510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Alexis O Wound Protector/Retractor

K113268510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 8, 2013462-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4370

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Applied Medical Resources Corp. · KGW Ring (Wound Protector), Drape Retention, Internal

Cleared on Feb 8, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K031889 (Applied Medical Resources Corp., 2003) after a 462-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996.

Decided
Feb 8, 2013
Review
462 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KGW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K954824 (1996). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK954824 Protector Retractor & Protector Retractor with DrapeMedical Creative Technologies, Inc. · 1996
  2. 1 generation backK031889 Alexis Wound RetractorApplied Medical Resources Corp. · 2003
  3. This deviceK113268 Alexis O Wound Protector/RetractorApplied Medical Resources Corp. · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K954824Protector Retractor & Protector Retractor with DrapeMedical Creative Technologies, Inc.1996—
−1K031889Alexis Wound RetractorApplied Medical Resources Corp.2003—
0 (this device)K113268Alexis O Wound Protector/RetractorApplied Medical Resources Corp.2013—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K113268, 1996–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KGW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KGW device

  1. #1 K253531 Alexis® Lighted Wound Protector-Retractor…score 13.9 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K031889Alexis Wound Retractor
Summary page 1
…Product Code KKX PREDICATE DEVICE: Applied Medical Alexis Wound Retractor (K03 1889) DEVICE DESCRIPTION: Applied Medical's Alexis 0 wound protector/retractors are disposable single-use surgical devices used to es…
Applied Medical Resources Corp.2003—

Also cleared against K031889: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9.4 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K031889.

How does its category compare?

All KGW devices

KGW Ring (Wound Protector), Drape Retention, Internal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KGW

2so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12009: 12010: 12013: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2026) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KGW

Too few KGW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · KGW

No recall names KGW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KGW

15in 2025

2011: 12016: 122017: 582018: 132019: 112020: 122021: 42022: 182023: 132024: 192025: 15
2007high 58 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KGW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20091—00
20101—00
20110—01
20120—00
20131—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—012
20170—058
20180—013
20190—011
20200—012
20210—04
20220—018
20230—013
20240—019
20250—015
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Applied Wound Protector/Retractor is indicated for use to:

* Access the abdominal cavity during surgery through an atraumnatically retracted incision.

* Deliver maximum exposure of the abdominal cavity with minimum incision size.

* Protect against wound contamination during laparoscopic and open surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K113268: Alexis O Wound Protector/Retractor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K113268

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026