510(k) Report

510(k) · Decided

Recalled · Class II · 2015

Expedium Spine System, Viper System, Viper 2 System

K111136510(k) TraditionalDecided Jun 14, 2012419-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Depuy Spine, Inc. · NKB Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System

Cleared on Jun 14, 2012 after a 419-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 of the 305 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 304 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 14, 2012
Review
419 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NKB
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

304 later devices descend from it, 15 citing it directly. 1 of the 305 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2018: 17 descendants cleared2021: 17 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12013: 5 descendants cleared2016: 7 descendants cleared2014: 10 descendants cleared2019: 17 descendants cleared2017: 10 descendants cleared2024: 48 descendants cleared2015: 12 descendants cleared2023: 40 descendants cleared2025: 40 descendants cleared2026: 34 descendants cleared2020: 20 descendants cleared2022: 27 descendants cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK111136 Expedium Spine System, Viper System, Viper 2 SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2012
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 172 of its ownK124058 Creo Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2013
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 158 of its ownK143633 CREO Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2015
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 139 of its ownK131802 Expedium, Viper. Viper 2 Spine SystemDepuy Spine, A Johnson & Johnson Company · 2013
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 88 of its ownK180210 CREO® Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2018
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 74 of its ownK160904 Expedium Spine System, VIPER and VIPER 2 SystemsMedos International SARL · 2016

Showing 5 of 304 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2013: 52014: 102015: 122016: 72017: 102018: 172019: 172020: 202021: 172022: 272023: 402024: 482025: 402026: 34
2013high 48 (2024) · low 5 (2013)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 304 · See all
  • K124058Creo Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly172descendants
  • K143633CREO Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on158descendants
  • K131802Expedium, Viper. Viper 2 Spine SystemDepuy Spine, A Johnson & Johnson Company · 2013 · cites it directly139descendants
  • K180210CREO® Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2018 · 2 generations on88descendants
  • K160904Expedium Spine System, VIPER and VIPER 2 SystemsMedos International SARL · 2016 · cites it directly74descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K111136Expedium Spine System, Viper System, Viper 2 SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2012—
+1K124058Creo Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2013—
+2K143633CREO Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2015—
+1K131802Expedium, Viper. Viper 2 Spine SystemDepuy Spine, A Johnson & Johnson Company2013—
+2K180210CREO® Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2018—
+1K160904Expedium Spine System, VIPER and VIPER 2 SystemsMedos International SARL2016—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201350
2014100
2015120
201670
2017100
2018170
2019170
2020200
2021171
2022270
2023400
2024480
2025400
2026340
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K111136, 2012–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NKB device

  1. #1 K223494 CD Horizon Spinal Systemscore 40.4 · 30 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (304)

See all 304

15 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K124058Creo Stabilization SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2013172
K131802Expedium, Viper. Viper 2 Spine SystemDepuy Spine, A Johnson & Johnson Company2013139
K160904Expedium Spine System, VIPER and VIPER 2 SystemsMedos International SARL201674
K122877Range Spinal System, Small StatureK2m, Inc.201334
K142185Expedium Verse Spine SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.201420
K181139OLYMPIC Posterior Spinal Fixation SystemAstura Medical, LLC20188
K130877Expedium Spine SystemMedos International SARL20138
K1904714CIS® Chiron Spinal Fixation SystemSolco Biomedical Co., Ltd.20196
K141509Isola and Expedium Growing Spine SystemsMedos Sarl20146
K212489BonOs Inject Bone Cement; NEO Pedicle Screw SystemNeo Medical SA20215

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Apr 21, 2015Class IIZ-1674-2015Process designDevice does not mate as intended.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 4 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K124058 (Globus Medical, Inc., 2013) has gone furthest, with 172 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NKB devices

NKB Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NKB

24in 2025

2007: 382008: 362009: 442010: 372011: 482012: 602013: 352014: 462015: 552016: 502017: 632018: 562019: 392020: 482021: 322022: 342023: 442024: 392025: 242026 (partial year): 30
2007high 63 (2017) · low 24 (2025)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NKB

61in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 59 days median2009: 71 days median2010: 111 days median2011: 84 days median2012: 79 days median2013: 73 days median2014: 90 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 84 days median2017: 69 days median2018: 61 days median2019: 84 days median2020: 68 days median2021: 61 days median2022: 88 days median2023: 72 days median2024: 57 days median2025: 61 days median2026 (partial year): 91 days median
2007high 111 (2010) · low 57 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NKB

1in 2025

2007: 42008: 52009: 332010: 42011: 32012: 132014: 3, 1 Class I2015: 32016: 12017: 12018: 32019: 12020: 12022: 52023: 22024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 33 (2009) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NKB

1,171in 2025

2007: 342008: 822009: 1712010: 4622011: 5772012: 1,7472013: 1,9622014: 1,6712015: 1,4462016: 1,5852017: 1,6182018: 1,6842019: 1,9152020: 2,0762021: 1,7452022: 1,3392023: 9192024: 1,6142025: 1,171
2007high 2,076 (2020) · low 34 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NKB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073887434
20083659582
2009447133171
2010371114462
201148843577
20126079131,747
2013357301,962
201446903 (1)1,671
2015559031,446
2016508411,585
2017636911,618
2018566131,684
2019398411,915
2020486812,076
2021326101,745
2022348851,339
202344722919
2024395731,614
2025246111,171
202630913—

What is it indicated for?

The EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 Spine Systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. The EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 Spine System metallic components are intended for noncervical pedicle fixation and nonpedicle fixation for fusion for the following indications…

Read the full statement (268 words)

The EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 Spine Systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine.

The EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 Spine System metallic components are intended for noncervical pedicle fixation and nonpedicle fixation for fusion for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); spondylolisthesis; trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); tumor, pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion in skeletally mature patients.

When used in a posterior percutaneous approach with MIS instrumentation, the VIPER/VIPER2 System metallic components are intended for noncervical pedicle fixation and nonpedicle fixation for fusion for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); spondylolisthesis; trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); tumor, pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion in skeletally mature patients.

The EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 PEEK rods are only indicated for fusion procedures for spinal stenosis with instability (no greater than Grade T spondylolisthesis) from L1-S! in skeletally mature patients.

When used for posterior non-cervical pedicle screw fixation in pediatric patients, the EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 System metallic implants are indicated as an adjunct to fusion to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The EXPEDIUM and VIPER/VIPER2 systems are intended to be used with autograft and/or allograft. Pediatric pedicle screw fixation is limited to a posterior approach.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K111136: Expedium Spine System, Viper System, Viper 2 System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K111136

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026