20212—0107
20226287043
20234212019
20243125026
20253127052
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

This medical device is indicated for use by patients with known or suspected hypertension or diabetes that a physician wants to monitor blood pressure, pulse, and/or blood glucose at home. This medical device is a software based device which runs on a Windows based Computer or netbook. This medical device receives readings from supported FDA approved devices in the home and serves as a remote communication link between the home and the physician or…

Read the full statement (275 words)

This medical device is indicated for use by patients with known or suspected hypertension or diabetes that a physician wants to monitor blood pressure, pulse, and/or blood glucose at home.

This medical device is a software based device which runs on a Windows based Computer or netbook. This medical device receives readings from supported FDA approved devices in the home and serves as a remote communication link between the home and the physician or qualified medical provider. The physician or qualified medical provider will review the patient information from a web interface and may make medication changes and transmit those changes back to the patient for display on the Home Medical Station(FIMS).

This medical device receives blood pressure, heart rate and blood glucose readings from the supported FDA approved medical devices via USH or serial connection to the HMS. The HMS communicates with the server via standard wireless or wired communication protocols such as cellular data, and wired or wireless internet.

HMMS has been tested to work with Homedics BPA-260-CBL, Omron HEM-790IT and OneTouch Ultra Mini, OneTouch Ultra 2 and OneTouch UltraLink.

This medical device is automation of the exiting process of reporting results to the physician over the phone.

This medical device is not intended to provide real time monitoring. It is not intended for emergency calls or for transmission of any time-critical data. This device is not intended as a substitute for direct medical supervision or emergency intervention.

This medical device does not provide diagnosis of any disease or medical condition and is not a substitute for professional healthcare judgment.

This medical device uses standard communication protocols and encryption to protect patient privacy.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K103643: Ascot Home Medical Monitoring System (HMMS).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K103643

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026