510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-Mini

K120357510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 20, 2012318-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · FEB Accessories, Cleaning, For Endoscope

Cleared on Dec 20, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K103264 (Olympus Medical Systems Corporation, 2011) after a 318-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Dec 20, 2012
Review
318 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FEB
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K914145 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK914145 DSD-91(TM) Disinfector for Flexible EndoscopesMedivators, Inc. · 1994 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK093106 Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-ProOlympus Medical Systems Corporation · 2010
  3. 1 generation backK103264 Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-Pro Model Oer-ProOlympus Medical Systems Corporation · 2011 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK120357 Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-MiniOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K914145DSD-91(TM) Disinfector for Flexible EndoscopesMedivators, Inc.19941
−2K093106Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-ProOlympus Medical Systems Corporation2010—
−1K103264Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-Pro Model Oer-ProOlympus Medical Systems Corporation20116
0 (this device)K120357Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-MiniOlympus Medical Systems Corp.2012—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K120357, 1994–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FEB device

  1. #1 K243433 enspire 3000 Cleaning and Liquid Chemical…score 10.9 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K103264Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-Pro Model Oer-Pro
Summary page 1
…under Section 514 of FD&C Act. o) Predicate Device (PD) * Device Trade Name ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR OER-Pro * 5 10(k) Number K103264 * Manufacturer AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. OLYMPUS AMERICA INC.…
Olympus Medical Systems Corporation20116

Also cleared against K103264: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 31, 2025Class IIZ-0874-2026Under Investigation by firmInform existing affected device customers about pertinent Warnings/Cautions, existing recommended maintenance schedules and that only properly trained personnel conduct repairs and maintenance.
May 26, 2023Class IIZ-2343-2023Labeling Change ControlRevised OER-Pro, OER-Elite, OER-Mini endoscope reprocessor labeling- the LF-V and LF-P are no longer compatible endoscopes for reprocessing in the OERs. The addendum highlights the following changes: 1. Removal of LF-V and LF-P as…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • 2 of the 3 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K103264.

How does its category compare?

All FEB devices

FEB Accessories, Cleaning, For Endoscope: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FEB

2in 2024

2007: 22008: 12009: 12010: 22011: 32012: 12013: 12014: 12016: 22017: 22018: 12019: 22020: 22022: 12023: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FEB

111in 2011

2011: 111 days median
2007high 111 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FEB

15so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 32010: 12016: 22020: 12021: 12023: 12024: 12025: 32026 (partial year): 15
2007high 15 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FEB

356in 2025

2007: 392008: 1522009: 202010: 502011: 322012: 162013: 272014: 482015: 922016: 1032017: 692018: 882019: 622020: 4262021: 5752022: 6072023: 9982024: 8842025: 356
2007high 998 (2023) · low 16 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—039
20081—3152
20091—020
20102—150
20113111032
20121—016
20131—027
20141—048
20150—092
20162—2103
20172—069
20181—088
20192—062
20202—1426
20210—1575
20221—0607
20231—1998
20242—1884
20250—3356
20261—15—

What is it indicated for?

The OER-Mini is intended for use in cleaning and high-level disinfection of heat sensitive Olympus flexible endoscopes, camera heads, light guide cables, miniature light sources, and their accessories. Safe use requires detergent and an FDA-cleared high-level disinfectant/sterilant that Olympus has validated to be efficacious and compatible with the materials of the OER-Mini and Olympus flexible endoscopes, camera heads, light guide cables, miniature…

Read the full statement (133 words)

The OER-Mini is intended for use in cleaning and high-level disinfection of heat sensitive Olympus flexible endoscopes, camera heads, light guide cables, miniature light sources, and their accessories. Safe use requires detergent and an FDA-cleared high-level disinfectant/sterilant that Olympus has validated to be efficacious and compatible with the materials of the OER-Mini and Olympus flexible endoscopes, camera heads, light guide cables, miniature light sources, and their accessories. Use of a detergent or high-level disinfectant/sterilant that has not been validated by Olympus may be ineffective and may damage the OER-Mini components and the endoscopes being reprocessed. Endoscopes must be subject to cleaning by the user prior to reprocessing; however, use of the OER-Mini enables the user to perform modified manual cleaning of the endoscope prior to automated cleaning and high-level disinfection in the OER-Mini.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K120357: Endoscope Reprocessor Oer-Mini.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K120357

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026