510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (Picc)

K111244510(k) SpecialCleared Jun 14, 201142-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5970

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cook, Inc. · LJS Catheter, Intravascular, Therapeutic, Long-Term Greater Than 30 Days

Cleared on Jun 14, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K072625 (Cook, Inc., 2007) and 1 other predicate after a 42-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1986. 2 of the 13 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jun 14, 2011
Review
42 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LJS
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K862056 (1986). 11 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly. 2 of the 13 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors2000: 2 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall11996: 1 other ancestor2014: 1 descendant clearedK862056 · [Central Venous][Multi-Lumen] Catheter W/Flex Tip · Arrow Intl., Inc. · 1986 · Class I recallK992198 · Urethane Picc Line Model Upics- · Cook, Inc. · 1999K021557 · Spectrum Silicone Catheter · Cook, Inc. · 2003K081690 · Spectrum Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter · Cook, Inc. · 2008K100974 · Spectrum Turbo-Ject Picc Set · Cook Incorporated · 20101990200020102020
  1. Root · 5 generations backK862056 [Central Venous][Multi-Lumen] Catheter W/Flex TipArrow Intl., Inc. · 1986 · Recalled (Class I)
  2. 4 generations backK992198 Urethane Picc Line Model Upics-Cook, Inc. · 1999
  3. 3 generations backK021557 Spectrum Silicone CatheterCook, Inc. · 2003
  4. 2 generations backK081690 Spectrum Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous CatheterCook, Inc. · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK100974 Spectrum Turbo-Ject Picc SetCook Incorporated · 2010
  6. This deviceK111244 Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (Picc)Cook, Inc. · 2011
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK141818 Turbo-Ject Picc SetsCook Corporated · 2014

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K141818Turbo-Ject Picc SetsCook Corporated · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K862056[Central Venous][Multi-Lumen] Catheter W/Flex TipArrow Intl., Inc.1986Class I
−4K992198Urethane Picc Line Model Upics-Cook, Inc.1999—
−3K021557Spectrum Silicone CatheterCook, Inc.2003—
−2K081690Spectrum Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous CatheterCook, Inc.2008—
−1K100974Spectrum Turbo-Ject Picc SetCook Incorporated2010—
0 (this device)K111244Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (Picc)Cook, Inc.2011—
+1K141818Turbo-Ject Picc SetsCook Corporated2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
200021
200120
200710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K111244, 1986–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LJS device

  1. #1 K241910 Neonav ECG Tip Location Systemscore 18.0 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K072625Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (Picc)
Summary page 2
…2011 Predicate Devices: Turbo-Ject® Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (P1CC), 5 10(k) number K072625 Spectrum®o Turbo-Ject® Peripherally Inserted Central…
Cook, Inc.20079
*K100974Spectrum Turbo-Ject Picc Set
Summary page 2
…Spectrum®o Turbo-Ject® Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (P1CC), 5 10(k) number K 100974 Device Description: The Turbo-Ject® P1CC catheters are radiopaque polyurethane peripherally inserted central venous catheters f…
Cook Incorporated2010—

Also cleared against K072625: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K141818Turbo-Ject Picc SetsCook Corporated20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K993691Arrowg +Ard Blue Plus Antimicrobial Multi-Lumen Central Venous CatheterArrow Intl., Inc. · 2000 · 4 generations back · ◆ in the 2000 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K862056[Central Venous][Multi-Lumen] Catheter W/Flex TipArrow Intl., Inc. · 1986 · 5 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.8 years on median.
  • 5 of the 11 ancestors have a recall of any class; 2 have a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K141818 (Cook Corporated, 2014) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K072625.

How does its category compare?

All LJS devices

LJS Catheter, Intravascular, Therapeutic, Long-Term Greater Than 30 Days: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LJS

8in 2025

2007: 142008: 42009: 162010: 92011: 62012: 142013: 142014: 82015: 72016: 92017: 72018: 102020: 22021: 32022: 32023: 42024: 12025: 82026 (partial year): 2
2007high 16 (2009) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LJS

171in 2025

2007: 92 days median2008: 97 days median2009: 70 days median2010: 114 days median2011: 55 days median2012: 77 days median2013: 31 days median2014: 47 days median2015: 71 days median2016: 128 days median2017: 101 days median2018: 148 days median2021: 284 days median2022: 177 days median2023: 47 days median2025: 171 days median
2007high 284 (2021) · low 31 (2013)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LJS

5in 2023

2008: 12009: 12010: 122011: 42012: 402014: 152015: 22016: 182017: 92018: 32021: 12023: 5, 2 Class I2026 (partial year): 8, 1 Class I
2007high 40 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (3 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LJS

4,372in 2025

2007: 3922008: 3692009: 3792010: 4952011: 6962012: 5642013: 6802014: 8422015: 1,3062016: 1,1232017: 2,1002018: 2,3242019: 2,0522020: 2,5392021: 3,0842022: 3,2562023: 2,7992024: 4,2432025: 4,372
2007high 4,372 (2025) · low 369 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LJS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714920392
20084971369
200916701379
2010911412495
20116554696
2012147740564
201314310680
201484715842
201577121,306
20169128181,123
2017710192,100
20181014832,324
20190—02,052
20202—02,539
2021328413,084
2022317703,256
20234475 (2)2,799
20241—04,243
2025817104,372
20262—8 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The Turbo-Ject® P1CC is indicated for short- or long-term use for venous pressure monitoring, blood sampling, administration of drugs and fluids, and for use with power injectors for delivery of contrast in CT studies. The Turbo-Ject® P1CC is indicated for multiple injections of contrast media through a power injector. The maximum pressure limit setting for power injectors used with the Turbo-Ject® P1CC may not exceed 325 psi and the flow rate may not…

Read the full statement (214 words)

The Turbo-Ject® P1CC is indicated for short- or long-term use for venous pressure monitoring, blood sampling, administration of drugs and fluids, and for use with power injectors for delivery of contrast in CT studies. The Turbo-Ject® P1CC is indicated for multiple injections of contrast media through a power injector. The maximum pressure limit setting for power injectors used with the Turbo-Ject® P1CC may not exceed 325 psi and the flow rate may not exceed the maximum flow rate indicated.

Catheter Size | Maximum Flow Rate* | Injection Pressure Limit Setting

3.0 Fr Single Lumen | 2 mL/sec | 325 psi

4.0 Fr Single Lumen | 4 mL/sec | 325 psi

4.0 Fr Double Lumen | 3 mL/sec | 325 psi

5.0 Fr Single Lumen | 7 mL/sec | 325 psi

5.0 Fr Double Lumen | 5 mL/sec | 325 psi

6.0 Fr Triple Lumen** | 7 mL/sec | 325 psi

*Flow rates achieved using room temperature Omnipaque 300® contrast and verified using a Medrad Stellant® CT injector system. Omnipaque 300 has a viscosity of 11.8 centipoise at room temperature (20 degrees C). A change in temperature or viscosity of the contrast medium used will result in a change in achievable flow rates.

**Lumen #1 only.

Omnipaque 300® is a registered trademark of GE Healthcare.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K111244: Turbo-Ject Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (Picc).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K111244

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026