510(k) · Cleared
ClearedSurecall Labor Monitor
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Reproductive Research Technologies, LP · OSP Uterine Electromyographic Monitor
Cleared on Jun 28, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K090145 (Reproductive Research Technologies, LP, 2011) after a 177-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1995.
- Decided
- Jun 28, 2013
- Review
- 177 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- OSP
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K950420 (1995). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest K843385 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 3 generations backK950420 Fetalgard 3000 - Models IP1, IP2, AP2 and AP3Analogic Corp. · 1995
- 2 generations backK983395 Fetalgard 3000 Fetal MonitorAnalogic Corp. · 1999
- 1 generation backK090145 Surecall Emg Labor MonitorReproductive Research Technologies, LP · 2011
- This deviceK130002 Surecall Labor MonitorReproductive Research Technologies, LP · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 | K950420 | Fetalgard 3000 - Models IP1, IP2, AP2 and AP3 | Analogic Corp. | 1995 | — |
| −2 | K983395 | Fetalgard 3000 Fetal Monitor | Analogic Corp. | 1999 | — |
| −1 | K090145 | Surecall Emg Labor Monitor | Reproductive Research Technologies, LP | 2011 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K130002 | Surecall Labor Monitor | Reproductive Research Technologies, LP | 2013 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in OSP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new OSP device
- #1 K190798 LaborView™ LV1000 Wireless Electrode Systemscore 0.9 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K090145 | Surecall Emg Labor MonitorSummary page 1…Predicate Device: The SureCALL® Labor Monitor® is substantially equivalent to other Uterine Contraction Monitors in the market such as the SureCALL™ EMG Labor Monitor [K090145]. Section 5 510(k) Submission Page # ©2012 Reproductive Research Technologies, LP — All Rights Reserved Revised 510(k) Summary… | 2011 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.2 years on median.
- None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
- 1 other device also cites its predicate K090145.
How does its category compare?
All OSP devicesOSP Uterine Electromyographic Monitor: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · OSP
1in 2020
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · OSP
220in 2011
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · OSP
No recall names OSP since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · OSP
1in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code OSP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3 | 220 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The SureCALL® Labor Monitor® is a transabdominal electromyography (EMG) monitor intended to measure uterine activity. It is intended for use on pregnant women who are at term (>36 completed weeks), with singleton pregnancies, using surface electrodes on the maternal abdomen. The device is intended for use by healthcare professionals in a clinical setting.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K130002 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K130002: Surecall Labor Monitor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130002
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026