510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Smith & Nephew Global Femoral Head Trials

K132435510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 22, 201378-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented

Cleared on Oct 22, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K113039 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2012) after a 78-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1991.

Decided
Oct 22, 2013
Review
78 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LZO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K911686 (1991). 62 ancestors in all, the oldest K800494 (1980). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2008: 3 other ancestors2007: 2 other ancestors2005: 3 other ancestors2004: 2 other ancestors1996: 5 other ancestors2006: 1 other ancestor2003: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 5 other ancestors1997: 5 other ancestors1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 6 other ancestors1992: 3 other ancestors2001: 3 other ancestors1998: 2 other ancestors1991: 1 other ancestor1985: 2 other ancestors1980: 2 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestor1984: 1 other ancestor1987: 1 other ancestorK911686 · Global Total Shoulder, Uncement Humeral Hemi-Shoul · Depuy, Inc. · 1991K984541 · Global FX Humeral Stem, Global Advantage Humeral Head · DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 1999K992065 · Global Advantage Shoulder, Global Advantage Humeral Stem, Global Advantage Eccentric Head · DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 1999K021478 · Delta Shoulder · Depuy, Inc. · 2003×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K030941 (2004), K041873 (2004) K053274 · Anatomical Shoulder Inverse/Reverse · Zimmer GmbH · 2006 · recalledK081016 · Smith & Nephew, Inc., Promos Reverse Shoulder System · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008 · recalledK113039 · Smith & Nephew Radiopaque Trial Necks · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 201219801985199019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 9 generations backK911686 Global Total Shoulder, Uncement Humeral Hemi-ShoulDepuy, Inc. · 1991
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK053274 Anatomical Shoulder Inverse/ReverseZimmer GmbH · 2006 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK081016 Smith & Nephew, Inc., Promos Reverse Shoulder SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK113039 Smith & Nephew Radiopaque Trial NecksSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012
  6. This deviceK132435 Smith & Nephew Global Femoral Head TrialsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2013
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK911686 Global Total Shoulder, Uncement Humeral Hemi-ShoulDepuy, Inc. · 1991
  2. 8 generations backK984541 Global FX Humeral Stem, Global Advantage Humeral HeadDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 1999
  3. 7 generations backK992065 Global Advantage Shoulder, Global Advantage Humeral Stem, Global…DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 1999
  4. 6 generations backK021478 Delta ShoulderDepuy, Inc. · 2003
  5. 5 generations backK030941 Aequalis Reversed Shoulder ProsthesisTornier · 2004
  6. 4 generations backK041873 Aequalis Reversed Shoulder ProsthesisTornier · 2004
  7. 3 generations backK053274 Anatomical Shoulder Inverse/ReverseZimmer GmbH · 2006 · Recalled
  8. 2 generations backK081016 Smith & Nephew, Inc., Promos Reverse Shoulder SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
  9. 1 generation backK113039 Smith & Nephew Radiopaque Trial NecksSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012
  10. This deviceK132435 Smith & Nephew Global Femoral Head TrialsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K911686Global Total Shoulder, Uncement Humeral Hemi-ShoulDepuy, Inc.1991—
−8K984541Global FX Humeral Stem, Global Advantage Humeral HeadDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.1999—
−7K992065Global Advantage Shoulder, Global Advantage Humeral Stem, Global Advantage…DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.1999—
−6K021478Delta ShoulderDepuy, Inc.2003—
−5K030941Aequalis Reversed Shoulder ProsthesisTornier2004—
−4K041873Aequalis Reversed Shoulder ProsthesisTornier2004—
−3K053274Anatomical Shoulder Inverse/ReverseZimmer GmbH20063
−2K081016Smith & Nephew, Inc., Promos Reverse Shoulder SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.20082
−1K113039Smith & Nephew Radiopaque Trial NecksSmith & Nephew, Inc.2012—
0 (this device)K132435Smith & Nephew Global Femoral Head TrialsSmith & Nephew, Inc.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198020
198410
198520
198710
199010
199110
199230
199460
199510
199650
199750
199820
199950
200010
200130
200320
200420
200530
200610
200720
200830
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K132435, 1991–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LZO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LZO device

  1. #1 K192827 Quadra-Pscore 19.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K113039Smith & Nephew Radiopaque Trial Necks
Summary page 3
…Head Trials Manufacturer Description Submission Clearance Date Smith &Nephew Radiopaque Trial Necks K113039 10/5/2012 Confidential 5-3 ==…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2012—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
  • 18 of the 61 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LZO devices

LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LZO

14in 2025

2007: 92008: 112009: 72010: 152011: 132012: 142013: 262014: 132015: 122016: 102017: 162018: 182019: 282020: 182021: 122022: 112023: 102024: 112025: 142026 (partial year): 9
2007high 28 (2019) · low 7 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LZO

119in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 63 days median2009: 83 days median2010: 78 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 98 days median2013: 100 days median2014: 85 days median2015: 115 days median2016: 177 days median2017: 257 days median2018: 163 days median2019: 109 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 170 days median2022: 279 days median2023: 122 days median2024: 111 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 102 days median
2007high 279 (2022) · low 63 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LZO

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 132009: 422011: 102012: 142014: 12015: 12016: 92017: 52018: 22019: 42020: 32022: 42023: 22024: 12025: 1
2007high 42 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LZO

3,244in 2025

2007: 1382008: 1252009: 1892010: 3942011: 5442012: 9632013: 1,3702014: 1,4772015: 1,3482016: 1,7282017: 2,1652018: 3,1332019: 3,0662020: 1,9632021: 2,1992022: 1,9852023: 2,0662024: 2,5862025: 3,244
2007high 3,244 (2025) · low 125 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LZO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20079872138
2008116313125
200978342189
201015780394
2011138710544
2012149814963
20132610001,370
2014138511,477
20151211511,348
20161017791,728
20171625752,165
20181816323,133
20192810943,066
20201811231,963
20211217002,199
20221127941,985
20231012222,066
20241111112,586
20251411913,244
202691020—

What is it indicated for?

Smith & Nephew Uncemented Femoral Stem Instruments are accessory devices and are intended to be used to assist in the implantation of Smith & Nephew Uncemented Hip Systems and their cleared Indications for Use. Uncemented Femoral Stems are indicated for uncemented use in individuals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed in rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of trauma, inflammatory joint disease such as…

Read the full statement (605 words)

Smith & Nephew Uncemented Femoral Stem Instruments are accessory devices and are intended to be used to assist in the implantation of Smith & Nephew Uncemented Hip Systems and their cleared Indications for Use.

Uncemented Femoral Stems are indicated for uncemented use in individuals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed in rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of trauma, inflammatory joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, or noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or any of its composite diagnoses such as osteoarthritis; avascular necrosis; traumatic arthritis; slipped capital epiphysis; fused hip; fracture of the pelvis; diastrophic variant; old, remote osteomyelitis with an extended drainage-free period; nonunion, femora[ neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques; femoral osteotomy. or Girdlestone resection; fracture dislocation of the hip; and correction of deformity.

Smith & Nephew Cemented Femoral Stem instruments are accessory devices and are intended to be used to assist in the implantation of Smith & Nephew Cemented Hip Systems and their cleared Indications for Use.

Cemented Femoral Stems are indicated for cemented use in individuals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed in rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of trauma, inflammatory joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, or noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or any of its composite diagnoses such as osteoarthritis; avascutar necrosis; traumatic arthritis; slipped capital epiphysis; fused hip; fracture of the pelvis; diastrophic variant; old, remote osteomyetitis with an extended drainage-free period; nonunion, femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques; femoral osteotomy, or Girdlestone resection; fracture dislocation of the hip; and correction of deformity.

Smith &Nephew PLUS Femoral Stem Instruments are accessory devices and are intended to be used to assist in the implantation of Smith &Nephew PLUS Hip Systems and their cleared Indications for Use.

Smith &Nephew Inc PLUS Femoral Stems are indicated for:

* The SL-PLUS Stem Primary isintended for treating patients who are candidates for total hip arlhroplasty because the natural femoral head and neck has been subject to disease or trauma. The SL-PLUS Stem is intended for advanced hip joint wear due to degenerative. posttraumatic or rheumatoid arthritis; fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

* The SLR-PLUS STEM, a revision component, isalso available to replace previously failed femoral him arthroplasties. Both components can be used with or without cement. These devices are intended to aid the surgeon in relieving the patient of hip pain and restoring hip motion.

* The SL-PLUS Lateralized Stem is intended for varus femur forms and trumpet shape of the proximal femur (champagne flute). These stems are for uncemented use only. These devices are intended to aid the surgeon in relieving the patient of hip pain and restoring hip motion.

* The SL-PLUS MIA Stem isindicated for indivduals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed in rehabilitating hips damaged as aresult of trauma or noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or any of its composhie diagnoses 'of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant.

* The POLARSTEM Standard and Lateral Femoral Stems are indicated for: advanced degeneration of the hip joint as a result of degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis, fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head, failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis. hemiarthroplasty. surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement, all forms of osteoarlhritis, patients with hips at risk of dislocation, and femoral neck fracture or proximal fracture to hip joint.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K132435: Smith & Nephew Global Femoral Head Trials.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K132435

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026