510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2013

Trusculpt

K122389510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 2, 201287-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4400Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cutera, Inc. · PBX Massager, Vacuum, Radio Frequency Induced Heat

Cleared on Nov 2, 2012 after an 87-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 67 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Nov 2, 2012
Review
87 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PBX
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

67 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2014: 2 descendants cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2017: 4 descendants cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2019: 5 descendants cleared2020: 4 descendants cleared2023: 12 descendants cleared2025: 6 descendants cleared2024: 7 descendants cleared2022: 7 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2026: 7 descendants cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK122389 TrusculptCutera, Inc. · 2012
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 48 of its ownK132949 PellefirmEllman International, Inc. · 2014
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 39 of its ownK133739 TrusculptCutera, Inc. · 2014
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 16 of its ownK171262 TempSureCynosure, Inc. · 2017
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 16 of its ownK143040 Exilis XPBTL Industries, Inc. · 2015
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 15 of its ownK182365 TempSure SystemCynosure, Inc. · 2018

Showing 5 of 67 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2014: 22015: 32016: 32017: 42018: 32019: 52020: 42021: 42022: 72023: 122024: 72025: 62026: 7
2014high 12 (2023) · low 2 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 67 · See all
  • K132949PellefirmEllman International, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly48descendants
  • K133739TrusculptCutera, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly39descendants
  • K171262TempSureCynosure, Inc. · 2017 · 2 generations on16descendants
  • K143040Exilis XPBTL Industries, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on16descendants
  • K182365TempSure SystemCynosure, Inc. · 2018 · 3 generations on15descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K122389TrusculptCutera, Inc.2012—
+1K132949PellefirmEllman International, Inc.2014—
+1K133739TrusculptCutera, Inc.2014—
+2K171262TempSureCynosure, Inc.2017—
+2K143040Exilis XPBTL Industries, Inc.2015—
+3K182365TempSure SystemCynosure, Inc.2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201420
201530
201630
201740
201830
201950
202040
202140
202270
2023120
202470
202560
202670
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K122389, 2012–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PBX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PBX device

  1. #1 K210877 Evolve System with the T3 Applicatorscore 23.6 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (67)

See all 67

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K132949PellefirmEllman International, Inc.201448
K133739TrusculptCutera, Inc.201439

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 16, 2013Class IIZ-0427-2014Employee errorCutera received two adverse events associated with the edge of the electrode, when it was pressed against neck skin over the thyroid cartilage and due to the absence of adequate underlying conductive tissue, increased skin heating…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K132949 (Ellman International, Inc., 2014) has gone furthest, with 48 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All PBX devices

PBX Massager, Vacuum, Radio Frequency Induced Heat: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PBX

7in 2025

2012: 12014: 22015: 52016: 72017: 62018: 32019: 82020: 82021: 62022: 72023: 92024: 62025: 72026 (partial year): 6
2007high 9 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PBX

200in 2025

2015: 181 days median2016: 130 days median2017: 132 days median2018: 89 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 134 days median2021: 169 days median2022: 308 days median2023: 227 days median2024: 130 days median2025: 200 days median2026 (partial year): 225 days median
2007high 308 (2022) · low 89 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · PBX

1in 2017

2017: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · PBX

4in 2025

2013: 122014: 42016: 22017: 12018: 12019: 42020: 42021: 82022: 72023: 72024: 22025: 4
2007high 12 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PBX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20121—00
20130—012
20142—04
2015518100
2016713002
2017613211
201838901
2019814704
2020813404
2021616908
2022730807
2023922707
2024613002
2025720004
202662250—

What is it indicated for?

The truScuipt infrared(optional) and RE energies are intended to provide topical heating for the purpose of elevating tissue temperature for the treatment of selected medical conditions such as relief of pain, muscle spasms, and increase in local circulation.

The truSculpt massage device is intended to provide a temporary reduction in the appearance of cellulite.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K122389: Trusculpt.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K122389

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026