# K132700: Perimeter Interbody Fusion Device

- Pathway: 510(k) (Special)
- Applicant: Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
- Decided: Sep 26, 2013 after 28 days
- Product code: MAX (Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar)
- Device class: 2
- Regulation: 21 CFR 888.3080
- Recalls of this device: none
- Data: FDA decisions to Oct 25, 2026; recalls to Oct 12, 2026

## Lineage
Longest line of descent: 12 generations back to K841189 (1984). 40 ancestors in all.
170 later devices descend from it; 2 cite it directly.
0 of 211 devices in its family (counting itself) have a Class I recall.

## Predicates on the family tree (from the FDA summary)
- K111525: Perimeter Interbody Fusion Device, Medtronic Sofamor Danek (2011) Summary page 2.
- K090353: Perimeter Interbody Fusion Device, Medtronic Sofamor Danek (2009) Summary page 2.

## Most influential descendants
- K151310: Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices (2016), 169 descendants of its own
- K160924: Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices (2016), 166 descendants of its own
- K171496: Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage (2017), 129 descendants of its own
- K180364: HD LifeSciences Cervical IBFD System (2018), 106 descendants of its own
- K183557: Endoskeleton® TA Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TAS Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TO Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TT Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TC Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TCS Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TL Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TA Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) Device (2019), 104 descendants of its own

## Indications for use
The PERIMETER® Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for interbody fusion with autogenous bone graft in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to SI. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. These implants may be implanted via a variety of open or minimally invasive approaches. These approaches include anterior, lateral and oblique. These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation instrumentation. which has been cleared for use in the lumbar spine.

Source page: https://510kreport.com/device/K132700
Methodology: https://510kreport.com/methodology