510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BIOPMEDICS52,52 1DAY,52 Toric,52 1DAY Toric

K113267510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 2, 201128-day reviewClass II21 CFR 886.5925

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

CooperVision, Inc. · LPL Lenses, Soft Contact, Daily Wear

Cleared on Dec 2, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K003136 (Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc., 2001) and 1 other predicate after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2001.

Decided
Dec 2, 2011
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPL
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K003136 (2001). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK003136 Ocular Sciences, Inc. Biomedics 52 (Ocufilcon D) UV Blocking Daily…Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc. · 2001
  2. 1 generation backK020389 Biomedics 52 (Ocufilcon B) UV Blocking Daily Wear Soft Contact LensOcular Sciences · 2002
  3. This deviceK113267 BIOPMEDICS52,52 1DAY,52 Toric,52 1DAY ToricCooperVision, Inc. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K003136Ocular Sciences, Inc. Biomedics 52 (Ocufilcon D) UV Blocking Daily Wear Soft…Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc.2001—
−1K020389Biomedics 52 (Ocufilcon B) UV Blocking Daily Wear Soft Contact LensOcular Sciences2002—
0 (this device)K113267BIOPMEDICS52,52 1DAY,52 Toric,52 1DAY ToricCooperVision, Inc.2011—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K113267, 2001–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPL device

  1. #1 K243868 Pegavision (Toufilcon B) Daily Disposable Soft…score 16.8 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K003136Ocular Sciences, Inc. Biomedics 52 (Ocufilcon D) UV Blocking Daily Wear Soft Contact Lens
Summary page 3
…ion to the cornea and into the eye. 7. Predicate Device(s) * Biomedics 52 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) UV Blocker Daily Wear Contact Lens (K003136) January 16, 2001 * Biomedics 52 I-Day (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydroph ilic) UV Blocking Contact Lens for Daily Wear (K02…
Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc.2001—
*K020389Biomedics 52 (Ocufilcon B) UV Blocking Daily Wear Soft Contact Lens
Summary page 3
…ker Daily Wear Contact Lens (K003136) January 16, 2001 * Biomedics 52 I-Day (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydroph ilic) UV Blocking Contact Lens for Daily Wear (K0203 89) June 4, 2002 8. Characteristics of Substantial Equivalence The soft contact lenses have the following similarities to the pre…
Ocular Sciences2002—

Also cleared against K003136: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9.5 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K003136.

How does its category compare?

All LPL devices

LPL Lenses, Soft Contact, Daily Wear: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPL

12in 2025

2007: 32008: 102009: 62010: 92011: 122012: 122013: 172014: 152015: 122016: 212017: 92018: 212019: 112020: 102021: 82022: 92023: 102024: 122025: 122026 (partial year): 10
2007high 21 (2016) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPL

202in 2025

2007: 281 days median2008: 104 days median2009: 260 days median2010: 244 days median2011: 170 days median2012: 131 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 102 days median2015: 120 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 115 days median2020: 158 days median2021: 88 days median2022: 212 days median2023: 167 days median2024: 128 days median2025: 202 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 281 (2007) · low 56 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPL

1in 2025

2007: 12009: 12011: 52012: 12014: 12015: 12017: 112020: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2017) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPL

216in 2025

2007: 2802008: 2142009: 1372010: 2222011: 3772012: 2502013: 1512014: 1792015: 1612016: 1932017: 2802018: 2572019: 2052020: 1172021: 1102022: 1262023: 1782024: 2972025: 216
2007high 377 (2011) · low 110 (2021)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200732811280
2008101040214
200962601137
201092440222
2011121705377
2012121311250
2013171350151
2014151021179
2015121201161
2016211120193
201799811280
201821560257
2019111150205
2020101581117
20218880110
202292121126
2023101670178
2024121280297
2025122021216
202610901—

What is it indicated for?

SPHERICAL Biomedics 52 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) UV Blocking Contact lenses are indicated for the correction of visual acuity in persons with non-diseased eyes that are myopic (nearsighted) or hyperopic (farsighted) and may exhibit refractive astigmatism of 2.00 diopters that does not interfere with visual acuity. TORIC Biomedics 52 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) UV Blocking Contact lenses are indicated for the correction of visual acuity in…

Read the full statement (179 words)

SPHERICAL

Biomedics 52 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) UV Blocking Contact lenses are indicated for the correction of visual acuity in persons with non-diseased eyes that are myopic (nearsighted) or hyperopic (farsighted) and may exhibit refractive astigmatism of 2.00 diopters that does not interfere with visual acuity.

TORIC

Biomedics 52 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) UV Blocking Contact lenses are indicated for the correction of visual acuity in persons with non-diseased eyes that are myopic (nearsighted) or hyperopic (farsighted) and may exhibit refractive astigmatism of 10.00 diopters.

The lens may be prescribed for Daily Wear in not-aphakic persons. The eyecare practitioner may prescribe the contact lens for either single-use disposable wear or for frequent replacement wear, with cleaning, disinfection, and scheduled replacement. When prescribed for single-use disposable wear the lens is to be discarded after each removal. When prescribed for frequent replacement wear, the contact lens may be disinfected using a chemical (not heat) disinfecting system.

The Biomedics (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) UV Blocking Contact Lenses help protect against transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K113267: BIOPMEDICS52,52 1DAY,52 Toric,52 1DAY Toric.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K113267

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026