510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Durafiber AG

K103793510(k) TraditionalCleared May 2, 2011126-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug

Cleared on May 2, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K080383 (Convatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, 2008) and 1 other predicate after a 126-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1992. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 2, 2011
Review
126 days
Class
Class U
Product code
FRO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K914604 (1992). 13 ancestors in all, the oldest K890354 (1989). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1998: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestor2016: 1 descendant clearedK914604 · Mepitel Non-Adherent Silicone Dressing · Molnlycke Clinical Products AB · 1992K984371 · Mepitel Non Adherent Silicone Dressing · Molnlycke Health Care, Inc. · 1999K063271 · Aquacel Hydrofiber Dressing and Aquacel AG with Hydrofiber Silver Impregnated Antimicrobial Dressing · Convatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC · 2007K080383 · Aquacel Hydrofiber Wound Dressing and AG Hydrofiber Dressing · Convatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC · 20081990200020102020
  1. Root · 4 generations backK914604 Mepitel Non-Adherent Silicone DressingMolnlycke Clinical Products AB · 1992
  2. 3 generations backK984371 Mepitel Non Adherent Silicone DressingMolnlycke Health Care, Inc. · 1999
  3. 2 generations backK063271 Aquacel Hydrofiber Dressing and Aquacel AG with Hydrofiber Silver…Convatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC · 2007
  4. 1 generation backK080383 Aquacel Hydrofiber Wound Dressing and AG Hydrofiber DressingConvatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC · 2008
  5. This deviceK103793 Durafiber AGSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2011
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK161289 DURAFIBER AgSmith & Nephew Medical Limited · 2016

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K161289DURAFIBER AgSmith & Nephew Medical Limited · 2016 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K914604Mepitel Non-Adherent Silicone DressingMolnlycke Clinical Products AB1992—
−3K984371Mepitel Non Adherent Silicone DressingMolnlycke Health Care, Inc.1999—
−2K063271Aquacel Hydrofiber Dressing and Aquacel AG with Hydrofiber Silver Impregnated…Convatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC2007—
−1K080383Aquacel Hydrofiber Wound Dressing and AG Hydrofiber DressingConvatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC2008—
0 (this device)K103793Durafiber AGSmith & Nephew, Inc.2011—
+1K161289DURAFIBER AgSmith & Nephew Medical Limited2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
199210
199410
199610
199710
199820
200010
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K103793, 1992–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FRO device

  1. #1 K261023 Microdacyn Wound Irrigation Solutionscore 15.5 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K080383Aquacel Hydrofiber Wound Dressing and AG Hydrofiber Dressing
Summary page 2
…not been implemented by the General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel. At this time, however, classification code FRO is unclassified. 6. Predicate Device Aquacel Ag (K080383) The DURAFIBER Ag dressing that is the subject of this submission is substantially equivalent to other legally marketed bum and w…
Convatec, A Division of E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC2008—
*K083113Acticoat Flex 7 Dressing
Summary page 2
…atures and benefits associated with, a fibrous gelling dressing and the added benefit of an antimicrobial dressing. 7. Other Relevant Predicate Device ACTICOAT Flex 7 (K0831 13) The specified silver content of ACTICOAT Flex 7 (K0831 13) is similar to and slightly higher of that of the subject device DURAF…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2009—

Also cleared against K080383: 14 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K161289DURAFIBER AgSmith & Nephew Medical Limited20160

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 19 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.9 years on median.
  • None of the 13 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K161289 (Smith & Nephew Medical Limited, 2016) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 14 other devices also cite its predicate K080383.

How does its category compare?

All FRO devices

FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FRO

11in 2025

2007: 292008: 262009: 312010: 312011: 272012: 242013: 192014: 222015: 282016: 282017: 232018: 202019: 162020: 122021: 82022: 92023: 182024: 242025: 112026 (partial year): 17
2007high 31 (2009) · low 8 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FRO

176in 2025

2007: 187 days median2008: 130 days median2009: 136 days median2010: 146 days median2011: 177 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 194 days median2014: 214 days median2015: 249 days median2016: 222 days median2017: 147 days median2018: 206 days median2019: 270 days median2020: 226 days median2021: 275 days median2022: 332 days median2023: 283 days median2024: 263 days median2025: 176 days median2026 (partial year): 254 days median
2007high 332 (2022) · low 96 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FRO

2in 2024

2007: 42008: 12009: 12011: 42013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 32017: 12019: 12021: 62022: 22023: 2, 2 Class I2024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2021) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FRO

192in 2025

2007: 552008: 302009: 452010: 1222011: 422012: 652013: 1392014: 2692015: 2972016: 1472017: 1492018: 1282019: 1362020: 1392021: 1832022: 1762023: 1982024: 2322025: 192
2007high 297 (2015) · low 30 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200729187455
200826130130
200931136145
2010311460122
201127177442
20122496065
2013191941139
2014222141269
2015282492297
2016282223147
2017231471149
2018202060128
2019162701136
2020122260139
202182756183
202293322176
2023182832 (2)198
2024242632232
2025111760192
2026172542—

What is it indicated for?

DURAFIBER Ag is an effective antimicrobial dressing that is intended to provide a moist wound environment for use in the management of wounds of partial and full thickness wounds including first and second degree burns. Examples of wound types which indicated are:

* Chronic wounds including diabetic ulcers, leg ulcers, pressure ulcers and sores (partial & full thickness);

* surgical wounds left to heal by secondary intent;

* traumatic wounds;

* wounds that are prone to minor bleeding, such as wounds that have been mechanically or surgically debrided.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K103793: Durafiber AG.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K103793

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026