510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Powerport Implantable Port

K133335510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 14, 2014108-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5965

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

C.R. Bard, Inc. · LJT Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intravascular

Cleared on Feb 14, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K081311 (C.R. Bard, Inc., 2008) and 8 other predicates after a 108-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 2000.

Decided
Feb 14, 2014
Review
108 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LJT
Recalls
None
Predicates
9

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K001901 (2000). 28 ancestors in all, the oldest K863606 (1986). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 8 generations backK001901 Poly Per-Q-Cath Picc Catheter,Model 3236100 and Poly Per-Q-Cath…C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  2. 7 generations backK012902 Poly Per-Q-Cath Single Lumen Picc Catheter, Model 3143100; Poly…C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2001
  3. 6 generations backK031129 Poly Per-Q-Cath Picc Catheters; Poly RadpiccC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2003
  4. 5 generations backK034019 Poly Per-Q-Cath Picc CathetersC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  5. 4 generations backK050931 6 FR DL Powerpicc CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2005
  6. 3 generations backK051672 PowerpiccBard Access Systems, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  7. 2 generations backK060812 Powerport (TM)Implanted Titanium Port W/8 FR. Chronoflex…C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  8. 1 generation backK063377 Powerport Polymetric Port with 8 FR S/L Chronoflex CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  9. This deviceK133335 Powerport Implantable PortC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K001901Poly Per-Q-Cath Picc Catheter,Model 3236100 and Poly Per-Q-Cath Midline…C.R. Bard, Inc.20002
−7K012902Poly Per-Q-Cath Single Lumen Picc Catheter, Model 3143100; Poly Per-Q-Cath…C.R. Bard, Inc.2001—
−6K031129Poly Per-Q-Cath Picc Catheters; Poly RadpiccC.R. Bard, Inc.2003—
−5K034019Poly Per-Q-Cath Picc CathetersC.R. Bard, Inc.20041
−4K0509316 FR DL Powerpicc CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc.2005—
−3K051672PowerpiccBard Access Systems, Inc.20051
−2K060812Powerport (TM)Implanted Titanium Port W/8 FR. Chronoflex Catheter-MultipleC.R. Bard, Inc.20061
−1K063377Powerport Polymetric Port with 8 FR S/L Chronoflex CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc.20077
0 (this device)K133335Powerport Implantable PortC.R. Bard, Inc.2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198610
198720
198810
198940
199120
199310
200010
200110
200210
200310
200420
200520
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K133335, 2000–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LJT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LJT device

  1. #1 K251253 PowerPort™ isp Implantable Port; PowerPort™…score 14.9 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (9)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K081311Powerport Implanted Port with Groshong Catheter
Summary page 1
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K(081311 Predicate Devices Trade Name: PowerPort® Polymeric Port with 8 F Single Lumen…
C.R. Bard, Inc.2008—
*K063377Powerport Polymetric Port with 8 FR S/L Chronoflex Catheter
Summary page 1
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K(063377 Bard Access Systems, Inc. Section 5 -510(k) Summary Power a…
C.R. Bard, Inc.20077
*K050310Bardport Titanium Ports
Summary page 2
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K050310 Trade Name: X-PortO Duo Part Common Name: Im…
Bard Access Systems, Inc.20052
*K032044X-Prot Duo Port
Summary page 2
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K(032044 Trade Name: BardPort® X-PortO Isp Port Common Name:…
C.R. Bard, Inc.2003—
*K022983Bardport X-Port Isp Port
Summary page 2
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K(022983 Trade Name: Plastic Law-Profile Subcutaneous Port Common Name:…
C.R. Bard, Inc.20021
*K924250Plastic Low Profile Subcutaneous Port
Summary page 2
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K924250 Trade Name: Plastic Attachable Dual Port Common Name:…
Bard Access Systems, Inc.1993—
*K912702Plastic Attachable Dual Port
Summary page 2
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K(912702 Bard Access Systems. Inc. Section 5 - 51 0(k) Summary Power…
Davol, Inc.1991—
*K880571Cath-Tech Port Implantable Vascular Access System
Summary page 3
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K880571 Trade Name: Hickman Plastic Subcutaneous Port Common Name:…
Catheter Technology Corp.1988—
*K873213Hickman Plastic Subcutaneous Port
Summary page 3
…Product Code: UT Regulation: 21 CFR §880.5965 Premarket Notification: K(873213 PowerPortO PowerPort® Implantable Ports are designed to provide repeated access to t…
C.R. Bard, Inc.19873

Also cleared against K081311: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 12 months on median.
  • 14 of the 28 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K081311.

How does its category compare?

All LJT devices

LJT Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intravascular: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LJT

2in 2025

2007: 112008: 72009: 22010: 22011: 52012: 22013: 72014: 22015: 42016: 32019: 12020: 12023: 12024: 12025: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2007) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LJT

182in 2016

2007: 85 days median2008: 119 days median2011: 144 days median2013: 150 days median2015: 164 days median2016: 182 days median
2007high 182 (2016) · low 85 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LJT

1in 2022

2007: 12008: 22009: 22010: 192011: 12012: 22015: 12017: 12018: 12019: 72022: 12026 (partial year): 1, 1 Class I
2007high 19 (2010) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LJT

4,308in 2025

2007: 2082008: 1612009: 1722010: 2072011: 2022012: 1532013: 1412014: 1432015: 1492016: 1352017: 2622018: 8782019: 7652020: 9592021: 1,2852022: 1,3342023: 1,2212024: 1,8962025: 4,308
2007high 4,308 (2025) · low 135 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LJT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200711851208
200871192161
20092—2172
20102—19207
201151441202
20122—2153
201371500141
20142—0143
201541641149
201631820135
20170—1262
20180—1878
20191—7765
20201—0959
20210—01,285
20220—11,334
20231—01,221
20241—01,896
20252—04,308
20261—1 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The PowerPort® Implantable Port is indicated for patient therapies requiring repeated access to the vascular system. The port system can be used for infusion of medications, I.V. fluids, parenteral nutrition solutions, blood products, and for the withdrawal of blood samples. When used with a PowerLoc safety infusion set, the PowerPort device is indicated for power injection of contrast media. For power injection of contrast media, the maximum recommended…

Read the full statement (116 words)

The PowerPort® Implantable Port is indicated for patient therapies requiring repeated access to the vascular system. The port system can be used for infusion of medications, I.V. fluids, parenteral nutrition solutions, blood products, and for the withdrawal of blood samples.

When used with a PowerLoc safety infusion set, the PowerPort device is indicated for power injection of contrast media. For power injection of contrast media, the maximum recommended infusion rate is 5 mL/s.

The BardPort, SlimPort, and X-Port implantable ports are indicated for patient therapies requiring repeated access to the vascular system. The port system can be used for infusion of medications, I.V. fluids, parenteral nutrition solutions, blood products, and for the withdrawal of blood samples.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K133335: Powerport Implantable Port.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K133335

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026