510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case for Rigid Gas Permeable Lens

K130285510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 3, 201357-day reviewClass II21 CFR 886.5928

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

The Lagado Corp. · LRX Case, Contact Lens

Cleared on Apr 3, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K991206 (Bonasse Ent. Co., Ltd., 2000) and 1 other predicate after a 57-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2000.

Decided
Apr 3, 2013
Review
57 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LRX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K002140 (2000). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K991206 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK002140 Menicon Progent RemoverMenicon Co, Ltd. · 2000
  2. 2 generations backK082855 Menicon Progent Protein Remover for Rigid Gas Permeable Contact LensesMenicon Co, Ltd. · 2010
  3. 1 generation backK122273 Menicon Progent Protein Remover for Rigid Gas Permeable Contact LensMenicon Co, Ltd. · 2013
  4. This deviceK130285 Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case for Rigid Gas Permeable LensThe Lagado Corp. · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K002140Menicon Progent RemoverMenicon Co, Ltd.2000—
−2K082855Menicon Progent Protein Remover for Rigid Gas Permeable Contact LensesMenicon Co, Ltd.2010—
−1K122273Menicon Progent Protein Remover for Rigid Gas Permeable Contact LensMenicon Co, Ltd.2013—
0 (this device)K130285Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case for Rigid Gas Permeable LensThe Lagado Corp.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K130285, 2000–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LRX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LRX device

  1. #1 K240095 CAREUS Contact Lens Case (Model 1, Model 2…score 15.3 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K991206Bonasse Contact Lens Case
Summary page 1
…ontact Lens Case For Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses 3. Predicate Devices Lagado Corporation claims substantial equivalence to K991206 Bonasse Non-Vented Barrel Style Contact Lens Case and the Progent SP Vial cleared in 510(k) K 122273. 4. Description o…
Bonasse Ent. Co., Ltd.2000—
*K122273Menicon Progent Protein Remover for Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lens
Summary page 1
…Lagado Corporation claims substantial equivalence to K991206 Bonasse Non-Vented Barrel Style Contact Lens Case and the Progent SP Vial cleared in 510(k) K 122273. 4. Description of Device The Menicon Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case is a non-vented barrel style contact len…
Menicon Co, Ltd.2013—

Also cleared against K991206: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K991206.

How does its category compare?

All LRX devices

LRX Case, Contact Lens: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LRX

1in 2025

2007: 12009: 12010: 12011: 22012: 32013: 42014: 32015: 22016: 22017: 52023: 12024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2017) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LRX

49in 2017

2012: 103 days median2013: 72 days median2014: 249 days median2017: 49 days median
2007high 249 (2014) · low 49 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LRX

No recall names LRX since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LRX

1in 2021

2012: 12014: 12017: 32021: 1
2007high 3 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LRX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20091—00
20101—00
20112—00
2012310301
201347200
2014324901
20152—00
20162—00
201754903
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—01
20220—00
20231—00
20241—00
20251—00
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Menicon Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case is only intended for use with the Menicon Progent Protein Remover for Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) Contact Lenses.

The Menicon Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case provides an alternative lens case to hold large diameter lenses (11I mm to 23 mm) during the Menicon Progent Protein Remover treatment. The case is not intended for disinfection (chemical, heat or peroxide). The case is not intended for lens storage.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K130285: Progent Large Diameter Contact Lens Case for Rigid Gas Permeable Lens.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130285

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026