510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Tetris II

K122317510(k) SpecialCleared Aug 29, 201228-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Aug 29, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K022793 (Signus Medical, LLC, 2003) and 2 other predicates after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 2001. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Aug 29, 2012
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K010530 (2001). 23 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2003: 2 other ancestors2009: 2 other ancestors2008: 2 other ancestors2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 2 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors1984: 1 other ancestor2007: 2 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor2018: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant clearedK010530 · Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 2001K062083 · Synfix -LR · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007×4: 4 generations cleared close together, K072253 (2007), K073470 (2008), K080758 (2008), K082014 (2008) K111792 · Mobis, Moval, Semial, Tetrismodel Peek and Titanium, Kimba Model Standard and Mini · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 201219801990200020102020
  1. Root · 7 generations backK010530 Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl. · 2001
  2. 6 generations backK062083 Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007
  3. 5 generations backK072253 Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · Recalled
  4. 4 generations backK073470 Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351XXX and 48353XXXStryker Spine · 2008
  5. 3 generations backK080758 Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351 and 48353Stryker Corp. · 2008
  6. 2 generations backK082014 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacersStryker Corp. · 2008
  7. 1 generation backK111792 Mobis, Moval, Semial, Tetrismodel Peek and Titanium, Kimba Model…Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2012
  8. This deviceK122317 Tetris IISignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2012
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK241438 Signus Tetris™ St; Signus Tetris™ R StSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2024
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK181899 Roccia® PlifSilony Medical GmbH · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K241438Signus Tetris™ St; Signus Tetris™ R StSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K181899Roccia® PlifSilony Medical GmbH · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K010530Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl.2001—
−6K062083Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp2007—
−5K072253Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp20071
−4K073470Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351XXX and 48353XXXStryker Spine2008—
−3K080758Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351 and 48353Stryker Corp.2008—
−2K082014Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacersStryker Corp.2008—
−1K111792Mobis, Moval, Semial, Tetrismodel Peek and Titanium, Kimba Model Standard and…Signus Medizintechnik GmbH2012—
0 (this device)K122317Tetris IISignus Medizintechnik GmbH2012—
+1K241438Signus Tetris™ St; Signus Tetris™ R StSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2024—
+1K181899Roccia® PlifSilony Medical GmbH2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
199620
199920
200010
200110
200210
200320
200720
200820
200920

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201810
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K122317, 2001–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K022793Tetris Spinal Implant
Summary page 1
…l marker pins used in the PEEK devices are manufactured from tantalum as described by ASTMV F560. Predicate Devices: Titanium TETRI STM (K022793) PEEK TETR ISTM (K031 757) PEEK and Titanium,TETRIS TM (Ki111792)…
Signus Medical, LLC2003—
*K031757Peek Tetris Spinal Implant
Summary page 1
…red from tantalum as described by ASTMV F560. Predicate Devices: Titanium TETRI STM (K022793) PEEK TETR ISTM (K031 757) PEEK and Titanium,TETRIS TM (Ki111792)…
Signus Medical, LLC2003—
*K111792Mobis, Moval, Semial, Tetrismodel Peek and Titanium, Kimba Model Standard and Mini
Summary page 1
…60. Predicate Devices: Titanium TETRI STM (K022793) PEEK TETR ISTM (K031 757) PEEK and Titanium,TETRIS TM (Ki111792) Page 14…
Signus Medizintechnik GmbH2012—

Also cleared against K022793: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K241438Signus Tetris™ St; Signus Tetris™ R StSignus Medizintechnik GmbH20240
K181899Roccia® PlifSilony Medical GmbH20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6 months on median.
  • 2 of the 23 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K241438 (Signus Medizintechnik GmbH, 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K022793.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the TETRI STM 11 devices are indicated for use to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The device is intended for use as a vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine (from Ti to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. When used as an intervertebral fusion device, the TETRIS~m 11devices are intended for use at one level in…

Read the full statement (154 words)

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the TETRI STM 11 devices are indicated for use to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The device is intended for use as a vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine (from Ti to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental internal fixation.

When used as an intervertebral fusion device, the TETRIS~m 11devices are intended for use at one level in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDID is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The devices are intended for use with a supplemental internal fixation system and with autograft to facilitate fusion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K122317: Tetris II.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K122317

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026