510(k) · Cleared
ClearedAP 72OS Semi-Automated Instrument
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, Inc. · DHB System, Test, Radioallergosorbent (Rast) Immunological
Cleared on Dec 20, 2012 after a 444-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
- Decided
- Dec 20, 2012
- Review
- 444 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DHB
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DHB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DHB device
- #1 K260331 IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy Specific IgE Vantage…score 12.3 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All DHB devicesDHB System, Test, Radioallergosorbent (Rast) Immunological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · DHB
2in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DHB
90in 2019
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DHB
14in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DHB
6in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DHB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 7 | 118 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3 | 247 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5 | 405 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 3 | 260 | 1 | 2 |
| 2013 | 5 | 257 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 1 | 11 |
| 2018 | 2 | — | 1 | 6 |
| 2019 | 3 | 90 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2022 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 10 |
| 2025 | 2 | — | 14 | 6 |
| 2026 | 6 | 138 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The AP 72OSTM Semi-Automated Instrument is a semi-automated processor for use with the OPTIGENO Assay.
The OPTIGEN® Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for use in the semi-quantitative determination of circulating allergen-specific IgE concentrations in human serum. It is intended to aid in the clinical diagnosis of IgE mediated allergic disorders in conjunction with other clinical findings. The device is designed for use in clinical laboratories.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.
https://510kreport.com/device/K112910 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K112910: AP 72OS Semi-Automated Instrument.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K112910
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026