510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class I · 2022Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire Guide
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Cook, Inc. · DQX Wire, Guide, Catheter
Cleared on Feb 2, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K091385 (Cook, Inc., 2009) and 1 other predicate after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992. 2 of the 5 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 10 times, including a Class I recall.
- Decided
- Feb 2, 2011
- Review
- 30 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DQX
- Recalls
- 10 (1 Class I)
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K920891 (1992). 2 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly. 2 of the 5 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.
- Root · 1 generation backK920891 Roadrunner (TM) Wire Guide, ModificationCook, Inc. · 1992
- This deviceK110009 Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire GuideCook, Inc. · 2011
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK130766 Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire GuideCook, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled (Class I)
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK123707 Alight 16 Superselective Microwire GuideCook, Inc. · 2013
Class I recalls in this family
- K130766 Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire Guidecites it directly · 2013
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K920891 | Roadrunner (TM) Wire Guide, Modification | Cook, Inc. | 1992 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K110009 | Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire Guide | Cook, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| +1 | K130766 | Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire Guide | Cook, Inc. | 2013 | Class I |
| +1 | K123707 | Alight 16 Superselective Microwire Guide | Cook, Inc. | 2013 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2 | 1 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DQX device
- #1 K213854 SavvyWirescore 15.7 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K091385 | Approach Hydro ST Wire Guide, Model HMWSummary page 1…utaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. Predicate Devices: The Roadrunner Uni~lide Hydrophilic Wire Guide is identical to the Approach Hydro ST Wire Guide (K091385) in terms of intended use and similar to the Roadrunner Wire Guide (K920891) in terms of materials of construction and technologi… | 2009 |
| * | K920891 | Roadrunner (TM) Wire Guide, ModificationSummary page 1…Roadrunner Uni~lide Hydrophilic Wire Guide is identical to the Approach Hydro ST Wire Guide (K091385) in terms of intended use and similar to the Roadrunner Wire Guide (K920891) in terms of materials of construction and technological characteristics. Device Description: The Roadrunner Unilide Hydrophili… | 1992 |
What descends from it? (2)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1710-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1717-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1715-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1713-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1712-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1711-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1718-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1714-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Class II | Z-1716-2022 | Under Investigation by firm | Product did not meet the acceptance criteria for packaging testing, which included 3-year age acceleration testing, therefore, the sterility of the device may be compromised. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | Class I | Z-2537-2016 | Material/Component Contamination | Potential coating contamination with glass particles. |
The 5 latest of 10 recalls; the web page lists all.
Relatives with a Class I recall
Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.
- K130766Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire GuideCook, Inc. · 2013 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2013 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All DQX devicesDQX Wire, Guide, Catheter: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · DQX
10in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DQX
177in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DQX
3in 2024
Class I (8 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DQX
2,178in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DQX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 14 | 85 | 12 | 760 |
| 2008 | 19 | 87 | 7 | 715 |
| 2009 | 18 | 87 | 49 | 687 |
| 2010 | 21 | 63 | 34 | 987 |
| 2011 | 18 | 43 | 3 | 1,311 |
| 2012 | 20 | 62 | 5 | 1,337 |
| 2013 | 18 | 119 | 7 (4) | 1,474 |
| 2014 | 18 | 103 | 0 | 1,323 |
| 2015 | 15 | 112 | 1 | 1,323 |
| 2016 | 14 | 179 | 2 (2) | 1,466 |
| 2017 | 19 | 85 | 17 | 1,524 |
| 2018 | 19 | 114 | 9 | 1,737 |
| 2019 | 13 | 173 | 2 | 1,679 |
| 2020 | 14 | 106 | 1 (1) | 1,536 |
| 2021 | 6 | 161 | 0 | 1,713 |
| 2022 | 15 | 212 | 0 | 1,647 |
| 2023 | 10 | 136 | 0 | 2,068 |
| 2024 | 11 | 134 | 3 | 2,210 |
| 2025 | 10 | 177 | 0 | 2,178 |
| 2026 | 12 | 145 | 4 (1) | — |
What is it indicated for?
For use in facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K110009 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K110009: Roadrunner Uniglide Hydrophilic Wire Guide.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K110009
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026