510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

Ascom Mobile Monitoring Gateway (MMG)

K111215510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 5, 201164-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2300Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ascom (Sweden) AB · MSX System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors

Cleared on Jul 5, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K103634 (Ascom (Us), Inc., 2011) after a 64-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1997. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jul 5, 2011
Review
64 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MSX
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K962827 (1997). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K945277 (1995). 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK962827 Alarm Display Unit/Pager-Lan System (Adu)Marquette Electronics, Inc. · 1997
  2. 5 generations backK971868 Impact (Informing Mobile Personnel and Care Tracking) Pager SystemMarquette Electronics, Inc. · 1997
  3. 4 generations backK973527 Cardio-Pager SystemData Critical Corp. · 1998
  4. 3 generations backK992749 Ultraview Waveform Pager System, Model 91841Spacelabs Medical, Inc. · 2000
  5. 2 generations backK062278 Spacelabs Medical Clinical Event Interface, Model 91847Spacelabs Medical, Inc. · 2006
  6. 1 generation backK103634 Ascom Clinicalconnex CardiomaxAscom (Us), Inc. · 2011
  7. This deviceK111215 Ascom Mobile Monitoring Gateway (MMG)Ascom (Sweden) AB · 2011
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK193421 Smart Alarm InterfaceBoxview, LLC · 2020
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK243270 TigerConnect Alarm ManagementTigerconnect · 2025
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK212622 Zyter RPMZyter, Inc. · 2022

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K193421Smart Alarm InterfaceBoxview, LLC · 2020 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K243270TigerConnect Alarm ManagementTigerconnect · 2025 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K212622Zyter RPMZyter, Inc. · 2022 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K962827Alarm Display Unit/Pager-Lan System (Adu)Marquette Electronics, Inc.1997—
−5K971868Impact (Informing Mobile Personnel and Care Tracking) Pager SystemMarquette Electronics, Inc.1997—
−4K973527Cardio-Pager SystemData Critical Corp.1998—
−3K992749Ultraview Waveform Pager System, Model 91841Spacelabs Medical, Inc.2000—
−2K062278Spacelabs Medical Clinical Event Interface, Model 91847Spacelabs Medical, Inc.2006—
−1K103634Ascom Clinicalconnex CardiomaxAscom (Us), Inc.2011—
0 (this device)K111215Ascom Mobile Monitoring Gateway (MMG)Ascom (Sweden) AB2011—
+1K193421Smart Alarm InterfaceBoxview, LLC2020—
+2K243270TigerConnect Alarm ManagementTigerconnect2025—
+2K212622Zyter RPMZyter, Inc.2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202010
202210
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K111215, 1997–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MSX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MSX device

  1. #1 K242750 Central Stationscore 21.5 · 31 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K103634Ascom Clinicalconnex Cardiomax
Summary page 1
…odel Predicate 510(k) PredicateManufacturer Equivalent Devices: Number and Model Ascom Mobile K103634 Ascomn Cardiomax Monitoring Gateway (MMG)…
Ascom (Us), Inc.2011—

Also cleared against K103634: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K193421Smart Alarm InterfaceBoxview, LLC20202

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 10, 2015Class IIZ-1638-2016Software designDue to a malfunction of software, the secondary module will not automatically take over messaging if the primary module fails after a software upgrade to one of the other affected versions. Messages from GE Carescape/Nurse Call will not…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K193421 (Boxview, LLC, 2020) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K103634.

How does its category compare?

All MSX devices

MSX System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MSX

4in 2025

2007: 42008: 12009: 12010: 32011: 72012: 42013: 22014: 32015: 52016: 32017: 22018: 42019: 42020: 52021: 32022: 52023: 32024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 5
2007high 7 (2011) · low 1 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MSX

295in 2025

2007: 58 days median2010: 43 days median2011: 72 days median2012: 145 days median2014: 165 days median2015: 138 days median2016: 174 days median2018: 111 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 193 days median2021: 227 days median2022: 177 days median2023: 244 days median2024: 212 days median2025: 295 days median2026 (partial year): 145 days median
2007high 295 (2025) · low 43 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MSX

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 22010: 12011: 12012: 22015: 22017: 22018: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MSX

19in 2025

2007: 52008: 62009: 72010: 142011: 32012: 42013: 172014: 322015: 312016: 112017: 162018: 152019: 152020: 252021: 172022: 182023: 102024: 322025: 19
2007high 32 (2014) · low 3 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MSX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200745815
20081—16
20091—27
2010343114
201177213
2012414524
20132—017
20143165032
20155138231
20163174011
20172—216
20184111115
2019492015
20205193025
20213227017
20225177118
20233244010
20244212032
20254295119
202651452—

What is it indicated for?

The Ascom Mobile Monitoring Gateway (MMG) is intended to interface with the GE Healthcare patient monitoring network and the Ascom Messaging System, in order to provide a secondary means of automated visual and/or audible annunciating and displaying of patient alarm information to healthcare professionals, via display devices. The MMG does not alter the behaviour of the monitoring system. Neither is it intended to replace or alter the primary alarm…

Read the full statement (143 words)

The Ascom Mobile Monitoring Gateway (MMG) is intended to interface with the GE Healthcare patient monitoring network and the Ascom Messaging System, in order to provide a secondary means of automated visual and/or audible annunciating and displaying of patient alarm information to healthcare professionals, via display devices.

The MMG does not alter the behaviour of the monitoring system. Neither is it intended to replace or alter the primary alarm function on the patient monitor. The MMG is not intended to be used for diagnostic purposes.

The MMG is intended for use by professional clinical personnel and relies on proper use and operation of both the communication infrastructure in place at the healthcare facility and the display devices used.

The MMG software is installed on specified hardware located in a computer hall or similar, where the MMG can't come into physical contact with patients.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K111215: Ascom Mobile Monitoring Gateway (MMG).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K111215

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026