510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Xtag Respiratory Viral Panel, Xtag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-1)

K112199510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 1, 201131-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.3980Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. · OCC Respiratory Virus Panel Nucleic Acid Assay System

Cleared on Sep 1, 2011 after a 31-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Sep 1, 2011
Review
31 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OCC
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK112199 Xtag Respiratory Viral Panel, Xtag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-1)Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. · 2011
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK112781 Tag Respiratory Viral Panel Tag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-I)Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. · 2012 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K112781Tag Respiratory Viral Panel Tag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-I)Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K112199Xtag Respiratory Viral Panel, Xtag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-1)Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.2011—
+1K112781Tag Respiratory Viral Panel Tag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-I)Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.20121

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K112199, 2011–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OCC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OCC device

  1. #1 K262747 ID NOW Influenza A & B 2; ID NOW RSV; ID NOW…score 15.2 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K112781Tag Respiratory Viral Panel Tag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-I)Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 16, 2019Class IIZ-0161-2020Device DesignThe Assay may give a false negative result when detecting and subtyping Influenza A (H3) and detecting RSV A in patient specimens. However, the assay will continue to detect Influenza A, Influenza B, RSV B and all other targets in…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K112781 (Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All OCC devices

OCC Respiratory Virus Panel Nucleic Acid Assay System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OCC

1in 2024

2008: 42009: 62010: 22011: 92012: 62013: 62014: 42015: 82016: 72017: 102018: 42019: 52020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 22024: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 10 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OCC

31in 2019

2008: 28 days median2009: 24 days median2011: 82 days median2012: 125 days median2013: 79 days median2014: 94 days median2015: 85 days median2016: 92 days median2017: 136 days median2018: 134 days median2019: 31 days median2026 (partial year): 130 days median
2007high 136 (2017) · low 24 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OCC

1in 2024

2014: 12018: 12019: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OCC

2in 2025

2011: 22012: 12014: 522015: 12016: 362017: 12018: 12019: 22020: 172021: 6862022: 22023: 12024: 32025: 2
2007high 686 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OCC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200842800
200962400
20102—00
201198202
2012612501
201367900
2014494152
201588501
2016792036
20171013601
2018413411
201953112
20202—017
20211—0686
20221—02
20232—01
20241—13
20250—02
202631300—

What is it indicated for?

The xTAG* Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) is a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex test intended for the simultaneous detection and identification of multiple respiratory virus nucleic acids in nasopharyngeal swabs from individuals suspected of respiratory tract infections. The following virus types and subtypes are identified using RVP: Influenza A, Influenza A subtype Hi, Influenza A subtype H3, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype A…

Read the full statement (383 words)

The xTAG* Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) is a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex test intended for the simultaneous detection and identification of multiple respiratory virus nucleic acids in nasopharyngeal swabs from individuals suspected of respiratory tract infections. The following virus types and subtypes are identified using RVP: Influenza A, Influenza A subtype Hi, Influenza A subtype H3, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype B, Parainfluenza 1, Parainfluenza 2, and Parainfluenza 3 virus, Human Metapneumovirus, Rhinovirus, and Adenovirus. The detection and identification of specific viral nucleic acids from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory infection aids in the diagnosis of respiratory viral infection if used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. It is recommended that specimens found to be negative for Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype A and B, Parainfluenza 1, Parainfluenza 2, Parainfluenza 3 and Adenovirus, after examination using RVP be confirmed by cell culture. Negative results do not preclude respiratory virus infection and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment or other management decisions.

Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection, or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. The use of additional laboratory testing (e.g. bacterial culture, immunofluorescence, radiography) and clinical presentation must be taken into consideration in order to obtain the final diagnosis of respiratory viral infection.

Due to seasonal prevalence, performance characteristics for Influenza A/Hi were established primarily with retrospective specimens.

The RVP assay cannot adequately detect Adenovirus species C,or serotypes 7a and 41. The RVP primers for detection of rhinovirus cross-react with enterovirus. A rhinovirus reactive result should be confirmed by an alternate method (e.g. cell culture).

Performance characteristics for Influenza A Virus were established when Influenza A/H3 and A/Hi were the predominant Influenza A viruses in circulation. When other Influenza A viruses are emerging, performance characteristics may vary. If infections with a novel Influenza Avirus is suspected based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent Influenza viruses and sent to a state or local health department for testing. Viral culture should not be attempted in these cases unless a BSL 3+ facility is available to receive and culture specimens.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K112199: Xtag Respiratory Viral Panel, Xtag Data Analysis Software (Tdas RVP-1).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K112199

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026