510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Compressible Limb Sleeve System

K130385510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 18, 2014368-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5650

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Maxstar Industrial Co., Ltd. · IRP Massager, Powered Inflatable Tube

Cleared on Feb 18, 2014 after a 368-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 18, 2014
Review
368 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IRP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2019: 1 descendant cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK130385 Compressible Limb Sleeve SystemMaxstar Industrial Co., Ltd. · 2014
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK173158 Air RelaxMaxstar Industrial Co., Ltd. · 2019

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K173158Air RelaxMaxstar Industrial Co., Ltd. · 2019 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K130385Compressible Limb Sleeve SystemMaxstar Industrial Co., Ltd.2014—
+1K173158Air RelaxMaxstar Industrial Co., Ltd.2019—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K130385, 2014–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IRP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IRP device

  1. #1 K193354 Air Compression Therapy Devicescore 28.6 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K173158Air RelaxMaxstar Industrial Co., Ltd.20190

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K173158 (Maxstar Industrial Co., Ltd., 2019) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IRP devices

IRP Massager, Powered Inflatable Tube: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IRP

13in 2025

2007: 22008: 12009: 12010: 22011: 32012: 52013: 22014: 42015: 22016: 12017: 42018: 32019: 102020: 92021: 192022: 142023: 102024: 122025: 132026 (partial year): 12
2007high 19 (2021) · low 1 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IRP

141in 2025

2011: 164 days median2012: 116 days median2014: 113 days median2017: 170 days median2018: 80 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 150 days median2021: 140 days median2022: 97 days median2023: 143 days median2024: 115 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 172 days median
2007high 172 (2026) · low 80 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IRP

2in 2017

2011: 12017: 2
2007high 2 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IRP

10in 2025

2008: 22009: 12010: 52011: 32012: 32015: 32016: 22020: 12022: 12024: 42025: 10
2007high 10 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IRP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20081—02
20091—01
20102—05
2011316413
2012511603
20132—00
2014411300
20152—03
20161—02
2017417020
201838000
2019108300
2020915001
20211914000
2022149701
20231014300
20241211504
202513141010
2026121720—

What is it indicated for?

UAM-8 100 is intended for use by medical professionals and patients at home, who are under medical supervision, in treating many conditions, such as: Primary lymphedema, Edema following trauma and sport injuries, Postimrnobilization edema, Venous insufficiencies, Lymphedema.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K130385: Compressible Limb Sleeve System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130385

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026