510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

HLS Uni Evolution & U-Kneetec

K120262510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 25, 2012180-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3520

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Tornier, Inc. · HSX Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Jul 25, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K022211 (Tornier, 2003) and 2 other predicates after a 180-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1988.

Decided
Jul 25, 2012
Review
180 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HSX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K881779 (1988). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K880155 (1988). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestor1988: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestorK881779 · Whiteside Ortholoc II Unicondylar Knee System · Dow Corning Wright · 1988K014171 · Advance Unicondylar Knee System · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2002K022211 · HLS Uni Evolution Prosthesis · Tornier · 2003198519901995200020052010
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 2 other ancestors3 generations back: 1 other ancestor K022211 · HLS Uni Evolution Prosthesis · Tornier · 2003K014171 · Advance Unicondylar Knee System · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2002K881779 · Whiteside Ortholoc II Unicondylar Knee System · Dow Corning Wright · 19880
  1. Root · 3 generations backK881779 Whiteside Ortholoc II Unicondylar Knee SystemDow Corning Wright · 1988
  2. 2 generations backK014171 Advance Unicondylar Knee SystemWrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2002
  3. 1 generation backK022211 HLS Uni Evolution ProsthesisTornier · 2003
  4. This deviceK120262 HLS Uni Evolution & U-KneetecTornier, Inc. · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K881779Whiteside Ortholoc II Unicondylar Knee SystemDow Corning Wright1988—
−2K014171Advance Unicondylar Knee SystemWrightmedicaltechnologyinc2002—
−1K022211HLS Uni Evolution ProsthesisTornier2003—
0 (this device)K120262HLS Uni Evolution & U-KneetecTornier, Inc.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198810
199510
199610
200120
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K120262, 1988–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HSX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HSX device

  1. #1 K261609 Freedom Partial Knee Systemscore 15.1 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K022211HLS Uni Evolution Prosthesis
Summary page 3
…Tomnier Torrier Zimmer -numrber pending j K022211 K880155 and K942263 The indications for use, the technical characteristics (materials, manufacturing princi…
Tornier2003—
*K880155Miller/Galante Precoat Unicompartmental Knee
Summary page 2
…___________ 6) Equivalent / Predicate device HLS Uni Evolution, Terrier, K0222l11 M!C Miller-Galante Unicomparimental Knee System, Zimmer, Inc., K880155 and K942263 7) Device description The usual goal of a unicompartmental knee prosthesis is to restore the knee joi…
Zimmer, Inc.19881
*K942263Miller/Galante Precoat Unicompartmental Knee System
Summary page 2
…__ 6) Equivalent / Predicate device HLS Uni Evolution, Terrier, K0222l11 M!C Miller-Galante Unicomparimental Knee System, Zimmer, Inc., K880155 and K942263 7) Device description The usual goal of a unicompartmental knee prosthesis is to restore the knee joint to its be…
Zimmer, Inc.19951

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9.2 years on median.
  • 3 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All HSX devices

HSX Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HSX

4in 2025

2007: 62008: 42009: 22010: 32011: 12012: 52013: 22015: 12016: 32017: 52018: 22019: 72020: 42021: 72022: 22023: 12024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2019) · low 0 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HSX

59in 2025

2007: 33 days median2008: 102 days median2010: 74 days median2012: 88 days median2016: 147 days median2017: 160 days median2019: 90 days median2020: 40 days median2021: 81 days median2024: 133 days median2025: 59 days median
2007high 160 (2017) · low 33 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HSX

2in 2020

2009: 492013: 12016: 12017: 42020: 2
2007high 49 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HSX

175in 2025

2007: 62008: 42009: 212010: 582011: 1142012: 832013: 792014: 662015: 572016: 1072017: 1132018: 1592019: 1772020: 2732021: 2402022: 2572023: 2312024: 1722025: 175
2007high 273 (2020) · low 4 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HSX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200763306
2008410204
20092—4921
2010374058
20111—0114
2012588083
20132—179
20140—066
20151—057
201631471107
201751604113
20182—0159
20197900177
20204402273
20217810240
20222—0257
20231—0231
202441330172
20254590175
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The HLS Uni Evolution and U-KneeTec unicompartmental knee prostheses are indicated for the replacement of the medial or lateral compartment of the femorotibial knee joint when only one compartment is affected, in order to reduce pain and restore knee function in comparison with preoperative status.

These devices are indicated in the treatment of primary or secondary femorotibial osteoarthritis. The HLS Uni Evolution and U-KneeTec knee prostheses are intended for cemented use only.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K120262: HLS Uni Evolution & U-Kneetec.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K120262

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026