510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ostavi Hydrophilic Guidewire

K124052510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 26, 201357-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lake Region Medical · OCY Endoscopic Guidewire, Gastroenterology-Urology

Cleared on Feb 26, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K081708 (Lake Region Mfg., Inc., 2008) and 1 other predicate after a 57-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1992.

Decided
Feb 26, 2013
Review
57 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OCY
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K922302 (1992). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestorK922302 · Jagwire (TM) Recanalization Guidewire · Boston Scientific Corp · 1992K081708 · Taxi Endoscopic Guidewire · Lake Region Mfg., Inc. · 2008199019952000200520102015
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K081708 · Taxi Endoscopic Guidewire · Lake Region Mfg., Inc. · 2008K922302 · Jagwire (TM) Recanalization Guidewire · Boston Scientific Corp · 19920
  1. Root · 2 generations backK922302 Jagwire (TM) Recanalization GuidewireBoston Scientific Corp · 1992
  2. 1 generation backK081708 Taxi Endoscopic GuidewireLake Region Mfg., Inc. · 2008
  3. This deviceK124052 Ostavi Hydrophilic GuidewireLake Region Medical · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K922302Jagwire (TM) Recanalization GuidewireBoston Scientific Corp1992—
−1K081708Taxi Endoscopic GuidewireLake Region Mfg., Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K124052Ostavi Hydrophilic GuidewireLake Region Medical2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K124052, 1992–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OCY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K081708Taxi Endoscopic Guidewire
Summary page 1
…nterology/Urology (OCY). This type of Guidewire was originally listed as a Class 11device by the Gastroenterology/Urology (OCY) review panel. IDNIIAIWF06f K081708F Lake Region Medical ' Taxi Endoscopic Guidewire K(000011 Lake Region Medical…
Lake Region Mfg., Inc.2008—
*K000011Modified Hydrophilic Coated Guidewire
Summary page 2
…708. The NaviProTM Guidewire is the exact same design as the ZlPwire, with a different intended use, legally marketed by Lake Region Medical and cleared by 510(k) K000011. The NaviProTM Guidewire has the exact same physical characteristics as the secondary predicate device (ZlPwire). The safe…
Lake Region Mfg., Inc.2000—

Also cleared against K081708: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 16.1 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K081708.

How does its category compare?

All OCY devices

OCY Endoscopic Guidewire, Gastroenterology-Urology: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OCY

1in 2016

2007: 12008: 32009: 12012: 22013: 42014: 52015: 32016: 1
2007high 5 (2014) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OCY

51in 2015

2008: 55 days median2013: 60 days median2014: 41 days median2015: 51 days median
2007high 60 (2013) · low 41 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OCY

8in 2019

2019: 8
2007high 8 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OCY

133in 2025

2007: 32008: 72009: 72010: 92011: 32012: 12013: 322014: 512015: 2832016: 1582017: 852018: 1012019: 1032020: 1282021: 942022: 1342023: 1152024: 1312025: 133
2007high 283 (2015) · low 1 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OCY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—03
200835507
20091—07
20100—09
20110—03
20122—01
2013460032
2014541051
20153510283
20161—0158
20170—085
20180—0101
20190—8103
20200—0128
20210—094
20220—0134
20230—0115
20240—0131
20250—0133
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The endloscopic guidewire is intended for use in selective cannulation of the blilary ducts including, but not limited to the common bile, pancreatic, cystic, right and left hepatic ducts. The endloscopic guidewire is designed to be used during endloscopic pancreatic-biliary procedures for catheter Introduction and exchanges of catheters, cannulas and sphicterotornes.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K124052: Ostavi Hydrophilic Guidewire.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K124052

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026