510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Mepitel AG

K130040510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 12, 2014401-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Molnlycke Health Care · FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug

Cleared on Feb 12, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K984371 (Molnlycke Health Care, Inc., 1999) and 1 other predicate after a 401-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1997.

Decided
Feb 12, 2014
Review
401 days
Class
Class U
Product code
FRO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K970566 (1997). 17 ancestors in all, the oldest K871166 (1987). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK970566 Arglaes Film DressingMaersk Medical, Ltd. · 1997
  2. 5 generations backK990810 Arglaes-AB Antimicrobial Barrier Film Dressing & Island DressingMaersk Medical, Ltd. · 1999
  3. 4 generations backK013525 Contreet-H Antimicrobial Hydrocolloid Dressing, Models 9610 (4 X 4…Coloplast Corp. · 2002
  4. 3 generations backK061220 Urgotul AGLaboratoires Urgo · 2006
  5. 2 generations backK062559 Urgocell AG Antimicrobial Wound Dressing with SilverLaboratoires Urgo · 2007
  6. 1 generation backK100430 Urgotul AG, Antimicrobial Wound Dressing with SilverLaboratoires Urgo · 2010
  7. This deviceK130040 Mepitel AGMolnlycke Health Care · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K970566Arglaes Film DressingMaersk Medical, Ltd.1997—
−5K990810Arglaes-AB Antimicrobial Barrier Film Dressing & Island DressingMaersk Medical, Ltd.1999—
−4K013525Contreet-H Antimicrobial Hydrocolloid Dressing, Models 9610 (4 X 4 (10 CM X…Coloplast Corp.2002—
−3K061220Urgotul AGLaboratoires Urgo2006—
−2K062559Urgocell AG Antimicrobial Wound Dressing with SilverLaboratoires Urgo2007—
−1K100430Urgotul AG, Antimicrobial Wound Dressing with SilverLaboratoires Urgo2010—
0 (this device)K130040Mepitel AGMolnlycke Health Care2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
199210
199410
199510
199710
199820
199910
200010
200110
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K130040, 1997–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FRO device

  1. #1 K261023 Microdacyn Wound Irrigation Solutionscore 15.5 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K984371Mepitel Non Adherent Silicone Dressing
Summary page 2
…o clinical data was required. Conclusion: Based on the information presented in this submission, it can be concluded that the Mepitel® Ag is equivalent to the Mepitel® (K984371) and the Urgotul® Ag (K100430) predicate devices with respect to intended use, materials, design, and technological characteristi…
Molnlycke Health Care, Inc.1999—
*K100430Urgotul AG, Antimicrobial Wound Dressing with Silver
Summary page 2
…Conclusion: Based on the information presented in this submission, it can be concluded that the Mepitel® Ag is equivalent to the Mepitel® (K984371) and the Urgotul® Ag (K100430) predicate devices with respect to intended use, materials, design, and technological characteristics. *DEPARTMEN…
Laboratoires Urgo2010—

Also cleared against K984371: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.4 years on median.
  • None of the 17 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K984371.

How does its category compare?

All FRO devices

FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FRO

11in 2025

2007: 292008: 262009: 312010: 312011: 272012: 242013: 192014: 222015: 282016: 282017: 232018: 202019: 162020: 122021: 82022: 92023: 182024: 242025: 112026 (partial year): 17
2007high 31 (2009) · low 8 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FRO

176in 2025

2007: 187 days median2008: 130 days median2009: 136 days median2010: 146 days median2011: 177 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 194 days median2014: 214 days median2015: 249 days median2016: 222 days median2017: 147 days median2018: 206 days median2019: 270 days median2020: 226 days median2021: 275 days median2022: 332 days median2023: 283 days median2024: 263 days median2025: 176 days median2026 (partial year): 254 days median
2007high 332 (2022) · low 96 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FRO

2in 2024

2007: 42008: 12009: 12011: 42013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 32017: 12019: 12021: 62022: 22023: 2, 2 Class I2024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2021) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FRO

192in 2025

2007: 552008: 302009: 452010: 1222011: 422012: 652013: 1392014: 2692015: 2972016: 1472017: 1492018: 1282019: 1362020: 1392021: 1832022: 1762023: 1982024: 2322025: 192
2007high 297 (2015) · low 30 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200729187455
200826130130
200931136145
2010311460122
201127177442
20122496065
2013191941139
2014222141269
2015282492297
2016282223147
2017231471149
2018202060128
2019162701136
2020122260139
202182756183
202293322176
2023182832 (2)198
2024242632232
2025111760192
2026172542—

What is it indicated for?

MelpiteP Ag is intended for the management of a wide range of exuding wounds such as skin tears, skin abrasions, sutured/surgical wounds, partial thickness burns, partial and ful thickness grafts, lacerations, diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, end arterial ulcers. Silver Sulphate is added to the dressing as a preservative to inhibit or reduce microbial growth on the dressing.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K130040: Mepitel AG.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130040

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026