510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

MIPAL

K120470510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 8, 2012113-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2910

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Watermark Medical · DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency

Cleared on Jun 8, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K061087 (Honeywell Hommed, LLC, 2006) after a 113-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2004.

Decided
Jun 8, 2012
Review
113 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRG
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K040799 (2004). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK040799 Hommed Genesis Patient Monitor System with OptionsHommed, LLC · 2004
  2. 1 generation backK061087 Genesis Otc MonitorHoneywell Hommed, LLC · 2006
  3. This deviceK120470 MIPALWatermark Medical · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K040799Hommed Genesis Patient Monitor System with OptionsHommed, LLC2004—
−1K061087Genesis Otc MonitorHoneywell Hommed, LLC2006—
0 (this device)K120470MIPALWatermark Medical2012—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K120470, 2004–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRG device

  1. #1 K223711 ANNE Onescore 20.8 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K061087Genesis Otc Monitor
Summary page 1
…Contact: Michael J. Leigh. consultant 12715 Falcon Drive Brookfield, Wisconsin 53005 Ph: (262) 957-6797 Trade Name: MiPal Predicate Device: Honeywell HomMed Genesis OTC, K061087 Common Name: Patient Vital Signs Monitor Classification Name: Regulation | Product Classification Name Device Number Code Class 8…
Honeywell Hommed, LLC2006—

Also cleared against K061087: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.0 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K061087.

How does its category compare?

All DRG devices

DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DRG

3in 2025

2007: 62008: 52009: 132010: 102011: 92012: 122013: 132014: 102015: 22016: 22017: 72018: 62019: 52020: 62021: 22022: 62023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2009) · low 2 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRG

127in 2025

2007: 63 days median2008: 74 days median2009: 94 days median2010: 68 days median2011: 104 days median2012: 103 days median2013: 146 days median2014: 177 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 220 days median2019: 122 days median2020: 159 days median2022: 287 days median2023: 212 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 127 days median
2007high 287 (2022) · low 63 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRG

3in 2007

2007: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRG

52in 2025

2007: 142008: 92009: 52010: 132011: 122012: 92013: 132014: 972015: 1312016: 1822017: 4842018: 1662019: 702020: 822021: 1072022: 432023: 192024: 262025: 52
2007high 484 (2017) · low 5 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007663314
200857409
2009139405
20101068013
20119104012
20121210309
201313146013
201410177097
20152—0131
20162—0182
20177980484
201862200166
20195122070
20206159082
20212—0107
20226287043
20234212019
20243125026
20253127052
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

MiPal allows the user to collect vital signs data (including noninvasive blood pressure, pulse rate, weight and other data from optional add-on devices). The user can then transmit the data to a central database via a communication network. Use of the system allows retrospective review of certain physiological functions by qualified health care professionals. It is not intended for real-time, emergency, or critical care monitoring of patient vital signs. The MiPal is intended for use with adult and pediatric patients over twelve years of age.

SpO2 is to be used under the direction of licensed health care professionals, and is available only by or on the order of a physician.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K120470: MIPAL.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K120470

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026