510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Diamond Calibrator Low, Diamond Calibrator High

K121027510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 20, 2012260-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.1150

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Diamond Diagnostics, Inc. · JIT Calibrator, Secondary

Cleared on Dec 20, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K945271 (Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems, Inc., 1995) after a 260-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 20, 2012
Review
260 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JIT
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K945271 (1995). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2014: 1 descendant clearedK945271 · Atac 8000 Random Access Chemistry System · Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems, Inc. · 1995 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K945271 · Atac 8000 Random Access Chemistry System · Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems, Inc. · 1995 · recalled0
  1. Root · 1 generation backK945271 Atac 8000 Random Access Chemistry SystemBio-Chem Laboratory Systems, Inc. · 1995 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK121027 Diamond Calibrator Low, Diamond Calibrator HighDiamond Diagnostics, Inc. · 2012
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK133751 Diamond Diagnostics Ise Serum Standards, Diamond Diagnostics Ise…Diamond Diagnostics, Inc. · 2014

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K133751Diamond Diagnostics Ise Serum Standards, Diamond Diagnostics Ise Urine StandardsDiamond Diagnostics, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K945271Atac 8000 Random Access Chemistry SystemBio-Chem Laboratory Systems, Inc.19951
0 (this device)K121027Diamond Calibrator Low, Diamond Calibrator HighDiamond Diagnostics, Inc.2012—
+1K133751Diamond Diagnostics Ise Serum Standards, Diamond Diagnostics Ise Urine StandardsDiamond Diagnostics, Inc.2014—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K121027, 1995–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JIT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K945271Atac 8000 Random Access Chemistry System
Summary page 2
…Page 2 === Predicate Device: ATAC 8000 /Envoy 500 ISE Calibrators Predicate 510(k) number(s): K945271 Comparison with predicate: Chaactrisics Diamond ATAC BOOOIEnvoy 500 ISE ATAC 8000…
Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems, Inc.19951

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K133751Diamond Diagnostics Ise Serum Standards, Diamond Diagnostics Ise Urine StandardsDiamond Diagnostics, Inc.20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K133751 (Diamond Diagnostics, Inc., 2014) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All JIT devices

JIT Calibrator, Secondary: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JIT

7in 2017

2007: 52008: 62009: 22010: 62011: 72012: 22013: 52014: 102015: 42016: 42017: 7
2007high 10 (2014) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JIT

28in 2017

2007: 78 days median2008: 46 days median2010: 65 days median2011: 48 days median2013: 140 days median2014: 33 days median2015: 30 days median2016: 33 days median2017: 28 days median
2007high 140 (2013) · low 28 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JIT

1in 2023

2007: 12009: 22011: 32012: 32014: 22015: 12018: 52020: 22023: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JIT

7in 2025

2010: 32011: 22012: 102013: 432014: 92015: 62016: 32017: 72018: 82019: 2152020: 122021: 32022: 42023: 62024: 172025: 7
2007high 215 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JIT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200757810
200864600
20092—20
201066503
201174832
20122—310
20135140043
2014103329
201543016
201643303
201772807
20180—58
20190—0215
20200—212
20210—03
20220—04
20230—16
20240—017
20250—07
20260—1—

What is it indicated for?

Diamond Diagnostics Calibrators for ATAC 8000 and Envoy 500 instruments are intended to provide calibration points for the Nat, K+, Cl-' and CO 2 electrodes on the ATAC 8000 and Envoy 500 instruments.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K121027: Diamond Calibrator Low, Diamond Calibrator High.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K121027

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026