510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Abg II Monolithic Hip Stem

K110807510(k) TraditionalCleared May 25, 201163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stryker Corp. · MAY Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous Cemented, Osteophilic Finish

Cleared on May 25, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K092406 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2009) after a 63-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2009. 31 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 25, 2011
Review
63 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAY
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K092406 (2009). 31 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2013: 1 descendant cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2019: 4 descendants cleared2022: 5 descendants cleared2020: 3 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2025: 5 descendants cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared2024: 2 descendants clearedK092406 · Abg II Modular Hip Stem · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2009 · recalled20052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 13 descendants4 generations forward: 12 descendants5 generations forward: 2 descendants K092406 · Abg II Modular Hip Stem · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2009 · recalled0+5
  1. Root · 1 generation backK092406 Abg II Modular Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2009 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK110807 Abg II Monolithic Hip StemStryker Corp. · 2011
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 30 of its ownK123604 Abg Iii Monolithic Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2013 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 21 of its ownK143085 Stryker Orthopaedics Acetabular Shells, Femoral Stems and Total Hip…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 17 of its ownK153345 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics · 2016 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 10 of its ownK171768 Trident® II Acetabular SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. A.K.A. Stryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 8 of its ownK173499 Exeter V40 Femoral Stem Hip System, Orthinox V40 Femoral HeadsStryker Orthopaedics · 2018 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 31 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2013: 12015: 12016: 12017: 22018: 22019: 42020: 32021: 12022: 52023: 32024: 22025: 52026: 1
2013high 5 (2022) · low 0 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 31 · See all
  • K123604Abg Iii Monolithic Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2013 · cites it directly30descendants
  • K143085Stryker Orthopaedics Acetabular Shells, Femoral Stems and Total Hip Instruments for use…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · 2 generations on21descendants
  • K153345Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics · 2016 · 2 generations on17descendants
  • K171768Trident® II Acetabular SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. A.K.A. Stryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · 3 generations on10descendants
  • K173499Exeter V40 Femoral Stem Hip System, Orthinox V40 Femoral HeadsStryker Orthopaedics · 2018 · 3 generations on8descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K092406Abg II Modular Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20091
0 (this device)K110807Abg II Monolithic Hip StemStryker Corp.2011—
+1K123604Abg Iii Monolithic Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20131
+2K143085Stryker Orthopaedics Acetabular Shells, Femoral Stems and Total Hip…Stryker Orthopaedics20152
+2K153345Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics20161
+3K171768Trident® II Acetabular SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. A.K.A. Stryker Orthopaedics201712
+3K173499Exeter V40 Femoral Stem Hip System, Orthinox V40 Femoral HeadsStryker Orthopaedics20182

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
201510
201610
201720
201820
201940
202030
202110
202250
202330
202420
202550
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K110807, 2009–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K092406Abg II Modular Hip Stem
Summary page 1
…, 21 CFR §888.3358 (Product Codes LPH, MBL) Legally Marketed Device to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: ABG TM 11 Modular Hip Stem K092406. Device Description: Howmtedica Osteonics is introducing a monolithic femoral hip prosthesis. The basic design of the ABGTM 11 M…
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.20091

What descends from it? (31)

See all 31

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K123604Abg Iii Monolithic Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.201330

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K123604 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2013) has gone furthest, with 30 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAY devices

MAY Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous Cemented, Osteophilic Finish: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAY

1in 2013

2009: 12011: 12013: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAY

Too few MAY 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MAY

15in 2016

2016: 15
2007high 15 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAY

2in 2025

2010: 42011: 62012: 292013: 452014: 942015: 1152016: 602017: 332018: 332019: 112020: 142021: 242022: 112023: 82024: 82025: 2
2007high 115 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20091—00
20100—04
20111—06
20120—029
20131—045
20140—094
20150—0115
20160—1560
20170—033
20180—033
20190—011
20200—014
20210—024
20220—011
20230—08
20240—08
20250—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The indications for use for total hip arthroplasty include: noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis; rheumatoid arthritis; correction of functional deformity; revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and, nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques. Additional indication…

Read the full statement (138 words)

The indications for use for total hip arthroplasty include:

noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;

rheumatoid arthritis;

correction of functional deformity;

revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,

nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.

Additional indication specific to use of ABGTM II Monolithic Hip Stem with compatible Howmedica Osteonics Constrained Liners:

When the stem is to be used with compatible Howmedica Osteonics Constrained Liners, the device is intended for use in primary or revision patients at high risk of hip dislocation due to a history of prior dislocation, bone loss, soft tissue laxity, neuromuscular disease, or intra-operative instability.

Stryker's ABGTM II Monolithic Hip Stem is intended for cementless use only and is intended for total and hemi-arthroplasty procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K110807: Abg II Monolithic Hip Stem.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K110807

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026