510(k) · Cleared
ClearedProfemur XM Wingless Distal Centralizer, Perfecta Distal Centralizer
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · KWA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained (Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component)
Cleared on Nov 10, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K052915 (Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc, 2006) and 1 other predicate after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991.
- Decided
- Nov 10, 2011
- Review
- 30 days
- Class
- Class III
- Product code
- KWA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K911052 (1991). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK911052 Nexus (TM) Femoral Hip StemDow Corning Wright · 1991
- This deviceK113019 Profemur XM Wingless Distal Centralizer, Perfecta Distal CentralizerWrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K911052 | Nexus (TM) Femoral Hip Stem | Dow Corning Wright | 1991 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K113019 | Profemur XM Wingless Distal Centralizer, Perfecta Distal Centralizer | Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc | 2011 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KWA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K052915 | Profemur XTR Hip StemSummary page 1…ROFEMURO XM (PROFEMVUR XTR) NEXUS M Femoral Hip Stem 510(k): K052915, K911052 Predicate Classification and Number: Orthopedics/87/ KWA, 888.3330 DEVICE INFORMATION A. Device Descr… | 2006 |
| * | K911052 | Nexus (TM) Femoral Hip StemSummary page 1…XM (PROFEMVUR XTR) NEXUS M Femoral Hip Stem 510(k): K052915, K911052 Predicate Classification and Number: Orthopedics/87/ KWA, 888.3330 DEVICE INFORMATION A. Device Descr iption… | 1991 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
- 3 other devices also cite its predicate K052915.
How does its category compare?
All KWA devicesKWA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained (Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · KWA
4in 2012
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KWA
76in 2012
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KWA
19in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · KWA
1,216in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code KWA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 8 | 74 | 0 | 213 |
| 2008 | 9 | 57 | 13 | 762 |
| 2009 | 7 | 139 | 0 | 820 |
| 2010 | 6 | 167 | 84 | 3,348 |
| 2011 | 11 | 101 | 28 | 17,737 |
| 2012 | 4 | 76 | 21 | 24,601 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 1 | 20,020 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 16,494 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 12,339 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 1 | 7,872 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 1 | 6,847 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 1 | 6,388 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 2 | 7,628 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 1 | 4,538 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 2,064 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,617 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 19 | 1,474 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,168 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,216 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The PMMA Distal Centralizers are intended for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:
1. non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia;
2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis;
3. correction of functional deformity; and,
4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed
The PMMA Distal Centralizers are single use components, intended for use as part of a cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K113019 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K113019: Profemur XM Wingless Distal Centralizer, Perfecta Distal Centralizer.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K113019
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026