510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

DMS 300-2W Holter Ecg Recorder

K133014510(k) SpecialCleared May 19, 2014236-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Diagnostic Monitoring Software · MWJ Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory (Without Analysis)

Cleared on May 19, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K062959 (Diagnostic Monitoring Software, 2006) after a 236-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1992.

Decided
May 19, 2014
Review
236 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MWJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K921068 (1992). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1994: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestorK921068 · Gikter Ecg Cassette Tape Recorder Model XR 300 · Datrix · 1992K982975 · Digital Ecg Holter Recorder, Model DR512 · Datrix · 1998×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K062007 (2006), K062959 (2006) 199019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 4 generations backK921068 Gikter Ecg Cassette Tape Recorder Model XR 300Datrix · 1992
  2. 3 generations backK982975 Digital Ecg Holter Recorder, Model DR512Datrix · 1998
  3. 2 generations backK062007 DMS 300-7Diagnostic Monitoring Software · 2006
  4. 1 generation backK062959 DMS 300-2, 300-3 and 300-4Diagnostic Monitoring Software · 2006
  5. This deviceK133014 DMS 300-2W Holter Ecg RecorderDiagnostic Monitoring Software · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K921068Gikter Ecg Cassette Tape Recorder Model XR 300Datrix1992—
−3K982975Digital Ecg Holter Recorder, Model DR512Datrix1998—
−2K062007DMS 300-7Diagnostic Monitoring Software2006—
−1K062959DMS 300-2, 300-3 and 300-4Diagnostic Monitoring Software2006—
0 (this device)K133014DMS 300-2W Holter Ecg RecorderDiagnostic Monitoring Software2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K133014, 1992–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MWJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MWJ device

  1. #1 K254119 Wearable ECG Recorder (YMHeart XY-12)…score 14.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K062959DMS 300-2, 300-3 and 300-4
Summary page 2
…. Hazard Risk Analysis. 10. Pictures. Legally 510(k) marketed device to which Substantial Equivalence is claimed: In October 2006, the FDA issued its 510(k) number K062959 for the DM5I Halter Recorder, Model 300-2, which is the predicate device for this submission. The Regulation Number was 21 CFR 87…
Diagnostic Monitoring Software2006—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.6 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All MWJ devices

MWJ Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory (Without Analysis): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MWJ

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 12009: 22010: 32011: 32012: 12013: 32014: 22016: 22018: 12021: 12022: 42024: 22026 (partial year): 5
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MWJ

337in 2022

2007: 142 days median2010: 90 days median2011: 206 days median2013: 241 days median2022: 337 days median2026 (partial year): 270 days median
2007high 337 (2022) · low 90 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MWJ

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MWJ

8in 2025

2009: 52012: 22013: 42014: 12015: 12016: 12017: 22018: 12019: 42020: 122021: 32022: 62023: 52024: 32025: 8
2007high 12 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MWJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007514200
20081—00
20092—05
201039000
2011320600
20121—02
2013324104
20142—01
20150—01
20162—01
20170—02
20181—01
20190—04
20200—012
20211—03
2022433706
20230—05
20242—23
20250—08
202652700—

What is it indicated for?

The "Indications for Use" of the modified 300-2W recorder are indicated for use in a clinical setting, by qualified medical professionals only, for recording multi-lead ECG data of patients during a minimum ambulatory time period of 24-hours. It is not a life support system, and is not connected to an AC power source. The "Indications for Use" of the modified 300-2W are exactly the same as the predicate devices (DMS 300-2 and 300-7). Ambulatory multi-day…

Read the full statement (119 words)

The "Indications for Use" of the modified 300-2W recorder are indicated for use in a clinical setting, by qualified medical professionals only, for recording multi-lead ECG data of patients during a minimum ambulatory time period of 24-hours. It is not a life support system, and is not connected to an AC power source. The "Indications for Use" of the modified 300-2W are exactly the same as the predicate devices (DMS 300-2 and 300-7). Ambulatory multi-day electrocardiography is used for the below indications:

- Evaluation of patients with symptoms suggesting arrhythmias

- Evaluation of patients with pacemakers

- Evaluation of patient heart rate changes

- Evaluation of patient QRS interval changes

- Evaluation of patient response to drug therapy treatment

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K133014: DMS 300-2W Holter Ecg Recorder.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K133014

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026