510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Encompass 10/12 Hip Stem

K132697510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 20, 2014295-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ortho Development Corp. · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Jun 20, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K053293 (Ortho Development Corp., 2006) and 3 other predicates after a 295-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1997.

Decided
Jun 20, 2014
Review
295 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to P960047 (1997). 42 ancestors in all, the oldest K830313 (1983). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2006: 1 other ancestor2002: 2 other ancestors1996: 4 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors1994: 9 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2000: 2 other ancestors1999: 3 other ancestors1997: 4 other ancestors1983: 1 other ancestor1998: 1 other ancestor1995: 3 other ancestors1986: 1 other ancestor1985: 1 other ancestorP960047 · Osteonics Constrained Acetabular Insert · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1997×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K021728 (2002), K030047 (2003) K043537 · Taperloc 12/14 Taper Femoral Components · Biomet, Inc. · 2005K062775 · European Style Taper,Press-Fit Hip Stem · Ortho Development Corp. · 2007 · recalledK131022 · Ovation 10/12 Hip Stem · Ortho Development Corp. · 201319801985199019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 6 generations backP960047 Osteonics Constrained Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1997
  2. 5 generations backK021728 Ringloc Constrained Liners IIBiomet, Inc. · 2002
  3. 4 generations backK030047 Freedom Constrained LinersBiomet, Inc. · 2003
  4. 3 generations backK043537 Taperloc 12/14 Taper Femoral ComponentsBiomet, Inc. · 2005
  5. 2 generations backK062775 European Style Taper,Press-Fit Hip StemOrtho Development Corp. · 2007 · Recalled
  6. 1 generation backK131022 Ovation 10/12 Hip StemOrtho Development Corp. · 2013
  7. This deviceK132697 Encompass 10/12 Hip StemOrtho Development Corp. · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6P960047Osteonics Constrained Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp.1997—
−5K021728Ringloc Constrained Liners IIBiomet, Inc.2002—
−4K030047Freedom Constrained LinersBiomet, Inc.2003—
−3K043537Taperloc 12/14 Taper Femoral ComponentsBiomet, Inc.2005—
−2K062775European Style Taper,Press-Fit Hip StemOrtho Development Corp.20074
−1K131022Ovation 10/12 Hip StemOrtho Development Corp.2013—
0 (this device)K132697Encompass 10/12 Hip StemOrtho Development Corp.2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198310
198510
198610
199490
199530
199640
199740
199810
199930
200020
200120
200220
200310
200510
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K132697, 1997–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K053293Encompass 10*17 and 12*17 Extended Press-Fit Hip Stems
Summary page 1
…porous-coated uncemented prosthesis Device Product Code: LPH, MBL Predicate Devices: Encompass' Press-Fit Hip Stem (K053293) Ortho Development PrimalocT" Cementless Hip System (K(953977) Ortho Development…
Ortho Development Corp.20062
*K953977Primaloc Cementless Hip System
Summary page 1
…BL Predicate Devices: Encompass' Press-Fit Hip Stem (K053293) Ortho Development PrimalocT" Cementless Hip System (K(953977) Ortho Development Ovation 10/12 Hip Stem (K(131022) Ortho Development…
Ortho Development Corp.19962
*K131022Ovation 10/12 Hip Stem
Cleared while this submission was under review
Summary page 1
…velopment PrimalocT" Cementless Hip System (K(953977) Ortho Development Ovation 10/12 Hip Stem (K(131022) Ortho Development Bi-Metric6 Porous Primary Femoral Component (K(020580) Biomet Device Des…
Ortho Development Corp.2013—
*K020580X-Series BI-Metric Hip Femoral Components
Summary page 2
…milarities to the predicate devices, and a review of the testing, the devices are substantially equivalent to femoral stem components that were cleared under K053293 and K020580. DEPARTNMENT OF HEALTH1 &I HUMAAN SERVICES Public I lealil, ervice…
Biomet, Inc.2002—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.0 years on median.
  • 8 of the 42 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

This device is intended for use in total hip arthroplasty. The device is intended for uncemented, press-fit use only in cases of:

1. Notably impaired hip joint due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and/or post traumatic arthritis

2. Previously failed surgery

3. Proximal femoral neck fractures or dislocation

4. Idiopathic avascular necrosis of the femoral head

5. Non-union of proximal femoral neck fractures

6. Treatment of fractures that are unmianageable using other forms of therapy

7. Benign or malignant bone tumors, congenital dysplasia or other structural abnormalities where sufficient bone stock exists to properly seat the prosthesis

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K132697: Encompass 10/12 Hip Stem.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K132697

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026